Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Were the 'rats deceptive last election?

  1. #1
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Were the 'rats deceptive last election?

    Looks like it--
    [QUOTE]House Democrats are suddenly balking at the tough lobbying reforms they touted to voters last fall as a reason for putting them in charge of Congress.

    Now that they are running things, many Democrats want to keep the [b]big campaign donations and lavish parties that lobbyists put together for them. They're also having second thoughts about having to wait an extra year before they can become high-paid lobbyists themselves should they retire or be defeated at the polls.[/b] (my emphasis)

    The growing resistance to several proposed reforms now threatens passage of a bill that once seemed on track to fulfill Democrats' campaign promise of cleaner fundraising and lobbying practices.

    "The longer we wait, the weaker the bill seems to get," said Craig Holman of Public Citizen, which has pushed for the changes. "The sense of urgency is fading," he said, in part because scandals such as those involving disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former Rep. Duke Cunningham, R-Calif., have given way to other news.

    The situation concerns some Democrats, who note their party campaigned against a "culture of corruption" in 2006, when voters ended a long run of Republican control of Congress. Several high-profile issues remained in doubt Friday, five days before the House Judiciary Committee is to take up the legislation.

    They include proposals to:

    Require lobbyists to disclose details about large donations they arrange for politicians.

    Make former lawmakers wait two years, instead of one, before lobbying Congress.

    Bar lobbyists from throwing large parties for lawmakers at national political conventions.

    All appeared headed for adoption in January when the Senate, with much fanfare, included them in a lobby-reform bill that passed easily. But the provisions, plus many others in the bill, cannot become law unless the House concurs and that's where feet are dragging.

    The issues are in danger of being dropped from the House version, a Democratic member close to the negotiations said Thursday, speaking on condition of anonymity because sensitive discussions were continuing.
    [/QUOTE] :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
    [url=http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=3165636] source [/url]

    Former lawmakers should be barred from becoming lobbyists, period!
    Last edited by asuusa; 05-11-2007 at 09:34 PM.

  2. #2
    All Pro
    Annoying Chowd

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    6,258
    Post Thanks / Like
    The rats are deceptive EVERY election.

  3. #3
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,407
    Post Thanks / Like
    the Culture of Hypocrisy rides again......

  4. #4
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    14,748
    Post Thanks / Like
    The MSM reported this, surely you wouldn't agree with ABC.

    [QUOTE=Come Back to NY]the Culture of Hypocrisy rides again......[/QUOTE]

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us