[quote=][B]Three times in recent years, the Arizona senator's lists of 'objectionable' pork spending have included earmarks requested by his new running mate.[/B]
September 3, 2008
WASILLA, ALASKA -- [B]For much of his long career in Washington, John McCain has been throwing darts at the special spending system known as earmarking, through which powerful members of Congress can deliver federal cash for pet projects back home with little or no public scrutiny. He's even gone so far as to publish "pork lists" detailing these financial favors.
Three times in recent years, McCain's catalogs of "objectionable" spending have included earmarks for this small Alaska town, requested by its mayor at the time -- Sarah Palin.[/B]
Now, McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee, has chosen Palin as his running mate, touting her as a reformer just like him.
[B]McCain has made opposition to pork-barrel spending a central theme of his 2008 campaign. "Earmarking deprives federal agencies of scarce resources, at the whim of individual members of Congress," McCain has said.
But records show that Palin -- first as mayor of Wasilla and recently as governor of Alaska -- was far from shy about pursuing tens of millions in earmarks for her town, her region and her state.
This year, Palin, who has been governor for nearly 22 months, defended earmarking as a vital part of the legislative system. "The federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship," she wrote in a newspaper column.[/B]
[B]In 2001, McCain's list of spending that had been approved without the normal budget scrutiny included a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in Wasilla. The Arizona senator targeted $1 million in a 2002 spending bill for an emergency communications center in town -- one that local law enforcement has said is redundant and creates confusion.[/B]
[B]McCain also criticized $450,000 set aside for an agricultural processing facility in Wasilla that was requested during Palin's tenure as mayor and cleared Congress soon after she left office in 2002.[/B] The funding was provided to help direct locally grown produce to schools, prisons and other government institutions, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group.
[B]Wasilla received $11.9 million in earmarks from 2000 to 2003. The results of this spending are very apparent today.[/B] (The town also benefited from $15 million in federal funds to promote regional rail transportation.)
The community transit center is a landmark: a one-story, tile-fronted building with a drive-through garage. Its fleet of 10 buses provides service throughout the region. Mat-Su Community Transit Agency officials say the building was made possible with a combination of federal money and matching gifts from a private foundation.
[B]Taylor Griffin, a McCain campaign spokesman, said that when Palin became mayor in 1996, "she faced a system that was broken. Small towns like Wasilla in Alaska depended on earmarks to take care of basic needs. . . . That was something that Gov. Palin was alarmed about and was one of the formative experiences that led her toward the reform-oriented stance that she has taken as her career has progressed."[/B]
[B]Palin, he said, was "disgusted" that small towns like hers were dependent on earmarks.[/B]
[B]Public records paint a different picture:[/B]
[B]Wasilla had received few if any earmarks before Palin became mayor. She actively sought federal funds -- a campaign that began to pay off only after she hired a lobbyist with close ties to Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who long controlled federal spending as chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. He made funneling money to Alaska his hallmark.[/B]
Steven Silver was a former chief of staff for Stevens. After he was hired, Wasilla obtained funding for several projects in 2002, including an additional $600,000 in transportation funding.
That year, a local water and sewer project received $1.5 million, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, which combs federal spending measures to identify projects inserted by congressional members.
[B]When Palin spoke after McCain introduced her as his running mate at a rally in Ohio last week, she made fun of earmarking. She said she had rejected $223 million in federal funds for a bridge linking Ketchikan to an island with an airport and 50 residents, referring to it by its derogatory label: the "bridge to nowhere."[/B]
In the nationally televised speech, she stood by McCain and said, "I've championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. In fact, I told Congress thanks, but no thanks, on that bridge to nowhere. If our state wanted a bridge, I said, we'd build it ourselves."
[B]However, as a candidate for governor in 2006, Palin had backed funding for the bridge.[/B] After her election, she killed the much-ridiculed project when it became clear the state had other priorities. She said she would use the federal funds to fill those needs.
This year she submitted to Congress a list of Alaska projects worth $197.8 million, including $2 million to research crab productivity in the Bering Sea and $7.4 million to improve runway lighting at eight Alaska airports. A spokesman said she cut the original list of 54 projects to 31.
[B]"So while Sen. McCain was going after cutting earmarks in Washington," said Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense, "Gov. Palin was going after getting earmarks."[/B][/quote]
the main problem i have with this is the initial press releases touting Palin as a reformer against wasteful gov spending. Either they didnt do their research, or were blatantly trying to slip a lie right past us.
While I don't agree with pork... This "and $7.4 million to improve runway lighting at eight Alaska airports. A spokesman said she cut the original list of 54 projects to 31." seems like a fairly worthy cause.
[QUOTE=shuler82;2724764]the main problem i have with this is the initial press releases touting Palin as a reformer against wasteful gov spending. Either they didnt do their research, or were blatantly trying to slip a lie right past us.[/QUOTE]
Exactly, this would be a non issue if they weren't trying to pass her off as a reformer and a maverick...Her record paints a completely different picture...If they vetted her like they claim then they have just been caught in a huge lie...
[QUOTE=Batmans A Scientist;2724780]While I don't agree with pork... This "and $7.4 million to improve runway lighting at eight Alaska airports. A spokesman said she cut the original list of 54 projects to 31." seems like a fairly worthy cause.[/QUOTE]
Man, I for one, am shocked that she would have the gall to try to take the government's money. What a thief. How could McCain have nominated her knowing that she tried to take federal funds so she could spend it in her state. I'm sure that none of the other 49 governors would ever have supported something like this. Sickening, that's what it is.
And they call her a reformer. What's the point of busting up moneyed interests and corrupt politicians if all you're going to do after that is try to take cash from the government? She didn't even want to spend any Alaskan funds on these projects, so why did she try to make the Congress pay for them? It just doesn't make sense.
[QUOTE=pauliec;2724781]Being a little dramatic, aren't you? Not 6 months ago Biden said McCain would make a better President than Obama. On national TV.[/QUOTE]
Sarah Palin is a catastrophe, if you take off the Republican shades you would see that...Biden has a big mouth and is a flip flopper, he changes his mind every time the wind changes direction...That said, take a look at John McCain's record from 2000-2008...McCain is the raw definition of a flip flopper and the worst of its kind...The guy has gone against his OWN legislation for Christ sake...I wouldn't take what either one of them says seriously...
You have to be a shill of the worst kind to not see how damaging this latest Palin revelation would be if the media does its job and brings it up tonight...The GOP has been trying to pass Palin off as a "maverick" and a "reformer"...McCain campaign officials have stated many times she was properly vetted yet her record clearly shows she is no maverick or a reformer...She's your average run-of-the-mill corrupt politician...Hopefully the media plasters this new bit of information on Palin all over the coverage of tonight's speeches...The real Sarah Palin needs to introduced to the American people...
[QUOTE=nyctomjetsfan;2724782]Exactly, this would be a non issue if they weren't trying to pass her off as a reformer and a maverick...Her record paints a completely different picture...If they vetted her like they claim then they have just been caught in a huge lie...[/QUOTE]yeah airport lights is such a waste of money...keep getting your info from a football blog.
[QUOTE=2foolish197;2725266]so the la times said airport lights was pork? a waste of money?[/QUOTE]
The answer to that is no, its not a waste of money but mostly everything else on that long list is debatable though...John McCain who is an expert on this subject, took issue with Mrs Palin's spending on 3 separate occasions in the past and put her on his "objectionable" spending list...If you have a problem with anything on that list then question McCain's judgment, not the articles validity...
Last edited by nyctomjetsfan; 09-03-2008 at 09:07 PM.