Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Charter JI Member
Osama Bin Laden's dreams denied by US might
it's too bad the criminal liberal media in this country, carrying the water for rat-wingers on Capitol Hill, are so blind with hatred and so hell bent on a power grab that they bypass the obvious which an British newspaper can accept....
[QUOTE][B]Osama Bin Laden's dreams denied by US might
By Michael Burleigh
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 11/09/2007[/B]
Six years separate us from a crime that makes the time of "new world orders" (George H Bush) and "it's the economy, stupid" (William Jefferson Clinton) in the 1990s seem very distant. As if to remind us of who and what fundamentally altered the world's compass, Osama bin Laden has reappeared "live", departing from the manner of his previous media outings since October 2004. This has mainly provoked comment about the shape and colour of the beard of the world's foremost fugitive. Is resort to hairdye a harbinger of war, or merely personal vanity?
Despite the $50 million reward for information leading to bin Laden's capture, he is still at large, somewhere in the greater Palermo of Pakistan's lawless tribal areas. Experts say he has paid off the turbaned Don Corleones while he moves around within concentric rings of security, including men equipped with shoulder-launched missiles and a personal executioner to deliver the coup de grāce if things look really sticky.
CIA analysts will also be poring over the content of "The Solution", the homily bin Laden delivered on al-Qa'eda's As Sahab television channel, searching for coded operational messages. Roman-style, the self-styled "Sheikh" asks Americans to "lend me your ears", appealing to them over the head of President Bush.
Bin Laden has been hard at work reading in his years of enforced isolation. In his speech he frequently refers to the outpourings of the US Leftist Noam Chomsky, to the effect that Western democracy is a sham masking the amoral ruthlessness of major corporations.
Having designated them as "the real tyrannical terrorists", bin Laden attacks the impact of corporate "globalisation" upon Africa and the planet's climate. He even spares a thought for home-owners struggling to pay sub-prime mortgages, contrasting their plight with those fortunates who only pay Islamic zakat at 2.5 per cent. This is prefatory to a general injunction for us all to convert to Islam, described as a most tolerant creed, his "evidence" being that Muslims did not carry out the Holocaust, while Jews and Christians allegedly live harmoniously in Islamic countries.
It is tempting to dismiss these cosmic ruminations and historical lies as the irrelevant maunderings of a man who cannot use either the internet or a mobile phone, and whose once prodigious wealth has been spent or is frozen. They seem curiously detached from al-Qa'eda's usual tones, more like an appeal to leading Western Leftists.
Perhaps this is having some effect: two of the recent suspects detained on the cusp of a terrorist attack were young German converts to Islam, who a generation ago might have joined a Baader-Meinhof gang whose moralising posturings against corporations are indistinguishable from bin Laden's.
Although bin Laden speaks with airy self-assurance, the reality of al-Qa'eda is much more mixed than on September 11, 2001, when 19 men wrong-footed a hyper-power. Several key supporters have been captured or killed, with the Egyptian evil genius Ayman al Zawahiri narrowly evading death this year when a US bomb hit an Afghan house to which he had been located.
Attempts to carry out major attacks in western Europe have been thwarted by diligent, intelligence-led police work as we saw last week in Germany, or the terrorists' lack of competence, as happened in Britain on July 21, 2005.
We must be under no illusion: al-Qa'eda and its affiliates will be constantly looking for Western weak points, or seeking to use indigenous converts or Muslim "clean skins" who appear on no early-warning monitoring systems. Perhaps European states will be wise enough to investigate schemes adopted in Indonesia or Saudi Arabia to catch young men at the earliest stages of radicalisation - say when they access a particular internet site - so as to move in with programmes designed to halt their slide into jihadist violence.
Further afield, in the past few days, al-Qa'eda of the Islamic Maghreb murdered 37 young Algerian coastguards at their morning flag-raising ceremony, while a further 20 perished when a bomb exploded in a crowd gathering at Bitna to welcome Algeria's president Abdelaziz Bouteflika, the presumed target.
Elsewhere, a low-key US presence in Djibouti has severely cramped the style of al-Qa'eda in the Horn of Africa, in operations that have received Ethiopian, Kenyan and Yemeni assistance. In Iraq, Sunni tribes have begun to have grave doubts about the foreign jihadists, helping the US military to destroy them. Even Sunni insurgents have realised that there is no future with people who shoot children for playing with American-donated footballs or who hack off the fingers of smokers. Moreover, the US "surge" has diminished the number of car bomb attacks.
Although the deaths of 400 Yazidi are regrettable, that this attack on a remote sect was all that al-Qa'eda in Iraq could mount to discredit the surge is indicative of its strategic weakness.
The only major cloud on this horizon is, as Con Coughlin has reported, intimations that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard may be building up the experienced Egyptian al-Qa'eda terrorist Saif-al-Adel, who has been based in Teheran since 2001, priming the organisation for a possible terrorist response to any military action that the West may be contemplating to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons programme.
Al-Qa'eda's long-term aims have not changed, namely the establishment of a global Islamic caliphate on the ruins of existing states some time before 2020, if informed Arab commentators are to be credited. This will then wage the final apocalyptic battle against the West. In those terms, al-Qa'eda has singularly failed, since it has not succeeded in toppling a single Middle Eastern, North Africa or Asian regime, while the US has forces positioned not only to combat terrorists in Afghanistan or Iraq, but which significantly influence decision making in the wider neighbourhoods, too. No wonder bin Laden's thoughts are turning to the droughts, rains and polar icecaps, since there is little to console him in the world of men.
Jets Insider VIP JetsInsider.com Legend Charter JI Member
[QUOTE=Jetdawgg]He can only say those things cause Bush failed to kill him[/QUOTE]
and if he didn't say them the next terrorist would be saying things that parrelleled what you believe....again- your words, actions, thoughts are the one's used by terrorists...you must be very proud....
[QUOTE=Come Back to NY]and if he didn't say them the next terrorist would be saying things that parrelleled what you believe....again- your words, actions, thoughts are the one's used by terrorists...you must be very proud....[/QUOTE]
Not if that terrorist were dead like OBL should be by now