
Originally Posted by
Reasonable man
Reasonable man really doesn't understand Boston Patriots vitriol. Reasonable man has only made fairly benign statements; albeit in the third person, which might be mildly frustrating -- apologies if it is frustrating. Reasonable man assumes that Boston Patriot had a bad day or something like that, maybe Boston Patriot had a fight with his significant other or work was rough. Reasonable man knows that all of this is just conjecture, but nonetheless he worries about Boston Patriot and, because Boston Patriot is ignoring him, Reasonable man encourages one of the fine members of this community to reach out to Boston Patriot to see if he is alright. Tell him that tomorrow will be better and to take a second to just breathe every now and again, little things like that can really provide comfort to people in their time of need. Reasonable man understands this might be quoted and used for a laugh, perhaps you will tell Reasonable man that he is putting himself up for liability through unreasonable acts. However, an action taken to save someone (or their property) in a moment of exigency is rarely held as contributory negligence, Eckert v. Long Island Railroad, 43 N.Y. 502, 1871 N.Y.
Bookmarks