Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: www.debunking911.com, arguments vs. conspiracy theorists:

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,162
    Post Thanks / Like

    www.debunking911.com, arguments vs. conspiracy theorists:

    This is for Press Coverage & his/her ilk....no one wants to take the time to argue with insane people like yourselves- so please refer to this comprehensive website for normal people's collective response to your psycho babble....

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,481
    Post Thanks / Like
    There are multiple flavors of 911 conspiracy theorists, just as there are multiple flavors in a box of Fruit Loops.

    The theories range from mild skepticism, to cynical, to paranoid, to outright nutjub moonbat.

    Using this range, people think the govt was either:

    1. incompetent
    2. negligent
    3. complicit
    4. active and willing participant


    I have no problem with 1. and 2. It's 3 and 4 that I have issue with.


    Complicity implies foreknowledge of the event and a willingness to let it happen. I've seen some things that suggest a knowledge that it would happen, but not anything that suggests [B]exactly[/B] when.

    Now, number 4. is for absolute nutjobs. These include the no-plane'ers, the controlled demolitionists, and the energy beamers (my personal favorite).

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    31,171
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=SanAntonio_JetFan;2748801]There are multiple flavors of 911 conspiracy theorists, just as there are multiple flavors in a box of Fruit Loops.

    The theories range from mild skepticism, to cynical, to paranoid, to outright nutjub moonbat.

    Using this range, people think the govt was either:

    1. incompetent
    2. negligent
    3. complicit
    4. active and willing participant


    I have no problem with 1. and 2. It's 3 and 4 that I have issue with.


    Complicity implies foreknowledge of the event and a willingness to let it happen. I've seen some things that suggest a knowledge that it would happen, but not anything that suggests [B]exactly[/B] when.

    Now, number 4. is for absolute nutjobs. These include the no-plane'ers, the controlled demolitionists, and the energy beamers (my personal favorite).[/QUOTE]

    Energy beamer?

  4. #4
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,481
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Tyler Durden;2748834]Energy beamer?[/QUOTE]

    [URL="http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/energybeam.html"]http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/energybeam.html[/URL]

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    31,171
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=SanAntonio_JetFan;2748851][URL="http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/energybeam.html"]http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/energybeam.html[/URL][/QUOTE]

    How many people believe this? 2?

  6. #6
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    LI
    Posts
    20,296
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Tyler Durden;2748872]How many people believe this? 2?[/QUOTE]

    Several thousand stormtroopers that live on the Death Star.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,123
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Tucker134;2748708]This is for Press Coverage & his/her ilk....no one wants to take the time to argue with insane people like yourselves- so please refer to this comprehensive website for normal people's collective response to your psycho babble....[/QUOTE]


    I love when a good little Bushie pretends his time is too valuable to man-up and deal with debating the biggest crime in U.S. history, and lazily points to a wesite in order to 1) misrepresent the argument and 2) have it do the work for him without alluding to anything specific.

    Sorry, but repeating "you're insane" over and over again isn't winning you the argument. Especially when you point to a web site that deals with MIHOP (made it happen) theory, and avoids LIPHOP (let it happen) almost entirely.

    Thermite, controlled demolitions, missiles and other silliness are not being debated here. NORAD, and Cheney/Rumsfeld's manipulation of NORAD's response, and muzzled FBI investigations, and gagged whistleblowers, and money trails to the ISI? Those are being debated. Something you clearly know nothing about, Tucker. But you go right ahead suggesting I'm the crazy one by pointing to an argument I've never made. Good job.

    BTW, Tucker, do you wear a bowtie?

  8. #8
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,494
    Post Thanks / Like
    Vince Foster was killed by the Clintons!!!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us