Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Report: Spitzer to Resign Today

  1. #1
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Long Island & Section 337
    Posts
    4,859

    Report: Spitzer to Resign Today

    As per MSNBC. Announcement at 11:30AM

    [url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23572671/?GT1=43001[/url]

  2. #2
    Good.

    There was no way he was going to be able to effectively govern after this. Glad he faced reality and did the right thing.

  3. #3
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fairfield County, CT
    Posts
    6,870
    AP now says resignation Monday.

    Lt. Governor Paterson needs "more time".

  4. #4
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    Albany today....Sing-Sing tomorrow....

    see ya' il deutsche :byebye:

  5. #5
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    amazing....

    they are saying reports were his WIFE wanted him to fight to remain governor...

    I wonder how many other wives would be so understanding if any of us spent $80K on whores and got caught...

  6. #6
    Spitzer's Media Enablers
    By KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL
    March 12, 2008; Page A21

    The fall of New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer holds many lessons, and the press will surely be examining them in coming months. But don't expect the press corps to delve into the biggest lesson of all -- its own role as his enabler.

    Journalists have spent the past two days asking how a man of Mr. Spitzer's stature would allow himself to get involved in a prostitution ring. The answer, in my mind, is clear. The former New York attorney general never believed normal rules applied to him, and his view was validated time and again by an adoring press. "You play hard, you play rough, and hopefully you don't get caught," said Mr. Spitzer two years ago. He never did get caught, because most reporters were his accomplices.


    Journalism has many functions, but perhaps the most important is keeping tabs on public officials. That duty is even more vital concerning government positions that are subject to few other checks and balances. Chief among those is the prosecutor, who can use his awesome state power to punish, even destroy, private citizens.

    Yet from the start, the press corps acted as an adjunct of Spitzer power, rather than a skeptic of it. Many journalists get into this business because they want to see wrongs righted. Mr. Spitzer portrayed himself as the moral avenger. He was the slayer of the big guy, the fat cat, the Wall Street titan -- all allegedly on behalf of the little guy. The press ate it up, and came back for more.

    Time magazine bestowed upon Mr. Spitzer the title "Crusader of the Year," and likened him to Moses. Fortune dubbed him the "Enforcer." A fawning article in the Atlantic Monthly in 2004 explained he was "a rock star," and "the Democratic Party's future." In an uncritical 2006 biography, then Washington Post reporter Brooke Masters compared the attorney general to no less than Teddy Roosevelt.

    What the media never acknowledged is that somewhere along the line (say, his first day in public office) Mr. Spitzer became the big guy, the titan. He had the power to trample lives and bend the rules, while also burnishing his own political fortune. He was the one who deserved as much, if not more, scrutiny as onetime New York Stock Exchange chief Dick Grasso or former American International Group CEO Maurice "Hank" Greenberg.

    What makes this more embarrassing for any self-respecting journalist is that Mr. Spitzer knew all this, and played the media like a Stradivarius. He knew what sort of storyline they'd be sympathetic to, and spun it. He knew, too, that as financial journalism has become more competitive, breaking news can make a career. He doled out scoops to favored reporters, who repaid him with allegiance. News organizations that dared to criticize him were cut off. After a time, few criticized anymore.

    Instead, reporters felt obligated to run with whatever he handed them. Consider the report in the wake of a 2005 op-ed in this newspaper by John Whitehead. A respected Wall Street figure, Mr. Whitehead dared to criticize Mr. Spitzer for his unscrupulously zealous pursuit of Mr. Greenberg. Mr. Spitzer later threatened Mr. Whitehead, telling him in a phone call that "You will pay the price. This is only the beginning and you will pay dearly for what you have done." Some months later, after more Spitzer excesses, Mr. Whitehead had the temerity to write another op-ed describing what Mr. Spitzer had said.

    Within a few days, the press was reporting (unsourced, of course) that Mr. Whitehead had defended Mr. Greenberg a few weeks after a Greenberg charity had given $25 million to the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation -- a group Mr. Whitehead chaired. So Mr. Whitehead's on-the-record views were met with an unsourced smear implying bad faith. The press ran with it anyway.

    In 2005, Mr. Spitzer went on national television to suggest that Mr. Greenberg had engaged in criminal activity. It was front-page news. About six months later, on the eve of a Thanksgiving weekend, Mr. Spitzer quietly disclosed that he lacked the evidence to press criminal charges. That news was buried inside the papers.

    What makes this history all the more unfortunate is that the warning signs about Mr. Spitzer were many and manifest. In the final days of Mr. Spitzer's run for attorney general in 1998, the news broke that he'd twisted campaign-finance laws so that his father could fund his unsuccessful 1994 run. Mr. Spitzer won anyway, and the story was largely forgotten.

    New York Stock Exchange caretaker CEO John Reed suggested Mr. Spitzer hadn't told the truth when he said that it was Mr. Reed who wanted him to investigate Mr. Grasso's pay. The press never investigated.

