Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: Deposition of GOP Computer Security expert Spoonamore Admits Ohio Vote Theft in 2004

  1. #1
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473

    Deposition of GOP Computer Security expert Spoonamore Admits Ohio Vote Theft in 2004

    So even without the fruits of the poisonous tree, Bush's 2004 'election' was illegitimate? Figures! And that makes his 2 SC appointees invalid as well... not to mention all the damage he did at home and to the rest of the world.


    Oh yeah, and btw it'll be 51.2% for McCain and by 3 electoral votes if the GOP steals the third in a row... effing scumbags



    _________________________________________________




    Declaration of Stephen Spoonamore
    [address redacted]

    1. [B]I am a recognized expert in the field of electronic data security and digital network architecture. [/B]

    2. I have agreed to serve as an expert witness for the plaintiffs in the case of King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association before the United States District Court in Columbus, Ohio.

    3. I have served as the CEO and/or CTO of companies engaged in the design and development of digital systems. Including: CPR Group Inc., Cybrinth LLC, DuosTech Inc., SWN Communications, FreePlay Inc. and GSP inc.

    4. I have served in industry leadership positions in a number of professional organizations in the field of electronic data security and commerce, including but not limited to: Board Member of the AFEI (Association For Enterprise Integration) and Task Force Chairman, NECCC (National Electronic Commerce Coordination Commission) to establish digital identity rules for State Government Systems.

    5. [B]Digital Systems I have designed or consulted upon are currently serving to secure elements of: MasterCard, American Express, Chubb insurance, Bloomberg, Boeing, NBC-GE, NewsCorp, the US Department of Energy, The US Navy, The US Department of State and Other Government Agencies.[/B]

    6. [B]Because of my interest in data security and in democracy, I have followed with interest the security issues involved with electronic voting in United States.[/B] My understanding of the vulnerabilities of American elections to fraudulent manipulation is based upon conversations with professionals in election administration working within state governmental structures as well as information technology specialists working in private industry on a contract basis for state governments.

    7. I have agreed to function as an expert resource and witness for plaintiffs' counsel and the King Lincoln case in federal court in Ohio.

    8. [b]The opinions expressed below are held by me to a reasonable degree of certainty as understood within my professional area of expertise in the detection and prevention of fraud in data processing systems. [/b]

    In regard to the system set up to tabulate the vote in Ohio in 2004.

    1) The vote tabulation and reporting system, as initially designed, was supposed to allow each county central tabulator (Computer A) to add up local information locally, and then, via a lightly encrypted system, send the information to the Sec. of State statewide tabulator (Computer B). This system, while using public Internet and public information carrying capacity, could be compromised at the level of one county (Computer A is hacked) or in the transmission of any one county to the central state tabulator (Computer A talking to Computer B). However, it would only be possible to compromise the vote on a statewide basis by a compromise at the state level tabulator (Computer B is hacked). Alternately I have been told that these processes were replaced at the last minute by fax transmitted results.

    It is relatively simple to establish if the security of the transmissions, whether sent by fax, or by electronic transmission, by reviewing the network architecture as operated on election night, and review the session logs of the secretary of states central tabulation computer to determine the IP address and times of communication by other machines to the the Secretary. The variable nature of the story of what occurred, and lack of documentation available, would be cause to launch an immediate fraud investigation in any of my banking clients.

    2) The vote tabulation and reporting system, as modified at the direction of Mr. Blackwell, allowed the introduction of a single computer in the middle of the pathway. This computer located at a company principally managing IT Systems for GOP campaign and political operations (Computer C) received all information from each county computer (Computer A) BEFORE it was sent onward to Computer B. This centralized collection of all incoming statewide tabulations would make it extremely easy for a single operator, or a preprogrammed single "force balancing computer" to change the results in any way desired by the team controlling Computer C. In this case GOP partisan operatives. Again, if this out of state system had ANY digital access to the Secretary of States system it would be cause for immediate investigation by any of my banking clients.

    3) If scenario #2 described above is true, Computer C, was placed functionally in a central control position in the network, for Computer C to have even updated instructions for various tabulators at the county level (Computers A) to change their results at the county level. If this had happened, in order to cover up this fact, the hard drives of the county level tabulators would have to be pulled and destroyed, as they would have digital evidence of this hacking from Computer C. The efforts by the company in charge of these computers to pull out hard drives and destroy them in advance of the Green Party Recount from the 2004 election is a clear signal something was deliberately amiss with the county tabulators (Computers A).

