Russia, Cuba, China, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Pakistan and Kazakhstan.

[Warfish]

What do these seven nations have in common?

[palmetto defender]

Originally Posted by Warfish

What do these seven nations have in common?

They all have corrupt leadership?
They all, in fact, hate us?

[quantum]

Originally Posted by Warfish

What do these seven nations have in common?

Never won a Super Bowl?

[DeanPatsFan]

All are or will be members of the UN's Human Rights Council.

What a freaking joke...

[IHATEDOLPHINS]

Originally Posted by DeanPatsFan

All are or will be members of the UN's Human Rights Council.

What a freaking joke...

Will Borat be the UN rep for Kazakhstan?

[DeanPatsFan]

Originally Posted by IHATEDOLPHINS

Will Borat be the UN rep for Kazakhstan?

He can't be any worse than any of the clowns currently inhabiting that useless organization.....

[SafetyBlitz]

google it, it goes to a fox editorial

good read, if ya like to criticize speeches before they happen

[quantum]

Originally Posted by SafetyBlitz

google it, it goes to a fox editorial

good read, if ya like to criticize speeches before they happen

its a time-saver.

[Warfish]

Originally Posted by SafetyBlitz

google it, it goes to a fox editorial

good read, if ya like to criticize speeches before they happen

The issue (for me) is not another speech.

It is the Nations who are on the U.N. Human Rights Council, and legitimacy (or lack thereof) the U.N., and the Council, have due to that.

So let me ask you point blank: Do you support these specific listed nations being on the U.S. Human Rights Council?

[SafetyBlitz]

Originally Posted by Warfish

The issue (for me) is not another speech.

It is the Nations who are on the U.N. Human Rights Council, and legitimacy (or lack thereof) the U.N., and the Council, have due to that.

So let me ask you point blank: Do you support these specific listed nations being on the U.S. Human Rights Council?

I think you replaced "S" with "N" in that last sentence, but anyway, no I don't support that those nations are/will be the U.N. Human Rights Council.

Nor do I wish to argue about the merits or crappiness of the UN.

[Warfish]

Originally Posted by SafetyBlitz

I think you replaced "S" with "N" in that last sentence, but anyway, no I don't support that those nations are/will be the U.N. Human Rights Council.

Aye, U.N., not U.S. (although given the funding it gets, it may as well be the U.S. tbah).

So you do not support them. Nice strait forward answer, thank you.

Nor do I wish to argue about the merits or crappiness of the UN.

Fair enough I suppose. I'll have to remember this line for future debates tho

[quantum]

Originally Posted by SafetyBlitz

I think you replaced "S" with "N" in that last sentence, but anyway, no I don't support that those nations are/will be the U.N. Human Rights Council.

Nor do I wish to argue about the merits or crappiness of the UN.

wait, wut? Your man Obuttocks thinks the UN is the shiz! You're not onboard?

[SafetyBlitz]

Originally Posted by quantum

wait, wut? Your man Obuttocks thinks the UN is the shiz! You're not onboard?

At least the UN was right about Iraq.

Your boy Bush, not so much.

[palmetto defender]

Originally Posted by SafetyBlitz

At least the UN was right about Iraq.

Your boy Bush, not so much.

How's that? The UN authorized an attack. Sounds good to me. Lots of dead Moslems - which is the ultimate goal. Kill them before they kill you.

[SafetyBlitz]

Originally Posted by palmetto defender

How's that? The UN authorized an attack. Sounds good to me. Lots of dead Moslems - which is the ultimate goal. Kill them before they kill you.

I love how 2000 - 2008 completely escapes your memory.

And "Sounds good to me. lots of dead Moslems" is... well... let's just say a terribly simplistic view of foreign affairs.