Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 114

Thread: 'I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war'(video)

  1. #1

    'I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war'(video)

    [url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19588942/[/url]

    [QUOTE]“I didn’t vote for him,” an American once said, “But he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”

    That—on this eve of the 4th of July—is the essence of this democracy, in 17 words. And that is what President Bush threw away yesterday in commuting the sentence of Lewis “Scooter” Libby

    The man who said those 17 words—improbably enough—was the actor John Wayne. And Wayne, an ultra-conservative, said them, when he learned of the hair’s-breadth election of John F. Kennedy instead of his personal favorite, Richard Nixon in 1960.

    “I didn’t vote for him but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”
    The sentiment was doubtlessly expressed earlier, but there is something especially appropriate about hearing it, now, in Wayne’s voice: The crisp matter-of-fact acknowledgement that we have survived, even though for nearly two centuries now, our Commander-in-Chief has also served, simultaneously, as the head of one political party and often the scourge of all others.

    We as citizens must, at some point, ignore a president’s partisanship. Not that we may prosper as a nation, not that we may achieve, not that we may lead the world—but merely that we may function.

    But just as essential to the seventeen words of John Wayne, is an implicit trust—a sacred trust: That the president for whom so many did not vote, can in turn suspend his political self long enough, and for matters imperative enough, to conduct himself solely for the benefit of the entire Republic.
    Our generation’s willingness to state “we didn’t vote for him, but he’s our president, and we hope he does a good job,” was tested in the crucible of history, and earlier than most.

    And in circumstances more tragic and threatening. And we did that with which history tasked us.

    We enveloped our President in 2001.And those who did not believe he should have been elected—indeed those who did not believe he had been elected—willingly lowered their voices and assented to the sacred oath of non-partisanship.

    And George W. Bush took our assent, and re-configured it, and honed it, and shaped it to a razor-sharp point and stabbed this nation in the back with it.
    Were there any remaining lingering doubt otherwise, or any remaining lingering hope, it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the prison sentence of one of his own staffers.

    Did so even before the appeals process was complete; did so without as much as a courtesy consultation with the Department of Justice; did so despite what James Madison—at the Constitutional Convention—said about impeaching any president who pardoned or sheltered those who had committed crimes “advised by” that president; did so without the slightest concern that even the most detached of citizens must look at the chain of events and wonder: To what degree was Mr. Libby told: break the law however you wish—the President will keep you out of prison?

    In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that fundamental com-pact between yourself and the majority of this nation’s citizens—the ones who did not cast votes for you. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the President of the United States. In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the President of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party. And this is too important a time, Sir, to have a commander-in-chief who puts party over nation.

    This has been, of course, the gathering legacy of this Administration. Few of its decisions have escaped the stain of politics. The extraordinary Karl Rove has spoken of “a permanent Republican majority,” as if such a thing—or a permanent Democratic majority—is not antithetical to that upon which rests: our country, our history, our revolution, our freedoms.

    Yet our Democracy has survived shrewder men than Karl Rove. And it has survived the frequent stain of politics upon the fabric of government. But this administration, with ever-increasing insistence and almost theocratic zealotry, has turned that stain into a massive oil spill.

    The protection of the environment is turned over to those of one political party, who will financially benefit from the rape of the environment. The protections of the Constitution are turned over to those of one political party, who believe those protections unnecessary and extravagant and quaint.

    The enforcement of the laws is turned over to those of one political party, who will swear beforehand that they will not enforce those laws. The choice between war and peace is turned over to those of one political party, who stand to gain vast wealth by ensuring that there is never peace, but only war.

    And now, when just one cooked book gets corrected by an honest auditor, when just one trampling of the inherent and inviolable fairness of government is rejected by an impartial judge, when just one wild-eyed partisan is stopped by the figure of blind justice, this President decides that he, and not the law, must prevail.

    I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war.

    I accuse you of fabricating in the minds of your own people, a false implied link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11.