    If even the presence of such a Computer C was found in a banking system, it would be cause to launch an immediate fraud investigation. This computer placement, in the middle of the network, is a defined type of attack. It is called a MIM (Man in the Middle) Attack. It is a common problem in the banking settlement space. A criminal gang will introduce a computer into the outgoing electronic systems of a major retail mall, or smaller branch office of a bank. They will capture the legitimate transactions and then add fraudulent charges to the system for their benefit.

    Another common MIM is the increasingly common "false" website attack. In this MIM, errors in the computers that feed the Digital Name Service are exploited directing an unsuspecting user to a site that looks like the one they wished to visit, but is in fact an "evil twin" which then exploits them for various purposes for a portion of the time, and then in many cases passes them on the CORRECT web site they wanted. Once passed on, the operators of the evil twin site may continue to exploit the user, or later duplicate the session and exploit them in another manner. Any time all information is directed to a single computer for consolidation, it is possible, and in fact likely, that single computer will exploit the information for some purpose.

    [B]In the case of Ohio 2004, the only purpose I can conceive for sending all county vote tabulations to a GOP managed Man-in-the-Middle site in Chattanooga BEFORE sending the results onward to the Sec. of State, would be to hack the vote at the MIM.
    [/B]


    IN REGARD TO THE DIEBOLD SYSTEMS, Formerly Global, DESI and now called Premier.

    [B]In my opinion, there is NO POSSIBLE WAY to make a secure touch screen voting system. None.[/B] Secure systems are predicated on establishing securely the identity of every user of the system. Voting is predicated on being anonymous. It is impossible to have a system that does both.

    It is possible to design relatively secure optical scan machines, but even these can be hacked in even the best of cases. In the case of optical scan you have the ability to recount manually the paper ballot itself, and the ability to spot check the machines for errors against a sample of hand recounting.

    Even considering no secure system for touch screen machines can be designed, ever, the Diebold system is riddled with exploitable errors. The SAIC report on the system architecture, commissioned by Maryland Gov. Erlich, outlined over 200 concerns. Many of these concerns are almost comical from the perspective of a computer architect. One example of this:

    The existence of negative fields being possible in some number fields. Voting machines as custom built computers which should be designed to begin at the number Zero, no votes, and advance only in increments of 1, one vote, until they max out at the most possible votes cast in one day. Perhaps 3000 voters could use a machine in one day, but more realistically 400 or so. There is no possible legitimate reason that NEGATIVE votes should ever be entered. And yet these machines are capable of having negative numbers programmed in, injected, or preloaded.

    IN REGARD to Mr. Mike Connell.

    Mr. Connell and I share a mutual interest in democracy building, freedom of speech and religion worldwide. We have mutually participated in activity to forward this goal. At a meeting in London last year, and again at a Lunch in Washington, DC, Mike and I briefly discussed voting security. [B]While he has not admitted to wrongdoing, and in my opinion he is not involved in voting theft, Mike clearly agrees that the electronic voting systems in the US are not secure. He further made a statement that he is afraid that some of the more ruthless partisans of the GOP, may have exploited systems he in part worked on for this purpose. [/B]

    Mr. Connell builds front end applications, user interfaces and web sites. Knowing his team and their skills, I find it unlikely they would be the vote thieves directly. [B]I believe however he knows who is doing that work, and has likely turned a blind eye to this activity. Mr. Connell is a devout Catholic. He has admitted to me that in his zeal to 'save the unborn' he may have helped others who have compromised elections. He was clearly uncomfortable when I asked directly about Ohio 2004.[/B]

    I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.



    Executed this 17th day of September 2008.
    Stephen Spoonamore
    Last edited by King Ryan; 10-01-2008 at 06:59 PM.

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    McCain/Palin will win by theft.
    [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lrFkRHrRDI[/url]

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    9,157
    [QUOTE=Tanginius;2781379]So even without the fruits of the poisonous tree, Bush's 2004 'election' was illegitimate? Figures! And that makes his 2 SC appointees invalid as well... not to mention all the damage he did at home and to the rest of the world.


