Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Sadr

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,844
    Post Thanks / Like

    Sadr

    Why do we put up this a--hole. Just bulldoze the area and be done withit!


    [url]http://www.ktlkfm.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104668&article=3512453[/url]

  2. #2
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,677
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=MnJetFan;2471204]Why do we put up this a--hole. Just bulldoze the area and be done withit!


    [url]http://www.ktlkfm.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104668&article=3512453[/url][/QUOTE]

    Because he has alot of supportfrom the Iraqis. In a fair election this fall, he will gain many seats in the government.

    BTW what makes you think hes any more of an A-hole than Maliki is?

  3. #3
    All League
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,844
    Post Thanks / Like
    Malaki was elected, Sadr is a self appointed a-hole with support from Iran!

  4. #4
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,677
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=MnJetFan;2471331]Malaki was elected, Sadr is a self appointed a-hole with support from Iran![/QUOTE]

    Maliki was elected because Sadr threw his support to him. W/O Sadr's vote, Maliki would not have won. Dont gorget, Sadr did get alot of votes (not hm personally, his political wing) and has a stronghold on the south. With the elections coming up this fall and Sadr angry at the Maliki govt, maliki knows Sadr will sweep the south in the elections. Thats why he is trying to make Sadr look weak/bad with these BS raids. Unfortunately this is backfiring on the Maliki govt as Sadr looks stronger than ever in the south.

  5. #5
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,677
    Post Thanks / Like
    Again, why the love for Maliki??
    Both Maliki and Sadr are supporters of Iran and both have strong ties to Iran (actually Maliki has stronger ties).

  6. #6
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    235
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=kennyo7;2471762]Again, why the love for Maliki??
    Both Maliki and Sadr are supporters of Iran and both have strong ties to Iran (actually Maliki has stronger ties).[/QUOTE]

    How does Malika have STRONGER ties to Iran then Sadr?

  7. #7
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,677
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JerseyJet2007;2471777]How does Malika have STRONGER ties to Iran then Sadr?[/QUOTE]

    I suggest you read abut Maliki's DAWA Party. Then read about who the SCIRI is and who trained the BADR Corps , both of who are supported and work for Maliki.

    BTW did you see the reception Maliki had for Ahmedinejad? He rolled out the red carpet and greeted him with open arms. He called him a "friend" and Iran a "great ally" . Ahmedinejad announced his visit weeks in advanced while our officials have to visit in secret or risk being assasinated.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    235
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=kennyo7;2471787]I suggest you read abut Maliki's DAWA Party. Then read about who the SCIRI is and who trained the BADR Corps , both of who are supported and work for Maliki.

    BTW did you see the reception Maliki had for Ahmedinejad? He rolled out the red carpet and greeted him with open arms. He called him a "friend" and Iran a "great ally" . Ahmedinejad announced his visit weeks in advanced while our officials have to visit in secret or risk being assasinated.[/QUOTE]

    NO Kenny I agree. I know Malika has ties to Iran. But to say they are stronger then someone who gets weapons and training from Iran is a little much.

  9. #9
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,677
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JerseyJet2007;2471791]NO Kenny I agree. I know Malika has ties to Iran. But to say they are stronger then someone who gets weapons and training from Iran is a little much.[/QUOTE]

    Sadr actually has had a rift with Iran and recently there are many in Iran's govt who dont support Sadr and prefer Maliki over him. In addition Sadr always talked about maintining an Iraqi identity seperate from Iran. He did not flee to Iran under Saddams rein as did Maliki. His ties to Tehran are not as strong as Maliki's

    BTW Maliki also is getting weapons from Iran. Dont kid yourself.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    235
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=kennyo7;2471801]Sadr actually has had a rift with Iran and recently there are many in Iran's govt who dont support Sadr and prefer Maliki over him. In addition Sadr always talked about maintining an Iraqi identity seperate from Iran. He did not flee to Iran under Saddams rein as did Maliki. His ties to Tehran are not as strong as Maliki's

    BTW Maliki also is getting weapons from Iran. Dont kid yourself.[/QUOTE]

    BTW.. I meant weapons that weren't used to kill our Servicemen.

  11. #11
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,677
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JerseyJet2007;2471805]BTW.. I meant weapons that weren't used to kill our Servicemen.[/QUOTE]

    ....yet.

  12. #12
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    235
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=kennyo7;2471814]....yet.[/QUOTE]

    What are you implying? That the weapons Maliki gets are used to kill them anyway? I'm sure that's the case once and a while, but to compare that to someone who's militia gets armed by Iran to do battle with the USA, is a little crazy Kenny.

  13. #13
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,369
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=MnJetFan;2471204]Why do we put up this a--hole. Just bulldoze the area and be done withit!
    [/QUOTE]

    Because...without him, no insurgents. Without insurgents, no reason to stay in Iraqistan. No reason to stay in Iraqistan, no reason to spend 14 million dollars an hour on "rebuilding".

  14. #14
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    235
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=PlumberKhan;2471827]Because...without him, no insurgents. Without insurgents, no reason to stay in Iraqistan. No reason to stay in Iraqistan, no reason to spend 14 million dollars an hour on "rebuilding".[/QUOTE]

    So now we're using Sadr to stay in Iraq? Because Bush wants to kill people for oil, makes total sense. And your a fool if you think insurgents wouldn;t be there if we killed Sadr.

  15. #15
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,677
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JerseyJet2007;2471826]What are you implying? That the weapons Maliki gets are used to kill them anyway? I'm sure that's the case once and a while, but to compare that to someone who's militia gets armed by Iran to do battle with the USA, is a little crazy Kenny.[/QUOTE]

    The Madhi Army isnt being armed to do battle with the USA. They are not stupid, they know they are no match for the USA. But they do have other agenda. To get into power.

    BTW , why is Iran arming militias friendly to Maliki such as the Badr Corps? Are they also aiming to fight the USA???

  16. #16
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=MnJetFan;2471204]Why do we put up this a--hole. Just bulldoze the area and be done withit!


    [url]http://www.ktlkfm.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=104668&article=3512453[/url][/QUOTE]

    sounds like a brilliant plan! Did CurtisMartin 28 help you formulate it after sharing a black powder shake with you? How many times did he tell you about his 138 IQ?

    also sounds like you would have no problem getting a job in Bush's administration if you wanted one

  17. #17
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,369
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JerseyJet2007;2471836]So now we're using Sadr to stay in Iraq? Because Bush wants to kill people for oil, makes total sense. And your a fool if you think insurgents wouldn;t be there if we killed Sadr.[/QUOTE]

    No. We're not USING Sadr to stay in Iraq...but any unrest the dude causes is a great excuse for lazy Iraqis not to meet the benchmarks we set for them last(deja vu) year.

    Bush wants to kill people for oil? Nah...oil is last centuries excuse to go to war. Get with the program.

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,123
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=PlumberKhan;2472124]Bush wants to kill people for oil? Nah...oil is last centuries excuse to go to war. Get with the program.[/QUOTE]

    Well, no. It remains this century's as well. And will ony get worse as it continues to run out.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us