    I accuse you of firing the generals who told you that the plans for Iraq were disastrously insufficient.

    I accuse you of causing in Iraq the needless deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons, and sisters and daughters, and friends and neighbors.

    I accuse you of subverting the Constitution, not in some misguided but sincerely-motivated struggle to combat terrorists, but to stifle dissent.

    I accuse you of fomenting fear among your own people, of creating the very terror you claim to have fought.

    I accuse you of exploiting that unreasoning fear, the natural fear of your own people who just want to live their lives in peace, as a political tool to slander your critics and libel your opponents.

    I accuse you of handing part of this Republic over to a Vice President who is without conscience, and letting him run roughshod over it.

    And I accuse you now, Mr. Bush, of giving, through that Vice President, carte blanche to Mr. Libby, to help defame Ambassador Joseph Wilson by any means necessary, to lie to Grand Juries and Special Counsel and before a court, in order to protect the mechanisms and particulars of that defamation, with your guarantee that Libby would never see prison, and, in so doing, as Ambassador Wilson himself phrased it here last night, of becoming an accessory to the obstruction of justice.

    When President Nixon ordered the firing of the Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the infamous “Saturday Night Massacre” on October 20th, 1973, Cox initially responded tersely, and ominously.

    “Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men, is now for Congress, and ultimately, the American people.”

    President Nixon did not understand how he had crystallized the issue of Watergate for the American people.

    It had been about the obscure meaning behind an attempt to break in to a rival party’s headquarters; and the labyrinthine effort to cover-up that break-in and the related crimes.

    And in one night, Nixon transformed it.
    Watergate—instantaneously—became a simpler issue: a President overruling the inexorable march of the law of insisting—in a way that resonated viscerally with millions who had not previously understood - that he was the law.

    Not the Constitution. Not the Congress. Not the Courts. Just him.
    Just - Mr. Bush - as you did, yesterday.

    The twists and turns of Plame-Gate, of your precise and intricate lies that sent us into this bottomless pit of Iraq; your lies upon the lies to discredit Joe Wilson; your lies upon the lies upon the lies to throw the sand at the “referee” of Prosecutor Fitzgerald’s analogy. These are complex and often painful to follow, and too much, perhaps, for the average citizen.

    But when other citizens render a verdict against your man, Mr. Bush—and then you spit in the faces of those jurors and that judge and the judges who were yet to hear the appeal—the average citizen understands that, Sir.
    It’s the fixed ballgame and the rigged casino and the pre-arranged lottery all rolled into one—and it stinks. And they know it.

    Nixon’s mistake, the last and most fatal of them, the firing of Archibald Cox, was enough to cost him the presidency. And in the end, even Richard Nixon could say he could not put this nation through an impeachment.
    It was far too late for it to matter then, but as the decades unfold, that single final gesture of non-partisanship, of acknowledged responsibility not to self, not to party, not to “base,” but to country, echoes loudly into history. Even Richard Nixon knew it was time to resign

    Would that you could say that, Mr. Bush. And that you could say it for Mr. Cheney. You both crossed the Rubicon yesterday. Which one of you chose the route, no longer matters. Which is the ventriloquist, and which the dummy, is irrelevant.

    But that you have twisted the machinery of government into nothing more than a tawdry machine of politics, is the only fact that remains relevant.
    It is nearly July 4th, Mr. Bush, the commemoration of the moment we Americans decided that rather than live under a King who made up the laws, or erased them, or ignored them—or commuted the sentences of those rightly convicted under them—we would force our independence, and regain our sacred freedoms.

    We of this time—and our leaders in Congress, of both parties—must now live up to those standards which echo through our history: Pressure, negotiate, impeach—get you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who are now perilous to our Democracy, away from its helm.

    For you, Mr. Bush, and for Mr. Cheney, there is a lesser task. You need merely achieve a very low threshold indeed. Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed, on August 9th, 1974.
    Resign.