    Oh yeah, and btw it'll be 51.2% for McCain and by 3 electoral votes if the GOP steals the third in a row... effing scumbags

    [/QUOTE]

    The difference between this election and 2004 is that this time the republicans don't have control of the entire state government of Ohio. The voters in Ohio kicked out Taft (the worst governor in the history of that state) and the inept, corrupt republicans in the state offices in 2006. We'll see what happens this year without corrupt republicans in charge of counting the votes in at least one swing state.

    Too bad Obama is still way too tan to win Ohio. Kerry probably won Ohio in 2004, like Gore won Florida in 2000. Problem is the dems have a candidate that middle America is not ready to accept yet.

  4. #4
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,917
    [QUOTE=Tanginius;2781379]So Oh yeah, and btw it'll be 51.2% for McCain and by 3 electoral votes if the GOP steals the third in a row... effing scumbags
    [/QUOTE]

    C'mon, Tan...you know this. Which candidate attended Bilderberg this year?

    Bush has Cheney...Obama has Biden...McCain has Palin(?!?!?)

    Who do you think is gonna win? You already know the answer...

  5. #5

  6. #6
    [QUOTE=Tanginius;2781379]Oh yeah, and btw it'll be 51.2% for McCain and by 3 electoral votes if the GOP steals the third in a row... effing scumbags
    [/QUOTE]

    I'm still curious why they didn't "steal" the last Congressional Election as well......

    I wonder when you'll start posting the dishonest ways the Dems cheat at electioneering too. Or are they not "scumbags" when they cheat?

    Nevermind.

  7. #7
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    [QUOTE=Warfish;2781558]I'm still curious why they didn't "steal" the last Congressional Election as well......

    I wonder when you'll start posting the dishonest ways the Dems cheat at electioneering too. Or are they not "scumbags" when they cheat?

    Nevermind.[/QUOTE]

    if you've got any evidence of them stealing elections, PLEASE POST IT!!!


    as for 2006, THEY DID... but all it could do was limit the damage (to 30+ losses lol). They saved some people's asses
    Last edited by King Ryan; 09-30-2008 at 09:35 AM.

  8. #8
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    [QUOTE=PlumberKhan;2781527]C'mon, Tan...you know this. Which candidate attended Bilderberg this year?

    Bush has Cheney...Obama has Biden...McCain has Palin(?!?!?)

    Who do you think is gonna win? You already know the answer...[/QUOTE]


    Personally I do think that Obama is their man as well... and that he's due to be installed

  9. #9
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    LI
    Posts
    20,508
    How about some links? Just so we know these didn't come from derangedleftists.com. :rolleyes:

  10. #10
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    [QUOTE=quantum;2781612]How about some links? Just so we know these didn't come from derangedleftists.com. :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

    I'll find it, although a simple google search of Spoonamore brings up plenty of links on the topic.

    This deposition is part of a case in OH from 2004 and 2006 which had it's stay lifted and is moving forward

  11. #11
    1. That document is a DECLARATION, not a DEPOSITION.

    2. It is OPINION, not FACT. Nothing in the document evidences that the DECLARANT had first hand knowledge of vote theft. If he did, he would be a FACT WITNESS, not an EXPERT WITNESS.

    3.As an EXPERT WITNESS, the declarant is no more than a hired gun, paid to take a position consistent with position of the plaintiff.

    4. His conclusion re: "hacking" is PURE SPECULATION -- thus his so-called OPINION is UNINFORMED and INCOMPETENT. His statements re: Mr. Connell (whoever he is) may be LIBELOUS. The so-called EXPERT's positions are contaminated by the evident disdain and prejudice he holds regarding Mr. Connell's religious beliefs. Why would any lawyer in his or her right mind ever allow such trash to find its way into an expert declaration?

    5. the truth comes out on CROSS EXAMINATION.

    why haven't you bothered to post the cross?
    Last edited by nyahay bus; 09-30-2008 at 10:05 AM.

  12. #12
    [QUOTE=Tanginius;2781609]as for 2006, THEY DID... but all it could do was limit the damage (to 30+ losses lol). They saved some people's asses[/QUOTE]

    You should start a Revolution. Take Back Democracy Now!

    I suggest Tri-Cornered Tin-Foil hats.

    They'll look smashing with your offical "I Brake for Wookies" T-shirts.

  13. #13
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    [QUOTE=Warfish;2781657]You should start a Revolution. Take Back Democracy Now!

    I suggest Tri-Cornered Tin-Foil hats.

