View Poll Results: Vogue cover controversy: coincidence or no?

3. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, its just a freakish coincidence

    1 33.33%
  • No, it's a deliberate conjuring up of an image that should be forgotten

    2 66.67%
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Vogue cover controversy: coincidence or no?

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Vogue cover controversy: coincidence or no?

  2. #2
    Just so you know, the image is from a WWI recruitment poster (I forget if it was targeted at an American or British audience) and is meant to depict the savagery of the "huns" after the brutal invasion of Belgium. It was meant to suggest savagery, and the rendition is meant to evoke an animalistic ape rather than an "African savage". That being said, I think the Vogue cover absolutely is meant to evoke King Kong imagery and was in bad taste.

  3. #3
    All League
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Parsippany, NJ
    Who cares? It was a few months ago.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Follow Us