View Poll Results: Give Lamont Curtis' job in '04 and get the same (or better) results?

Voters
55. You may not vote on this poll
  • No

    41 74.55%
  • Yes

    14 25.45%
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 73

Thread: Would Lamont have got the same (or better) #'s than Curtis n '04 if he were starting?

  1. #1

    Would Lamont have got the same (or better) #'s than Curtis n '04 if he were starting?

    Would he have done the same (or better) than Curtis is given exactly the same # of opportunities?

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    13, Knights Who say Ni street, Long Island, NY.
    Posts
    7,824
    Who cares... honestly???

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by 13
    Who cares???
    We all do. He's the greatest - isnt he? Led us to a Superbowl in '04 and also '98. The workhorse every team feared.

  4. #4
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Naples FL
    Posts
    45,066
    Not with Hackett as the OC that's for sure!!

  5. #5
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    13, Knights Who say Ni street, Long Island, NY.
    Posts
    7,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetman73
    We all do. He's the greatest - isnt he? Led us to a Superbowl in '04 and also '98. The workhorse every team feared.
    What the hell are you babbling about????
    Last edited by 13; 10-28-2006 at 05:58 PM.

  6. #6

  7. #7
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    13, Knights Who say Ni street, Long Island, NY.
    Posts
    7,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Klecko73isGod
    Dump.
    my thoughts exactly.....

  8. #8
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    in the 90's
    Posts
    28,468
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetman73
    We all do. He's the greatest - isnt he? Led us to a Superbowl in '04 and also '98. The workhorse every team feared.
    Dude your trying your best to knock Curtis. haha you cant and that is whats so funny.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by 13
    Really... we were in the Superbowl in '98 and '04???
    Yes we were - thats why we're going to retire Curtis' #. Nobody was scarier to opposing defenses than Curtis.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetman73
    Yes we were - thats why we're going to retire Curtis' #. Nobody was scarier to opposing defenses than Curtis.
    Please stop dishonoring Klecko's number like this.

  11. #11
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    1,707
    Gay thread.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Klecko73isGod
    Dump.
    So, Joe, he was better than Freeman? Lead us to more playoff appearances? Had more huge games in the playoffs? Broke open more games when we needed it? Thats right - dump. Lets retire Chrebet's # as well.

  13. #13
    let me tell you Lamont really stuck it to the JEts once he left, he really showed what they missed out on, like an ex-girlfriend becoming a stripper, really rubbed it in the jets face, I really cant believe their are JET FANS that dont appreciate what Curtis has done in his Career

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by AnthonySerp
    let me tell you Lamont really stuck it to the JEts once he left, he really showed what they missed out on, like an ex-girlfriend becoming a stripper, really rubbed it in the jets face, I really cant believe their are JET FANS that dont appreciate what Curtis has done in his Career
    Curtis always played behind a good - to very good line - unlike in Oakland.

  15. #15
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Naples FL
    Posts
    45,066
    Quote Originally Posted by SBIIICHAMPS
    Dude your trying your best to knock Curtis. haha you cant and that is whats so funny.
    Why would anyone knock Cumar for what he was?? He was a excellent Workhorse back that had amazing durability and field vision! Was he a Back that came through in Big Games?? No...Matt Snell he wasn't!!

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetman73
    Curtis always played behind a good - to very good line - unlike in Oakland.

    its a matter of opinion....not gonna argue..but until Lamont proves himself as a feature back for a few years, there is no argument

  17. #17
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Naples FL
    Posts
    45,066
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetman73
    So, Joe, he was better than Freeman? Lead us to more playoff appearances? Had more huge games in the playoffs? Broke open more games when we needed it? Thats right - dump. Lets retire Chrebet's # as well.
    And for the Stat people..Wayne had better stats then Al Toon!!

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetman73
    So, Joe, he was better than Freeman? Lead us to more playoff appearances? Had more huge games in the playoffs? Broke open more games when we needed it? Thats right - dump. Lets retire Chrebet's # as well.
    YES!!!! He was better than McNeil!!! I've heard Freeman say so himself!!!! There's only an handful of backs in history I would take over Curtis.

    Jim Brown - best ever.
    Barry Sanders - close second.
    Walter Payton - The only guy more reliable and consistent than Curtis.

    Tyrell Davis? No. Flash in the pan. Career shortened by injury due to his running style.

    Gale Sayers? No. Ditto Davis.

    John Riggins? No. Better overall runner than Curtis, but a ****ty attitude.

    Franco Harris? No. Never met a sideline he didn't like.

    Eric Dickerson? No. Had only 3-4 truly great seasons and was otherwise average. Also a ****ty attitude.

    Emmitt Smith? No. Ran behind the greatest o-line in history. One can only wonder if Smith and Sander's switched teams what their carreer numbers would have looked like.

  19. #19
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bethel, CT
    Posts
    11,258
    is this really a poll about 2004 ?

    ibtd

  20. #20
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    28,194
    Can someplone please explain to me why some people are still talking about LaMont?

    The guy hasn't shown a damn thing in his career. We have Leon now.

    How about we forget about Jordan?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us