Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: How A General Scolded Donald Rumsfeld

  1. #1

    How A General Scolded Donald Rumsfeld

    The following article is written by Thomas Ricks, who wrote "Fiasco"the best book critical of Iraq war policy to date.

    General Shinseki was made famous for telling Congress that three times more troops would be necessary to occupy Iraq after the conflict to which Wolfowitz"smugly replied that in Congressional testimony that "that would be hard to imagine. General Shinseki was then relieved of his position and retired by Rumsfeld.

    Having been on both sides of the policies in question, both overseas and in D.C., this letter presents a new perspective during that controversial pre-war period.

    [url]www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072901647.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter[/url]


    [QUOTE]How does an Army chief of staff chew out his boss, the defense secretary?

    Gen. Eric K. Shinseki shows how it's done in this letter written to Donald H. Rumsfeld just before Shinseki stepped down in June 2003. During the run-up to the war, the general told Congress that more troops would be needed to secure Iraq, which earned him a famously public rebuke by then-Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz. Shinseki was said to still be angry about the dust-up when he retired.

    The general's letter may be more history than news at this point, but its criticism of the way Rumsfeld's office worked does shed some additional light on the development of the mess in Iraq. And Shinseki's comments are particularly interesting because he has maintained an almost total silence in the five years since his retirement. This may be the most we ever learn about his perspective.[/QUOTE]
    Last edited by Equilibrium; 07-30-2008 at 04:39 PM.

  2. #2
    So true Equilibrium. This whole business with Shinseki shows what hypocrisy Bush practiced when he said that war policy is set by the generals on the ground. This caper was the first instance of where Bush went general shopping. This administration has been so pathetic in practically every phase of it's operations.

    January 2009 cannot come soon enough whether it is McCain or Obama.

  3. #3
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    thanks for sharing

  4. #4
    [quote=Queens Jet Fan;2656459]So true Equilibrium. This whole business with Shinseki shows what hypocrisy Bush practiced when he said that war policy is set by the generals on the ground. This caper was the first instance of where Bush went general shopping. This administration has been so pathetic in practically every phase of it's operations.

    January 2009 cannot come soon enough whether it is McCain or Obama.[/quote]

    Agreed

  5. #5
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,393
    [quote=Queens Jet Fan;2656459]So true Equilibrium. This whole business with Shinseki shows what hypocrisy Bush practiced when he said that war policy is set by the generals on the ground. This caper was the first instance of where Bush went general shopping. This administration has been so pathetic in practically every phase of it's operations.

    January 2009 cannot come soon enough whether it is McCain or Obama.[/quote]

    Ignoring and picking and choosing which generals to listen to happens on both the right and left and has happened for decades.

    As far as military men, I'm sure all you good libs agree wholeheartedly with a decorated and proven war hero like John McCain over say, another "decorated" vet that lied about his country and fellow soldiers named john kerry?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us