Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: U.S. reaction to Canadian coalition

  1. #1
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    6,882

    U.S. reaction to Canadian coalition

    OTTAWA - The whole world is watching and our closest ally - the United States - is worried as Canada goes through a "constitutional psychodrama," Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said Tuesday.


    Cannon told the Commons he expected president-elect Barack Obama's nominee for secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, to ask about the stability of Canada's government. He is hoping to have his first conversation with Clinton on Wednesday.


    "Is there someone in this chamber who thinks that our most important commercial partner and our most faithful ally is not worried about what is going on?" he asked.


    The Bush administration's envoy to Canada, Ambassador David Wilkins, said he was watching the tempest, but not unduly unnerved by it.


    Wilkins said he hasn't spoken to the White House about the crisis and didn't know if he would raise the issue during a farewell visit with President George W. Bush later this week.


    "Cables go down to the State Department on current events," he said in Regina. "I'm sure cables have gone down on this."


    Cannon said the scenario of an NDP-Liberal coalition supported by the Bloc Quebecois replacing Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives is befuddling to the international community.


    "This, Mr. Speaker, is not a scenario that is easy to explain to our allies and our partners who are striving mightily to achieve economic prosperity through political stability."


    But if our allies were seeking explanations of the contretemps, few were willing to say so.


    A spokesperson for the Queen would not go anywhere near the issue, refusing to say if Canada's head of state was paying attention to what was going on in its former colony.


    "I've spoken to the people on our side and the only line I can give you is that this is all a matter for the Canadian government," said a spokeswoman for Buckingham Palace.


    Canada is forging deep ties with Afghanistan, where 2,500 Canadian troops are fighting a Taliban insurgency. Two of the parties that would toss out the Conservatives have called for those troops to be immediately withdrawn.


    But a representative of the Afghanistan embassy said the ambassador refused to comment.


    The French embassy is also closely watching the unprecedented developments in Ottawa, according an embassy spokesman.


    But the embassy's press counsellor Jean-Christophe Fleury would not comment further.


    "We have to remain neutral when it comes to all political developments in Canada," he said.


    Cannon suggested that foreign investors who are choosing where to invest internationally may be hesitant to do so in Canada as a result of the country's uncertain political future.

    "Put yourself in the place of a foreign investor wondering which among many countries might provide the best return," Cannon said.

    Jacqueline Best, a specialist in international political economy at the University of Ottawa, disagreed.
    I know this is about Canada, but this is important news, considering our closeness in distance and in economic ties...also, Canada WAS one of the countries that, so far, had been of the countries least affected by the world financial crisis...

    [B]Canada expects U.S. queries about stability [/B]

    The coalition has promised an economic stimulus package that includes infrastructure spending, home construction, renovations and financial support for "struggling sectors" that can demonstrate a viable business plan.

    "I think that will make up for any short-term uncertainties that the market can have," Best said.

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been encouraging countries to take action to prevent a worldwide recession, said Best.

    "What the coalition is proposing is more in line with the global norms than what Harper was initially proposing," she said.

    "It's the same kind of policies the International Monetary Fund is taking."

  2. #2
    The U.S. just wants to know, "Is there a problem that is going to affect us?" Cripes, we've had to deal with Trudeau et al since the 70's, so we're used to a hostile government in Canada. A bigger problem would be the Quebecois taking their province and seceding. The rest is noise (unless you do your best Chavez imitation and invite the Russian fleet to port) By the way, I went to a Bruins game this past week and saw from the arena two Canadian warships in port...we don't allow the Russians to do that.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us