    They'll look smashing with your offical "I Brake for Wookies" T-shirts.[/QUOTE]


    pull the wool down further, it's only down to your ankles... you can probably almost see a hint of light down near your feet which is able to get in past it

  14. #14
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    [QUOTE=nyahay bus;2781643]1. That document is a DECLARATION, not a DEPOSITION.

    2. It is OPINION, not FACT. Nothing in the document evidences that the DECLARANT had first hand knowledge of vote theft. If he did, he would be a FACT WITNESS, not an EXPERT WITNESS.

    3.As an EXPERT WITNESS, the declarant is no more than a hired gun, paid to take a position consistent with position of the plaintiff.

    4. His conclusion re: "hacking" is PURE SPECULATION -- thus his so-called OPINION is UNINFORMED and INCOMPETENT. His statements re: Mr. Connell (whoever he is) may be LIBELOUS. The so-called EXPERT's positions are contaminated by the evident disdain and prejudice he holds regarding Mr. Connell's religious beliefs. Why would any lawyer in his or her right mind ever allow such trash to find its way into an expert declaration?

    5. the truth comes out on CROSS EXAMINATION.

    why haven't you bothered to post the cross?[/QUOTE]

    What are your thoughts on the GOP designed MIM system for their election counting?

    Is it wise to have all precincts send their data from OH to TN to a server farm there and then have the data sent from TN back to OH?

    What if I added the facts that the server farm in TN is a huge GOP supporter and managed the GWB43.com website which, as you know, the Bush administration illegally used to evade investigation and tracking that is required because they didn't use the whitehouse.gov
    system???


    I'm sure it's just a coincidence, right? :rolleyes:

  15. #15
    [QUOTE=Tanginius;2781677]pull the wool down further, it's only down to your ankles... you can probably almost see a hint of light down near your feet which is able to get in past it[/QUOTE]

    I can't wait to see you "take back democracy".

    The Revolution will not be televised.

    Funny how only one party cheats......maybe we should send all the Republicans to Guantanamo!

    Selected Not Elected!

    No Blood For Oil!

    No More Illegal War!

    Hell No, We Won't Go!

    Ect.

    You really are my hero Tan.

  16. #16
    [QUOTE=Tanginius;2781728]What are your thoughts on the GOP designed MIM system for their election counting?

    Is it wise to have all precincts send their data from OH to TN to a server farm there and then have the data sent from TN back to OH?

    What if I added the facts that the server farm in TN is a huge GOP supporter and managed the GWB43.com website which, as you know, the Bush administration illegally used to evade investigation and tracking that is required because they didn't use the whitehouse.gov
    system???


    I'm sure it's just a coincidence, right? :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

    You must have missed the part where he says "[B]If [/B]scenario #2 described above is true." and "If this had happened".

    This guy has no knowledge whatsoever as to what happened. His opinions are meaningless.
    Last edited by nyahay bus; 09-30-2008 at 12:04 PM.

  17. #17
    We really have to move on with this whole 2004 election thing. It doesn't do any good; it serves no purpose.

  18. #18
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Long Island & Section 337
    Posts
    4,859
    [IMG]http://www.rottenacorn.com/images/activityMap.gif[/IMG]

    [B]Where is the outrage about ACORN?[/B]

