Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Yeah, yeah, I know this is OT

  1. #1
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    13,953

    Yeah, yeah, I know this is OT

    ...but this is important. Please take a few minutes and watch this video. It's about your American Liberty and it's demise...

    [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-ElrlwnMrA[/url]

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    13,953
    I guess nobody cares. I hope nobody cares when they come take your home, too.

  3. #3
    I'm with you, it's disgusting.

  4. #4
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    13,953
    Government run amok.

  5. #5
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    23,195
    Eminent domain...a very good reason to keep and bear arms..

    [url]http://www.castlecoalition.org/past_abuses/index.html[/url]

    [url]http://www.freestarmedia.com/index.html[/url]



    [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._New_London[/url]

    Subsequent to this decision, there was widespread outrage across the US. A California developer and libertarian, Logan Darrow Clements scooped a similar proposal by New Hampshire libertarians to seize Justice Souter's 'blighted' home in Weare, NH via eminent domain in order to build a "Lost Liberty Hotel" which he said would feature a "Just Desserts Cafe". Officials of the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire (LPNH) and the Coalition of New Hampshire Taxpayers had been eyeing the Justice's property to build a Constitution Park. A few weeks later, LPNH Vice-Chair Mike Lorrey discovered that Justice Breyer owned an extensive vacation estate in Plainfield, NH and announced on the New Hampshire Public Radio show The Exchange focusing on eminent domain that LPNH would be pursuing their Constitution Park concept with Breyer's property in mind. Lorrey and Clements both advocated an amendment to New Hampshire's Constitution limiting eminent domain, which passed New Hampshire's legislature on March 24, 2006. The text of the amendment is as follows: "No part of a person's property shall be taken by eminent domain and transferred, directly or indirectly, to another person if the taking is for the purpose of private development or other private use of the property.[6]" It passed by an overwhelming margin in the 2006 general election.[7]

  6. #6
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    13,953
    This is why I am a member of the Free State Project

    [url]www.freestateproject.org[/url]

  7. #7
    [QUOTE=freestater]This is why I am a member of the Free State Project

    [url]www.freestateproject.org[/url][/QUOTE]

    What's the point of it? No state taxes, RE taxes, em dom, what else?

  8. #8
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    13,953
    [QUOTE=BrooklynBound]What's the point of it? No state taxes, RE taxes, em dom, what else?[/QUOTE]
    to reduce the size and scope of Government in all phases. Basically, we believe the maximum moral role of government is to protect it's Citizens from force and fraud.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us