Follows the lib-style JI double standard - its OK for you to be angry about the GOP / things you dont like / the hypothetical and imaginary, but not OK for GOPers to be mad at Democrats / real life lib abuses
Trading in anger, hatred, fear? Thats the audaciously hopeful lib playbook.
B. Kliban: "And did I mention he's black?" Said it right down the street from you too.
Get yourself a new alarm clock, the date is stuck on 9/10/01.
You're not making any sense. In this thread I have ripped both parties.
Our conversations on a Jets message board in a subsection about politics will have absolutely no bearing on who our next president will be. You have chosen your affiliation for a reason and I have no questions about that. It seems that everyone has to defend their party's decisions as if admitting deficiency will strengthen the opposition.
My question is: why can't we see the strengths of the opposition as well as the weaknesses of your chosen party?
I could no longer identify myself as a Republican, but I don't see myself as a Democrat, so I became unaffiliated. I agree and disagree with both sides.
Iím guessing if youíre a party member there is something you identify with the party that has a polar opposite philosophy that you despise in the opposing party.