    Recent Fraud

    State Year Details
    AR 1998 A contractor with ACORN-affiliated Project Vote was arrested for falsifying about 400 voter registration cards.
    CO 2004 An ACORN employee admitted to forging signatures and registering three of her friends to vote 40 times.
    2005 Two ex-ACORN employees were convicted in Denver of perjury for submitting false voter registrations.
    FL 2004 A Florida Department of Law Enforcement spokesman said ACORN was “singled out” among suspected voter registration groups for a 2004 wage initiative because it was “the common thread” in the agency’s fraud investigations.
    MI 2004 The Detroit Free Press reported that “overzealous or unscrupulous campaign workers in several Michigan counties are under investigation for voter-registration fraud, suspected of attempting to register nonexistent people or forging applications for already-registered voters.” ACORN-affiliate Project Vote was one of two groups suspected of turning in the documents.
    MO 2007 Four ACORN employees were indicted in Kansas City for charges including identity theft and filing false registrations during the 2006 election.
    2006 Eight ACORN employees in St. Louis were indicted on federal election fraud charges. Each of the eight faces up to five years in prison for forging signatures and submitting false information.
    2003 Of 5,379 voter registration cards ACORN submitted in St. Louis, only 2,013 of those appeared to be valid. At least 1,000 are believed to be attempts to register voters illegally.
    NC 2004 North Carolina officials investigated ACORN for submitting fake voter registration cards.
    NM 2005 Four ACORN employees submitted as many as 3,000 potentially fraudulent signatures on the group’s Albuquerque ballot initiative. A local sheriff added: “It’s safe to say the forgery was widespread.”
    2004 An ACORN employee registered a 13-year-old boy to vote. Citing this and other examples, New Mexico State Representative Joe Thompson stated that ACORN was “manufacturing voters” throughout New Mexico.
    OH 2007 A man in Reynoldsburg was indicted on two felony counts of illegal voting and false registration, after being registered by ACORN to vote in two separate counties.
    2004 A grand jury indicted a Columbus ACORN worker for submitting a false signature and false voter registration form. In Franklin County, two ACORN workers submitted what the director of the board of election supervisors called “blatantly false” forms. In Cuyahoga County, ACORN and its affiliate Project Vote submitted registration cards that had the highest rate of errors for any voter registration group.
    MN 2004 During a traffic stop, police found more than 300 voter registration cards in the trunk of a former ACORN employee, who had violated a legal requirements that registration cards be submitted to the Secretary of State within 10 days of being filled out and signed.
    PA 2008 An ACORN employee in West Reading, PA, was sentenced to up to 23 months in prison for identity theft and tampering with records. A second ACORN worker pleaded not guilty to the same charges and is free on $10,000 bail.
    2004 Reading’s Director of Elections received calls from numerous individuals complaining that ACORN employees deliberately put inaccurate information on their voter registration forms. The Berks County director of elections said voter fraud was “absolutely out of hand,” and added: “Not only do we have unintentional duplication of voter registration but we have blatant duplicate voter registrations.” The Berks County deputy director of elections added that ACORN was under investigation by the Department of Justice.
    TX 2004 ACORN turned in the voter registration form of David Young, who told reporters “The signature is not my signature. It’s not even close.” His social security number and date of birth were also incorrect.
    VA 2005 In 2005, the Virginia State Board of Elections admonished Project Vote and ACORN for turning in a significant number of faulty voter registrations. An audit revealed that 83% of sampled registrations that were rejected for carrying false or questionable information were submitted by Project Vote. Many of these registrations carried social security numbers that exist for other people, listed non-existent or commercial addresses, or were for convicted felons in violation of state and federal election law.

    In a letter to ACORN, the State Board of Elections reported that 56% of the voter registration applications ACORN turned in were ineligible. Further, a full 35% were not submitted in a timely manner, as required by law. The State Board of Elections also commented on what appeared to be evidence of intentional voter fraud. "Additionally,” they wrote, “information appears to have been altered on some applications where information given by the applicant in one color ink has been scratched through and re-entered in another color ink. Any alteration of a voter registration application is a Class 5 Felony in accordance with § 24.2-1009 of the Code of Virginia."
    WA 2007 Three ACORN employees pleaded guilty, and four more were charged, in the worst case of voter registration fraud in Washington state history. More than 2,000 fraudulent voter registration cards were submitted by the group during a voter registration drive.
    WI 2004 The district attorney’s office investigated seven voter registration applications Project Vote employees filed in the names of people who said the group never contacted them. Former Project Vote employee Robert Marquise Blakely told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he had not met with any of the people whose voter registration applications he signed, “an apparent violation of state law,” according to the paper.



    [url]http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html[/url]

  19. #19
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    [QUOTE=HDCentStOhio;2781882][IMG]http://www.rottenacorn.com/images/activityMap.gif[/IMG]

    [B]Where is the outrage about ACORN?[/B]

