Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: WMD report: US remains 'dangerously vulnerable'

  1. #1
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Miami, Fl
    Posts
    18,661
    Post Thanks / Like

    WMD report: US remains 'dangerously vulnerable'

    [SIZE="5"]WMD report: US remains 'dangerously vulnerable'[/SIZE]
    By BRETT J. BLACKLEDGE and EILEEN SULLIVAN

    The United States remains "dangerously vulnerable" to chemical, biological and nuclear attacks seven years after 9/11, a forthcoming independent study concludes. And a House Democrats' report says the Bush administration has missed one opportunity after another to improve the nation's security.

    The recent political rupture between Russia and the U.S. only makes matters worse, said Lee Hamilton, the former Indiana Democratic congressman who helped lead the 9/11 Commission and now chairs the independent group's latest study.

    Efforts to reduce access to nuclear technology and bomb-making materials have slowed, thousands of U.S. chemical plants remain unprotected, and the U.S. government continues to oppose strengthening an international treaty to prevent bioterrorism, according to the report produced by the bipartisan Partnership for a Secure America.

    The group includes leaders of the disbanded 9/11 Commission, the bipartisan panel that investigated government missteps before the 2001 terror attacks on the United States.

    "The threat of a new, major terrorist attack on the United States is still very real," concludes the report to be released Wednesday, the same day a congressional commission will hold a hearing in New York on nuclear and biological terrorism threats.

    "A nuclear, chemical or biological weapon in the hands of terrorists remains the single greatest threat to our nation. While progress has been made in securing these weapons and materials, we are still dangerously vulnerable," the report said.

    Congressional Democrats, meanwhile, had harsher criticism of the Bush administration's efforts. Their report, written by the staffs of the House Homeland Security and Foreign Affairs committees, found little or no progress across the board on national security initiatives.

    "The Bush administration has not delivered on a myriad of critical homeland and national security mandates," the Democrats' report states. That report was being released Tuesday.

    "The administration has just failed to act in so many ways," said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. "Let's say that we've been fortunate that we have not been attacked" since 2001, said Thompson, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.

    The independent report focuses narrowly on weapons of mass destruction.

    The report and supporting studies describe the failure of international cooperation to prevent terrorists from obtaining weapons of mass destruction, which they call a major problem. Many countries continue to ignore a United Nations mandate to prevent the spread of weapons; the ability of many countries to monitor potential bioterrorism is "essentially nonexistent," and dangerous chemical weapons stockpiles remain in some countries, including Russia and Libya, the report said.

    Russia has been a significant player in U.S. efforts to secure nuclear weapons and to eliminate inventories of chemical weapons in the former Soviet region. That cooperation could be jeopardized as the two countries face off over the Russian invasion of Georgia and concerns about a U.S. missile defense base in Poland, Hamilton said.

    Bush on Monday Bush on canceled a civilian nuclear cooperation deal with Russia.

    "The things we do to penalize Russia will make it more difficult for us to deal with Russia on other matters," Hamilton said.

    State Department spokesman Robert Wood said he hasn't seen the report. But he said there have been a number of successes in recent years, including negotiations to dismantle North Korea's nuclear program and Libya's agreement to end its nuclear and chemical weapons program.

    "We have been engaged multilaterally with a number of countries to deal with this issue of weapons of mass destruction," Wood said.

    Wood said he also has not seen the Democrats' report. "I fundamentally reject the charge that the administration has made the world less safe from terrorism," he said.

    House Democrats also blasted Bush policy in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia as damaging to national security. U.S. efforts to combat terrorists in Pakistan have suffered because of "unyielding support for a military dictator"; Iraq has drained resources from the fight in Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia continues to serve "as a major source of terrorist activity," the Democrats' report states.

    The independent study, however, did credit the Bush administration with progress in a number of areas. It cited improved U.S. port security, reduction of military chemical stockpiles, increased U.S. funding for securing nuclear weapons sites in Russia and new international programs aimed at preventing crimes involving biological weapons.

  2. #2
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    36,648
    Post Thanks / Like
    Why worry?

    Terrorists don't have WMD's or any possible access to WMD's, and as Bitonti says, no Nation on Earth (other than the U.S.) would ever use a WMD in anger against us.

    So :zzz:

  3. #3
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,481
    Post Thanks / Like
    I think we need to improve border security, too.

  4. #4
    Waterboy
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    0
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE]"The administration has just failed to act in so many ways," said Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. "Let's say that we've been fortunate that we have not been attacked" since 2001, said Thompson, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee.[/QUOTE]

    ha... So not being attacked since 2001 has nothing to do with Bush's policies, we're just amazingly "lucky."

    Somehow I doubt that.

    And I thought liberals say the threat of terrorism is a made up warmongering tactic. What gives?

