Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The Movement for 4/29 Truth

  1. #1

    The Movement for 4/29 Truth

    Get on board people . . . how long before the next government conspiracy hurts someone you know . . .

    [b][url=""][color=#0000ff]Questions about what happened on 4/29[/color][/url][/b]

    [size=2]April 29th, 2007 [/size]
    The “[url=""][color=#0000ff]official story[/color][/url]” from “official government sources” is that weekend a lone gas truck driver crashed a single tanker loaded with 8,600 gallons of unleaded gasoline into a guardrail in what they [i]say[/i] was an ordinary accident. Unfortunately there are too many questionable statements, too many conflicting reports, and too many outright impossibilities for any serious, thoughtful individual to take this “official report” seriously.

    Let’s review the facts.

    [list][*][url=""][color=#0000ff]The bridge should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of burning auto fuel.[/color][/url][*][url=""][color=#0000ff]If steel from those overpasses did soften or melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to auto fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fire under that bridge.[/color][/url][*][url=""][color=#0000ff]800º C is near the maximum flame temperature of hydrocarbons burning in air without pre-heating or pressurization of the air[/color][/url], well below [url=""][color=#0000ff]the melting temperature of steel[/color][/url].[*]It is [url=""][color=#0000ff]impossible for fire to melt steel[/color][/url].
    [*]The section of the bridge appears to have fallen straight down, [url=""][color=#0000ff]exactly as it would have from demolition charges.[/color][/url][/list]Unlike the World Trade Center, the 580/980/880/80 overpass was reinforced against earthquakes and was not under the enormous compressive load that the towers were when they fell. The overpass was designed to support gridlocked traffic in an earthquake, but it collapsed without even a single car on it. The fire consumed only 8,600 gallons of fuel, whereas the WTC was allegedly brought down by [url=""][color=#0000ff]24,000 gallons of fuel[/color][/url]. Does Governor Schwarzenegger really expect us to believe a story [i]even more preposterous[/i] than the already-discredited official story about 9/11?To answer the question “Who is responsible for this terrible tragedy?” we must ask who stood to gain the most. George Soros? The California Department of Transportation? [url=""][color=#0000ff]The Jews[/color][/url]?

    We pray that those drawn to the 4/29 issue by sensationalist claims will stay long enough to learn the less theatrical but equally damning truth.




  2. #2
    Brilliant indeed.

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Must be Bush's fault!

  5. #5
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Van down by the river
    Still doesn't explain why on 9/11 and 7/7 both governments happened to be running exercises that almost mirrored what happened in reality...

  6. #6
    Hall Of Fame
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    L.I. NY (where the Jets used to be from)
    [QUOTE=MnJetFan]Must be Bush's fault![/QUOTE]
    Because he is stupid an mean, and yet brilliant enough to pull of the greatest conspiracy in history just so he could invade Iraq to control 4% of our oil supply!! :D


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Follow Us