    And give us someone—anyone—about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, “I didn’t vote for him, but he’s my president, and I hope he does a good job.”[/QUOTE]

  2. #2
    I saw this online last night and I actually thought to myself, why hasn't Jetdawgg posted this yet? Maybe he doesn't watch Olbermann anymore?

    No such luck.

  3. #3

    Been real busy. Had a great quarter

    [IMG]http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u17/jetdawgg/BushCheneyPrison.gif[/IMG]

  4. #4
    [I]or any remaining lingering hope, it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the prison sentence of one of his own staffers.[/I]

    Oh, please. All logical constructs are acceptable in the liberal echo chamber provided they end on an anti-Bush note.

  5. #5
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    I'm sure the lunatic liberals in congress fighting for the fairness doctrine will make sure to impose it on dipsh!ts like olbermann.... :rolleyes:

    this way half of the show will be hosted by Rush Limbaugh.....come to think of it, that's probably the only way olbermann gets out of the cellar in the ratings battle.... :yes:

  6. #6
    [QUOTE=Come Back to NY]I'm sure the lunatic liberals in congress fighting for the fairness doctrine will make sure to impose it on dipsh!ts like olbermann.... :rolleyes:

    this way half of the show will be hosted by Rush Limbaugh.....come to think of it, that's probably the only way olbermann gets out of the cellar in the ratings battle.... :yes:[/QUOTE]

    Still not commenting on the content of the thread? Great job CBTNY

  7. #7
    [QUOTE=Jetdawgg]Still not commenting on the content of the thread? Great job CBTNY[/QUOTE]
    You shouldn't use "content" and the Plame-gate in the same sentence. Is it beneath you to read (not complimentary of Bush, btw) Novak's column today? Damn good and damn well makes the case that this was not a turning point in American history, but instead an endless anti-Bush crusade.

  8. #8
    [QUOTE=Jetdawgg]Still not commenting on the content of the thread? Great job CBTNY[/QUOTE]


    There's really nothing to comment on. This commuting of Libby's sentence was nothing compared to some of BJ Clinton's pardons, and Olbermann used it as an excuse to go on yet another whiny tirade. Who gave this guy his own show?!?

  9. #9
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    11,586
    it's truly disgraceful that these guys have no fear whatsoever of impropriety, when they should be avoiding the mere appearance of acting improperly, whether true or not. it takes big balls. big balls.

  10. #10
    [QUOTE=isired]it's truly disgraceful that these guys have no fear whatsoever of impropriety, when they should be avoiding the mere appearance of acting improperly, whether true or not. it takes big balls. big balls.[/QUOTE]
    ???

  11. #11
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    [QUOTE=Jetdawgg]Still not commenting on the content of the thread? Great job CBTNY[/QUOTE]

    when you post something worth commenting on I'll expend the effort....until then your usual grabage is not worth the bandwidth.....

  12. #12
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    11,586
    [QUOTE=sackdance]???[/QUOTE]i thought it was self-explanatory. these guys go around pardoning their friends, while thousands if not tens of thousands are locked up for the same or lesser crimes. even if the guy did not lie, and was completely innocent, bush should not have commuted his sentence - BECAUSE HE WAS ON THE STAFF. Even if he commuted the sentence of perjurors every friday and twice on tuesdays, he should have left libby alone. you not only are required to act properly, you are duty-bound to avoid so much as the appearance of acting improperly. they're all disgraceful.

  13. #13
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    [QUOTE=isired]i thought it was self-explanatory. these guys go around pardoning their friends, while thousands if not tens of thousands are locked up for the same or lesser crimes. even if the guy did not lie, and was completely innocent, bush should not have commuted his sentence - BECAUSE HE WAS ON THE STAFF. Even if he commuted the sentence of perjurors every friday and twice on tuesdays, he should have left libby alone. [/QUOTE]

    hence when any President commutes the sentence of a killer he should commute the sentences of all killers???

    or if a President pardons one tax evaders by extension he should pardon all tax evaders??

    or if a President pardons terrorists then all convicted terrorists should be pardoned???

    and so on...and so on???