  5. #5
    Waterboy
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    0
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=SanAntonio_JetFan;2739696]I think we need to improve border security, too.[/QUOTE]

    Now THAT I agree with, and that is one issue the Bush admin. has failed on.

  6. #6
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,481
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=pauliec;2739701]And I thought liberals say the threat of terrorism is a made up warmongering tactic. What gives?[/QUOTE]


    It's ironic that Keith Olbermann was demoted the day after slamming the RNC for their 911 tribute.

    [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=124WAoqwKto"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=124WAoqwKto[/URL]


    And I know I'll get the typical, "oh, but, but O'Reilly, Hannity, Rush are just as bad". Well, that may be, but those guys aren't ANCHORING the campaign coverage, [B]posing[/B] as legitimate, unbiased journalists.

  7. #7
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    38,782
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Warfish;2739689]and as Bitonti says, no Nation on Earth (other than the U.S.) would ever use a WMD in anger against us.
    [/QUOTE]

    that's not what I said. what i said was World Leaders are not the same as suicidal terrorists. I also never said rogue WMD wasn't a problem what I said was sending infantry to occupy soverign nations isn't a solution to that problem.

    you should take notes from CBNY, he always quotes me verbatim.

  8. #8
    Waterboy
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    0
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=SanAntonio_JetFan;2739718]It's ironic that Keith Olbermann was demoted the day after slamming the RNC for their 911 tribute.

    [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=124WAoqwKto"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=124WAoqwKto[/URL]


    And I know I'll get the typical, "oh, but, but O'Reilly, Hannity, Rush are just as bad". Well, that may be, but those guys aren't ANCHORING the campaign coverage, [B]posing[/B] as legitimate, unbiased journalists.[/QUOTE]

    What a self-important piece of ****. Like he's the only one who lost friends or loved ones on that day.

    And don't even tell me he didn't bring that up to make a political point, to score a hit against the Republicans. What a douchebag.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,710
    Post Thanks / Like
    How much time was there between the two WTC attacks? 8 years? Getting around that time, I'm going to give Bush until his term is up before I make any judgments on that. His strategy is obviously weakening the enemy instead of making us less vulnerable. Hopefully the next president can start making up for that weakness and continue to weaken the enemy at the same time.
    Last edited by Sharrow; 09-09-2008 at 02:00 PM.

  10. #10
    All League
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    It's all relative
    Posts
    2,856
    Post Thanks / Like
    No, the US is safe from WMD attacks. We took out Saddam, remember?

  11. #11
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    14,349
    Post Thanks / Like
    Does anyone remember what the Attorney General, John Ashcroft was STILL more worried about after 9-11?

    PORN was #1 on his list to stop. Then terrorism.

    Truth hurts.

  12. #12
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    13,179
    Post Thanks / Like
    We have thousands of miles of borders and coastline, 1000's of planes coming into the country every day, container ships, private yachts, people on freaking inflated tires and you believe the Democrats are going to protect us? The only way we can secure this country is to lock it down and we can't and won't.

  13. #13
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Miami, Fl
    Posts
    18,661
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Winstonbiggs;2740270]We have thousands of miles of borders and coastline, 1000's of planes coming into the country every day, container ships, private yachts, people on freaking inflated tires and you believe the Democrats are going to protect us? The only way we can secure this country is to lock it down and we can't and won't.[/QUOTE]

    what's your point?

    its the dems fault that we still haven't addressed our open border problem?

  14. #14
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    13,179
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Mean Bro Green;2745868]what's your point?

    its the dems fault that we still haven't addressed our open border problem?[/QUOTE]

    Its no ones fault the fact that the Dems want to make an issue about something that physical can't be done without turning our country into a gulag is nonesense.

    I much prefer we keep our enemies from getting nukes, hunt down our enemies on their turf than turn the US into a large prison state.
    Last edited by Winstonbiggs; 09-12-2008 at 09:27 AM.

  15. #15
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Miami, Fl
    Posts
    18,661
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Winstonbiggs;2745932]Its no ones fault the fact that the Dems want to make an issue about something that physical can't be done without turning our country into a gulag is nonesense.

    I much prefer we keep our enemies from getting nukes, hunt down our enemies on their turf than turn the US into a large prison state.[/QUOTE]

    you lost me there brother

    are you saying that our border policy is a non issue because we cant do anything about it?

  16. #16
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    1,934
    Post Thanks / Like

    PDF of the report

    [url]http://www.psaonline.org/downloads/ReportCard%208-25-08.pdf[/url]

    for those who want to read it

  17. #17
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    13,179
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Mean Bro Green;2746296]you lost me there brother

    are you saying that our border policy is a non issue because we cant do anything about it?[/QUOTE]

    Yes which is why we need to deport illegals once we determine they're here.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us