Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30

Thread: Of course the Red Sox won 2 WS during Bush administration

  1. #1

    Of course the Red Sox won 2 WS during Bush administration

    Makes perfect sense. Whatever could of went wrong during Bush's time in the White House... did go wrong.

    Red Sox winning it all, twice none the less, is a prime example of that.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Ryan View Post
    Makes perfect sense. Whatever could of went wrong during Bush's time in the White House... did go wrong.

    Red Sox winning it all, twice none the less, is a prime example of that.
    And they did it without a cheating pitcher.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by FoxboroFanatic2 View Post
    And they did it without a cheating pitcher.
    Gagne.

    You continue to show you know zip about baseball.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Ryan View Post
    Gagne.

    You continue to show you know zip about baseball.
    Yeah, he was clutch.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Ryan View Post
    Gagne.

    You continue to show you know zip about baseball.
    OK, Ill edit, they won it without a cheating pitcher who actually contributed.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by FoxboroFanatic2 View Post
    OK, Ill edit, they won it without a cheating pitcher who actually contributed.
    You cannot tell me Varitek wasn't juicing.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by pauliec View Post
    You cannot tell me Varitek wasn't juicing.
    I can't? OK. I won't.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by FoxboroFanatic2 View Post
    OK, Ill edit, they won it without a cheating pitcher who actually contributed.
    Eric Gagne

    2007 World Series

    1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 1 K

    He contributed.


  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by pauliec View Post
    You cannot tell me Varitek wasn't juicing.
    You cannot tell me the Pats suck.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Ryan View Post
    Eric Gagne

    2007 World Series

    1 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 1 K

    He contributed.

    Yeah, I think he was 2nd in MVP vote.

  11. #11
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    13,559
    Quote Originally Posted by pauliec View Post
    You cannot tell me Varitek wasn't juicing.
    Big Papi, the list goes on.

    Especially hypocritical from someone who defends the Pats' cheating

  12. #12

    Actually .... no.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Ryan View Post
    Makes perfect sense. Whatever could of went wrong during Bush's time in the White House... did go wrong.

    Red Sox winning it all, twice none the less, is a prime example of that.
    I'm not happy the Red Sox won the title, that's for sure. But "whatever could go wrong ... did go wrong." Ridiculous. You're still using a computer in a house or an office with heat and/or air ... you probably have a job in which you make more money than most people on the planet ... yeah, we Americans aren't spoiled ... not in the least.

  13. #13
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    13,559
    Baseball forum or politics forum?

    By the way, Sean, ever notice the correllation between Yankee championships and Democratic presidencies? Don't have the numbers off hand, but check it out of the top of my head:

    Bush: 01-now: 0
    Clinton: 93-01: 4
    Bush: 89-93: 0
    Reagan: 81-89: 0
    Carter: 77-81: 2
    Ford: 74-77: 0
    Nixon: 69-74: 0
    Johnson: 63-69: 0 (only exception)
    Kennedy: 61-63: 2

    Democrats in bold
    Last edited by JetPotato; 02-28-2008 at 02:24 PM.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Guido Monzino View Post
    Big Papi, the list goes on.

    Especially hypocritical from someone who defends the Pats' cheating
    Guido, point me at ONE SINGLE POST where I defended Pats cheating. I'll wait.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Ryan View Post
    Makes perfect sense. Whatever could of went wrong during Bush's time in the White House... did go wrong.

    Red Sox winning it all, twice none the less, is a prime example of that.
    Hey Sean, there's a bright side from your Yankees perspective...a good chance a Dem wins the white house. The Yanks haven't won a WS with a Repub. in the White House since Eisenhower.
    Last edited by SINYJets; 02-28-2008 at 02:26 PM.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Guido Monzino View Post
    Big Papi, the list goes on.
    I like how you can just name anyone you suspect. I guess I'll just throw out that I KNOW who uses steroids on the Jets.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by SINYJets View Post
    Hey Sean, there's a bright side from your Yankees perspective...a good chance a Dem wins the white house. The Yanks haven't won a WS with a Dem in the White House since JFK.
    Bill Clinton?

  18. #18
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    13,559
    Quote Originally Posted by SINYJets View Post
    Hey Sean, there's a bright side from your Yankees perspective...a good chance a Dem wins the white house. The Yanks haven't won a WS with a Dem in the White House since JFK.
    Wrong. I think you meant the opposite. See my above post.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Guido Monzino View Post
    Baseball forum or politics forum?

    By the way, Sean, ever notice the correllation between Yankee championships and Democratic presidencies? Don't have the numbers off hand, but check it out of the top of my head:

    Bush: 01-now: 0
    Clinton: 93-01: 4
    Bush: 89-93: 0
    Reagan: 81-89: 0
    Carter: 77-81: 2
    Ford: 74-77: 0
    Nixon: 69-74: 0
    Johnson: 63-69: 0 (only exception)
    Kennedy: 61-63: 2

    Democrats in bold
    No wonder I'm democrat....

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Guido Monzino View Post
    Wrong. I think you meant the opposite. See my above post.
    Fixed it...meant to say Republican obviously...got sidetracked by the boss.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us