    Recent Fraud

    State Year Details
    AR 1998 A contractor with ACORN-affiliated Project Vote was arrested for falsifying about 400 voter registration cards.
    CO 2004 An ACORN employee admitted to forging signatures and registering three of her friends to vote 40 times.
    2005 Two ex-ACORN employees were convicted in Denver of perjury for submitting false voter registrations.
    FL 2004 A Florida Department of Law Enforcement spokesman said ACORN was “singled out” among suspected voter registration groups for a 2004 wage initiative because it was “the common thread” in the agency’s fraud investigations.
    MI 2004 The Detroit Free Press reported that “overzealous or unscrupulous campaign workers in several Michigan counties are under investigation for voter-registration fraud, suspected of attempting to register nonexistent people or forging applications for already-registered voters.” ACORN-affiliate Project Vote was one of two groups suspected of turning in the documents.
    MO 2007 Four ACORN employees were indicted in Kansas City for charges including identity theft and filing false registrations during the 2006 election.
    2006 Eight ACORN employees in St. Louis were indicted on federal election fraud charges. Each of the eight faces up to five years in prison for forging signatures and submitting false information.
    2003 Of 5,379 voter registration cards ACORN submitted in St. Louis, only 2,013 of those appeared to be valid. At least 1,000 are believed to be attempts to register voters illegally.
    NC 2004 North Carolina officials investigated ACORN for submitting fake voter registration cards.
    NM 2005 Four ACORN employees submitted as many as 3,000 potentially fraudulent signatures on the group’s Albuquerque ballot initiative. A local sheriff added: “It’s safe to say the forgery was widespread.”
    2004 An ACORN employee registered a 13-year-old boy to vote. Citing this and other examples, New Mexico State Representative Joe Thompson stated that ACORN was “manufacturing voters” throughout New Mexico.
    OH 2007 A man in Reynoldsburg was indicted on two felony counts of illegal voting and false registration, after being registered by ACORN to vote in two separate counties.
    2004 A grand jury indicted a Columbus ACORN worker for submitting a false signature and false voter registration form. In Franklin County, two ACORN workers submitted what the director of the board of election supervisors called “blatantly false” forms. In Cuyahoga County, ACORN and its affiliate Project Vote submitted registration cards that had the highest rate of errors for any voter registration group.
    MN 2004 During a traffic stop, police found more than 300 voter registration cards in the trunk of a former ACORN employee, who had violated a legal requirements that registration cards be submitted to the Secretary of State within 10 days of being filled out and signed.
    PA 2008 An ACORN employee in West Reading, PA, was sentenced to up to 23 months in prison for identity theft and tampering with records. A second ACORN worker pleaded not guilty to the same charges and is free on $10,000 bail.
    2004 Reading’s Director of Elections received calls from numerous individuals complaining that ACORN employees deliberately put inaccurate information on their voter registration forms. The Berks County director of elections said voter fraud was “absolutely out of hand,” and added: “Not only do we have unintentional duplication of voter registration but we have blatant duplicate voter registrations.” The Berks County deputy director of elections added that ACORN was under investigation by the Department of Justice.
    TX 2004 ACORN turned in the voter registration form of David Young, who told reporters “The signature is not my signature. It’s not even close.” His social security number and date of birth were also incorrect.
    VA 2005 In 2005, the Virginia State Board of Elections admonished Project Vote and ACORN for turning in a significant number of faulty voter registrations. An audit revealed that 83% of sampled registrations that were rejected for carrying false or questionable information were submitted by Project Vote. Many of these registrations carried social security numbers that exist for other people, listed non-existent or commercial addresses, or were for convicted felons in violation of state and federal election law.

    In a letter to ACORN, the State Board of Elections reported that 56% of the voter registration applications ACORN turned in were ineligible. Further, a full 35% were not submitted in a timely manner, as required by law. The State Board of Elections also commented on what appeared to be evidence of intentional voter fraud. "Additionally,” they wrote, “information appears to have been altered on some applications where information given by the applicant in one color ink has been scratched through and re-entered in another color ink. Any alteration of a voter registration application is a Class 5 Felony in accordance with § 24.2-1009 of the Code of Virginia."
    WA 2007 Three ACORN employees pleaded guilty, and four more were charged, in the worst case of voter registration fraud in Washington state history. More than 2,000 fraudulent voter registration cards were submitted by the group during a voter registration drive.
    WI 2004 The district attorney’s office investigated seven voter registration applications Project Vote employees filed in the names of people who said the group never contacted them. Former Project Vote employee Robert Marquise Blakely told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he had not met with any of the people whose voter registration applications he signed, “an apparent violation of state law,” according to the paper.



    [url]http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html[/url][/QUOTE]



    As bad as that list is, and it's bad, I don't see anything near the level of stealing enough electoral votes to steal an election... TWICE

  20. #20
    [QUOTE=Tanginius;2781892]As bad as that list is, and it's bad, I don't see anything near the level of stealing enough electoral votes to steal an election... TWICE[/QUOTE]

    Pwned.:rolleyes:

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us