I suppose that also introduces an interpretation problem - how do you define what is disrespectful.
Okay, I concede. Now I'm swung back to the "no censorship" side. But it's still close. I just can't get over how crushing it would be to see my wife or son or daughter split apart six thousand miles away on the cover of a magazine. Hell, seeing that wedding photo of Ty Zeigler or whatever his name was was crushing enough for me and I never knew him.
Yeah. I think what it comes down to is that the societal benefits of a free press outweigh the harm to any individual when the media uses its freedom in non-tortious but still hurtful and unwise ways.
Sort of like democracy - its the worst alternative, except for all the others