    [QUOTE]you not only are required to act properly, you are duty-bound to avoid so much as the appearance of acting improperly. they're all disgraceful.[/QUOTE]

    explain how there is an "appearance" of acting improperly.....

  14. #14
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    11,586
    [QUOTE=Come Back to NY]hence when any President commutes the sentence of a killer he should commute the sentences of all killers???

    or if a President pardons one tax evaders by extension he should pardon all tax evaders??

    or if a President pardons terrorists then all convicted terrorists should be pardoned???

    and so on...and so on???



    explain how there is an "appearance" of acting improperly.....[/QUOTE]no, it's the opposite - not that he should commute all killers, but that he should NOT pardon his friend, the killer. even if he would normally pardon his friend, he can't. it doesn't look right.

  15. #15
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    [QUOTE=isired]no, it's the opposite - not that he should commute all killers, but that he should NOT pardon his friend, the killer. even if he would normally pardon his friend, he can't. it doesn't look right.[/QUOTE]


    so even if he thinks the sentence is excessive he should not commute the sentence because it "doesn't look right"???? that's a very lib point of view- don't do the right thing, do the popular thing...

    the facts are the rats put all the cards into this and lost....and lost big time

    this whole plamegate issue was hatched by GWB/Dick Cheney/Karl Rove to get back at her husband....problem is after a three year investigation in which the SP knew who the leaker was two days into the case, they found nothing criminal except a guy who screwed up his stories.... BUT WAIT- even though that three year investigation did not show a damn thing Libby was going to sing like a bird on appeal!!!

    In the end it was GWB/Dick Cheney/Karl Rove fault that plame's identity was revealed and now, after a three year investigation, it's their fault no one can find a shred of evidence that they purposely released her identity....

    and in the end who do mindless lunatics like dumbdawg turn to for reconciliation??? a ratings cellar-dweller like keith olbermann...

    the same "rational" host who ran with a story from a homemade web site (Truthout) written by a self admitted mentally ill drug addict (Jason Leopold) claiming Karl Rove was told by SP Fitzgerald to get his affairs in order as he was going to be indicted....only to watch Rove have his name cleared three days after olbermann ran with the story...

    the irony is the only people who were proven to have lied outright about the substance of the issue were valerie plame and liar joe wilson...and nothing was done...
    Last edited by Come Back to NY; 07-06-2007 at 12:04 AM.

  16. #16
    I guess it is pretty easy to ignore what a jury decided about Libby.

    [QUOTE=Come Back to NY]
    the irony is the only people who were proven to have lied outright were valerie plame and liar joe wilson...[/QUOTE]

  17. #17
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Long Island & Section 337
    Posts
    4,859
    [QUOTE=cr726]I guess it is pretty easy to ignore what a jury decided about Libby.[/QUOTE]
    What, no pictures to post?

  18. #18
    [QUOTE=HDCentStOhio]What, no pictures to post?[/QUOTE]

    [IMG]http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u17/jetdawgg/205deadrepublican.jpg[/IMG]

    [IMG]http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u17/jetdawgg/vote-republican_tbh.jpg[/IMG]

  19. #19
    Glad to see your are posting something other than you unrelenting support of CBTNY and the other right wing cronies.

    [QUOTE=HDCentStOhio]What, no pictures to post?[/QUOTE]

  20. #20
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    versus your intellectually stimulating and thought provoking posts.... :zzz:

    then again you've been b!tchslapped every step of the way with plamegate and liar joe wilson, so what else can you do???

    [QUOTE=cr726]Glad to see your are posting something other than you unrelenting support of CBTNY and the other right wing cronies.[/QUOTE]

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us