    Mr. Spitzer's main offense as a prosecutor is that he violated the basic rules of fairness and due process: Innocent until proven guilty; the right to your day in court. The Spitzer method was to target public companies and officials, leak allegations and out-of-context emails to a compliant press, watch the stock price fall, threaten a corporate indictment (a death sentence), and then move in for a quick settlement kill. There was rarely a trial, fair or unfair, involved.

    On the substance, his court record speaks for itself. Most of Mr. Spitzer's high-profile charges have gone up in smoke. A New York state judge threw out his case against tax firm H&R Block. He lost his prosecution against Bank of America broker Ted Sihpol (whom Mr. Spitzer threatened to arrest in front of his child and pregnant wife). Mr. Spitzer was stopped by a federal judge from prying confidential information out of mortgage companies. Another New York judge blocked the heart of his suit against Mr. Grasso. Mr. Greenberg continues to fight his civil charges. The press was foursquare behind Mr. Spitzer in all these cases, and in a better world they'd share some of his humiliation.

    Instead, remarkably, they continue to defend him. Ms. Masters, his biographer, was on CNN the day Mr. Spitzer's prostitution news broke, reassuring viewers that the governor really was a "lovely" guy. Other news reporters were reporting what a "tragedy" it was that such a leading light in the Democratic Party could come to such an ignoble end.

    There's little that's tragic about Mr. Spitzer, unless you consider his victims (which would appear to include his own family). The press would do well to meditate on that, and consider how many violations they winked at and validated over the years. Politicians don't exist to be idolized by the press, at least not by any press corps doing its job.

    Ms. Strassel, who covered Eliot Spitzer's investigations, now writes the Journal's Potomac Watch column from Washington.

    See all of today's editorials and op-eds, plus video commentary, on Opinion Journal.

    And add your comments to the Opinion Journal forum.

  7. #7
    [QUOTE=Come Back to NY;2428305]amazing....

    they are saying reports were his WIFE wanted him to fight to remain governor...

    I wonder how many other wives would be so understanding if any of us spent $80K on whores and got caught...[/QUOTE]

    That's an excellent question. I wonder what Ms. Cheney thinks of just that.

    Curious, did they ever solve the murder of that US assistant attorney investigating the DC Madam case? Probably not, huh?

  8. #8
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    [QUOTE=Press_Coverage;2428987]That's an excellent question. I wonder what Ms. Cheney thinks of just that.

    Curious, did they ever solve the murder of that US assistant attorney investigating the DC Madam case? Probably not, huh?[/QUOTE]

    more garbage baseless speculation from the king of delusions...

  9. #9
    I wonder who he pissed off to get outted though. Murder, drugs, prostitution, lies, bribery, and abuse of power & money at the expense of others is what makes up American politics. Almost all of them do it and usually get caught if their luck runs out or they step outta (party) line.

  10. #10
    [QUOTE=Blacksmurf;2429104]I wonder who he pissed off to get outted though. Murder, drugs, prostitution, lies, bribery, and abuse of power & money at the expense of others is what makes up American politics. Almost all of them do it and usually get caught if their luck runs out or they step outta (party) line.[/QUOTE]
    First, start wondering who he's never pissed off. Then name a couple of American politicians (but not almost all of them, thanks) that you know to be involved with murder, drugs and prostitution on a criminal level. And, for a change, no Bush/Cheney.

  11. #11
    [QUOTE=sackdance;2429119]First, start wondering who he's never pissed off. Then name a couple of American politicians (but not almost all of them, thanks) that you know to be involved with murder, drugs and prostitution on a criminal level. And, for a change, no Bush/Cheney.[/QUOTE]

    The END OF DAYS is near.

    Do we actually agree on something?!

  12. #12
    [QUOTE=Press_Coverage;2428987]That's an excellent question. I wonder what Ms. Cheney thinks of just that.

    Curious, did they ever solve the murder of that US assistant attorney investigating the DC Madam case? Probably not, huh?[/QUOTE]

    Cheney cheated on his wife? I know McCain and Bush Sr. cheated on their wives but I didnt hear anything about Cheney

  13. #13
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    23,070
    [QUOTE=JetsWI;2429142]Cheney cheated on his wife? I know McCain and Bush Sr. cheated on their wives but I didnt hear anything about Cheney[/QUOTE]

    Nah....he never cheated on his wife.

    But he did shoot some guy in the face.


    :P


    Oh...and he destroyed Alderaan...

  14. #14
    [QUOTE=JetsWI;2429142]Cheney cheated on his wife? I know McCain and Bush Sr. cheated on their wives but I didnt hear anything about Cheney[/QUOTE]


    Google DC Madam and Cheney... It's all over the net, and ABC had it before curiously dropping the story.... Madsden cites 3 seperate sources confirming it, including CIA and Pentagon officials.

    Even Palfrey's lawyer is "neither confirming nor denying" Cheney's name is on her phone records.... Regardless, you can rest assured it won't be brought up in next month's trial... Not before a magistrate or two involved in the case takes a dirt nap.

