Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation

  1. #1

    U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation

    [QUOTE]Warning, there is a lot of whining towards the end of this article out of the Canadian Jewish News. What is clearly pointed out is any criticism of Israeli military brutality towards the Palestinians just isn't kosher with the "Kosher Nostra" crowd. ---

    Anti-Israel ad campaign set for Washington subway

    By ANDY LEVY-AJZENKOPF Staff Reporter

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - area commuters will be inundated with a controversial poster-ad campaign when they take the city’s subway system next month.

    Starting May 13 for four weeks, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) has ordered 20 of its subway stations to place posters advertising a June 10 rally to end “Israel’s illegal military occupation of the Palestinian West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem.”

    Initiated by a charity called the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, the 46-by-60-inch posters depict an imposing tank pointing its main firing turret at a child with a schoolbag walking along a dirt road.

    “Imagine if this were your child’s path to school. Palestinians don’t have to imagine,” the poster states, before continuing to call for an end to U.S. aid for “Israel’s brutal military occupation… paid for by U.S. taxpayers like you.”
    CBS Outdoor, the New York-based firm that places in-station advertising for WMATA, at first refused to consider the poster, but eventually relented to pressure from WMATA and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

    According to an April 4 report in the Washington Jewish Week online, the U.S. Campaign contacted the ACLU, which then advised WMATA to order CBS Outdoor to place the posters, citing freedom of speech rights.

    Joanne Ferreira, a WMATA spokesperson, said, “We didn’t have any problem with the ad. It was a First Amendment issue.”

    In the same report, Oren Segal, a spokesperson for the Anti-Defamation League said, “If past events by this organization are any indication, it will make no attempt to present a balanced view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and this ad is a pure reflection of that.”

    Jodi Senese, CBS Outdoor’s executive vice-president in charge of marketing, explained to The CJN last week why she first turned away the poster.
    “I initially rejected it on grounds that I thought it was too inflammatory to children,” she said over the phone from her Manhattan office.

    Senese recalled that she told U.S. Campaign staff that if they wanted to raise awareness for their campaign, she was fine with it based on First Amendment rights, “but not like this,” she said.

    The U.S. Campaign claims 250 member organizations in the United States. Its website features a prominent logo with the slogan, “Apartheid: Wrong for South Africans. Wrong for Palestinians.”

    Senese, who is Jewish, indicated that though she was uneasy with the ad, her personal feelings were not a part of her initial decision to dismiss the ad.
    “I’m very proud [of being a Jew],” Senese said. “I thought the image was inflammatory, but I also believe in our First Amendment rights. As Jews [in America], we thrive on that right as well.”

    Senese indicated at the time of the interview, that to her knowledge no other group had yet come forward with a counter-campaign for CBS Outdoor to run.

    Arthur Spitzer, who is Jewish and the legal director for the ACLU in the National Capital Area, told the Washington Jewish Week it wasn’t “a case about Judaism or Israel… but about establishing someone’s right to freedom of speech, which I agree with regardless of whether I agree with their particular political position.”

    Jewish organizations in the D.C. area downplayed the seriousness of the upcoming campaign.

    Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, president of Washington-based pro-Israel think-tank, the Israel Project, said her organization didn’t consider the ad campaign worth wasting resources to counter in the media and expected the ads to have a “minimum impact.”

    She said when the Israel Project and other prominent Jewish organizations in the area first learned about the ad, they worried about its “ominous” potential.

    They discussed the matter at length and then conducted several focus group studies on the ad with dozens of “highly educated people” before concluding the ad wasn’t worth combating actively.

    In fact, Laszlo Mizrahi claimed that of the dozens who analyzed the ad in the focus groups, upon first glance most thought the tank was an American one surrounded by Iraqi children. And even when they read the poster’s words, participants had little sympathy for the cause, she said.

    “It’s a poorly run... poorly executed campaign and the American people are onto [the U.S. Campaign’s] game,” Laszlo Mizrahi said. “There are real, legitimate threats to the U.S.-Israel relationship – this is just not one of them.

    “If these guys want to build support for their cause, they need to have something to sell that doesn’t encourage children to blow themselves up.”[/QUOTE]

    [url]http://mparent7777.blogspot.com/2007...n-set-for.html[/url]

    This is a big issue that can no longer be kept under the covers.

  2. #2
    Jerusalem always has and will always be part of Israel. I can see an open city for all to visit and live. But no way will Israel give back part of Jerusalem! It is the heart and soul of the Jewish Faith.

  3. #3
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    State Location Here
    Posts
    8,400
    [I]Initiated by a charity called the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, the 46-by-60-inch posters depict an imposing tank pointing its main firing turret at a child with a schoolbag walking along a dirt road. “Imagine if this were your child’s path to school. Palestinians don’t have to imagine.” [/I]

    Well, if it [I]was [/I] my kid, the schoolbag would not be loaded with 20 lbs. of explosives and nails, and I wouldn't have given him directions to the crowded shopping mall where he was to blow himself and everyone else up.

  4. #4
    [QUOTE=Jetdawgg][url]http://mparent7777.blogspot.com/2007...n-set-for.html[/url]

    This is a big issue that can no longer be kept under the covers.[/QUOTE]


    Since when has this issue been kept under the covers? What cave have you been living in?

  5. #5
    [QUOTE=Winstonbiggs]Since when has this issue been kept under the covers? What cave have you been living in?[/QUOTE]

    the issue is squelched by the words "anti semite" anytime the subject is raised.

    Where is your cave as it has been done on this site also?

  6. #6
    [QUOTE=Jetdawgg]the issue is squelched by the words "anti semite" anytime the subject is raised.

    Where is your cave as it has been done on this site also?[/QUOTE]


    JD, there are two sides to every story, so far as the problem with Israel and the Palestinians there are so many conflicting stories it is hard to know which is true. But the Jews are entitled to a homeland just like everyone else. If the outside agitators minded their own business maybe this would be settled!

  7. #7
    [QUOTE=Jetdawgg]the issue is squelched by the words "anti semite" anytime the subject is raised.

    Where is your cave as it has been done on this site also?[/QUOTE]

    Man you are on another planet sometimes. There have been more UN resolutions, more negiotations, more hand wringing by more countries and people over what is essentially a minor conflict in the world. You want to see real conflict real, human tradgedy, real squelched debate look at what's going on in Africa, it's a slaughter but because it's Muslim Blacks killing none Muslim Blacks nobody gives a rats ass.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us