Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Bush's Earmarks Request for the last budget: Over 330 Million

  1. #1
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,793

    Bush's Earmarks Request for the last budget: Over 330 Million

    [url]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/washington/10earmark.html[/url]

    [QUOTE]President Bush often denounces the propensity of Congress to earmark money for pet projects. But in his new budget, Mr. Bush has requested money for thousands of similar projects

    He asked for money to build fish hatcheries, eradicate agricultural pests, conduct research, pave highways, dredge harbors and perform many other specific local tasks.

    The details are buried deep in the president’s budget, just as most Congressional earmarks are buried in obscure committee reports that accompany spending bills.

    Thus, for example, the president requested $330 million to deal with plant pests like the emerald ash borer, the light brown apple moth and the sirex woodwasp. He sought $800,000 for the Neosho National Fish Hatchery in Missouri and $1.5 million for a waterway named in honor of former Senator J. Bennett Johnston, a Louisiana Democrat.

    At the same time, Mr. Bush requested $894,000 for an air traffic control tower in Kalamazoo, Mich.; $12 million for a parachute repair shop at the American air base in Aviano, Italy; and $6.5 million for research in Wyoming on the “fundamental properties of asphalt.”

    He sought $3 million for a forest conservation project in Minnesota, $2.1 million for a neutrino detector at the South Pole and $28 million for General Electric and Siemens to do research on hydrogen-fuel turbines.

    The projects, itemized in thousands of pages of budget documents submitted last week to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, show that the debate over earmarks is much more complex than the “all or nothing” choice usually presented to the public. The president and Congress both want to direct money to specific projects, but often disagree over the merits of particular items.

    The White House contends that when the president requests money for a project, it has gone through a rigorous review — by the agency, the White House or both — using objective criteria.

    Mr. Bush has often derided Congressional earmarks as “special interest items” that waste taxpayer money and undermine trust in government. Congress, he said, included more than 11,700 earmarks totaling almost $17 billion in spending bills for the current fiscal year.

    But some of those earmarks were similar or identical to ones included in the 2009 budget that Mr. Bush sent Congress last week. For example, Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the Democratic whip, obtained an earmark of $1.5 million last year to deal with the emerald ash borer, a beetle that attacks trees, lawns and crops. Mr. Bush now wants more money to fight that insect.
    [/QUOTE]

    Right/Left

    No difference.

  2. #2
    What were McCain's request compared to Obama? That is who will be on the ballot in November.

    Sorry to offend you by asking to compare Obama's RECORD with that of McCain. I realize that is not allowed but decided to ask anyway.

    [quote=PlumberKhan;2410944][URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/washington/10earmark.html[/URL]



    Right/Left

    No difference.[/quote]

  3. #3
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,793
    [QUOTE=angry jets fan;2410960]What were McCain's request compared to Obama? That is who will be on the ballot in November.

    Sorry to offend you by asking to compare Obama's RECORD with that of McCain. I realize that is not allowed but decided to ask anyway.[/QUOTE]

    You didn't offend, bro. I just got done reading this article right before I saw the thread you started. Thought it a matter of simplistic irony.

    Mccain's record is quite good when it comes to this stuff. But forgive me for not believing republicans anymore as they are habitual liars, regardless of past performances. I remember a candidate who promised no nation building and smaller government and then proceeded to do the exact opposite...build nations and add many new layers of government bureaucracy.

    Bush is a dead horse, no more beating required. But the voters should be beaten WITH the dead horse until they realize that the people chosen to represent them are psychopathic habitual liars who are the exact opposite of their parties supposed platform.

    Fiscally conservative? My a**...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us