    Here's a funny from [URL="http://rawstory.com/news/2007/DC_madam_lawyer_Cheney_isnt_not_0523.html"]Raw[/URL]:

    [INDENT]At his website, Madsen mentioned that CBS late night host David Letterman referred to the Cheney rumour.

    "Here's a story we're working on now," Letterman said, according to Madsen's account. "Apparently, there are rumors coming out of Washington that Vice President Dick Cheney, when he was the CEO of Halliburton, used to go visit prostitutes. This could explain why one girl was paid two billion dollars. I mean, I was thinking about this and Cheney ... I mean, going to a prostitute, that's ... I mean, I can't believe a good-looking guy like that would ever have to pay for sex, you know what I'm saying?"

    Wonkette explained why its staffers were "underwhelmed by this rumor."

    "Because even if it’s a fact, which it probably is, there’s no way it would have any impact on Cheney’s 'career,'" Wonkette continued. [B]"This is a draft-dodging half-human war criminal with a pregnant lesbian daughter who tells senators to **** themselves and shoots his own friends in the face. Ordering an outcall hooker is positively innocent compared to the well-known things Cheney does every day[/B]."[/INDENT]
    Last edited by Press_Coverage; 03-12-2008 at 07:49 PM.

  15. #15
    [QUOTE=Press_Coverage;2429295]Google DC Madam and Cheney... It's all over the net, and ABC had it before curiously dropping the story.... Madsden cites 3 seperate sources confirming it, including CIA and Pentagon officials.

    Even Palfrey's lawyer is "neither confirming nor denying" Cheney's name is on her phone records.... Regardless, you can rest assured it won't be brought up in next month's trial... Not before a magistrate or two involved in the case takes a dirt nap.

    Here's a funny from [URL="http://rawstory.com/news/2007/DC_madam_lawyer_Cheney_isnt_not_0523.html"]Raw[/URL]:

    [INDENT]At his website, Madsen mentioned that CBS late night host David Letterman referred to the Cheney rumour.

    "Here's a story we're working on now," Letterman said, according to Madsen's account. "Apparently, there are rumors coming out of Washington that Vice President Dick Cheney, when he was the CEO of Halliburton, used to go visit prostitutes. This could explain why one girl was paid two billion dollars. I mean, I was thinking about this and Cheney ... I mean, going to a prostitute, that's ... I mean, I can't believe a good-looking guy like that would ever have to pay for sex, you know what I'm saying?"

    Wonkette explained why its staffers were "underwhelmed by this rumor."

    [B]"Because even if it’s a fact, which it probably is, there’s no way it would have any impact on Cheney’s 'career,'" Wonkette continued. [B]"This is a draft-dodging half-human war criminal with a pregnant lesbian daughter who tells senators to **** themselves and shoots his own friends in the face. Ordering an outcall hooker is positively innocent compared to the well-known things Cheney does every day[/B]."[/INDENT][/QUOTE][/B]

    One of the funniest things I have read :P

  16. #16
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    [QUOTE=Press_Coverage;2429295]Google DC Madam and Cheney... [/QUOTE]

    and after the google "press coverage is an ass hole".....you'll get 53,900 links:

    [url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&as_qdr=all&q=press+coverage+is+an+*******[/url]

  17. #17
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    On some beach... somewhere...
    Posts
    3,735
    [QUOTE=Come Back to NY;2429435]and after the google "press coverage is an ass hole".....you'll get 53,900 links:

    [url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&as_qdr=all&q=press+coverage+is+an+*******[/url][/QUOTE]

    hmmm I got 54,200 hits.

  18. #18
    [QUOTE=Come Back to NY;2429435]and after the google "press coverage is an ass hole".....you'll get 53,900 links:

    [url]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&as_qdr=all&q=press+coverage+is+an+*******[/url][/QUOTE]

    Gosh, that was a mistake on your part.

    Yours in the same phrase garnered [URL="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Come+Back+to+New+York+in+an+ass+hole"]366,000 links[/URL]. Or, if you spell ******* correctly as one word, it's [URL="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Come+Back+to+NY+in+an+*******"]421,000 links.[/URL]

    To be fair, only [URL="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Come+Back+to+NY+in+an+ass+hole"]330,000 [/URL]if you just use NY instead of "New York".

    LOL.... Tool.

    Man, are you ever batting practice.

    Again, you should consider blocking me.
    Last edited by Press_Coverage; 03-13-2008 at 06:59 AM.

  19. #19
    [QUOTE=Press_Coverage;2429840]Again, you should consider blocking me.[/QUOTE]
    Consider something else.

    1) Timely thread about Spitzer.
    2) Press_Coverage with one post turns it into Cheney conspiracy/flamewar. Thread effectively over.

    You do this same act[I] every fuggin' day[/I]. Your needy cries for attention kills this forum. How you were not banned months - wait, hold on that's impossible - weeks ago is beyond me.

  20. #20
    [QUOTE=Blacksmurf;2429128]The END OF DAYS is near.

    Do we actually agree on something?![/QUOTE]
    LOL, not so fast. I meant 'cite some politicians - without using Bush or Cheney'.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us