Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: More Than 160 U.S. and NATO Vehicles Burned in Pakistan

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East of the Jordan, West of the Rock of Gibraltar
    Posts
    4,798

    More Than 160 U.S. and NATO Vehicles Burned in Pakistan

    [URL="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-AS-Pakistan.html?_r=1&ref=world"]NY TIMES[/URL]

    [QUOTE]December 7, 2008

    More Than 160 U.S. and NATO Vehicles Burned in Pakistan

    By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Filed at 9:35 a.m. ET

    PESHAWAR, Pakistan (AP) -- Gunmen blasted their way into two transport terminals in Pakistan on Sunday and torched more than 160 vehicles destined for U.S.-led troops in Afghanistan, in the biggest assault yet on a vital military supply line, officials said.

    The U.S. military said its losses in the raid near the northwestern city of Peshawar would have ''minimal'' impact on anti-Taliban operations, set to expand with the arrival of thousands more American troops next year.

    However, the attack will fuel concern that insurgents are trying to choke the route through the famed Khyber Pass, which carries up to 70 percent of the supplies for Western forces in landlocked Afghanistan, and drive up the cost of the war.

    The owner of one of the terminals hit Sunday denied government claims that security was boosted after a raid last month near the pass in which militants made off with one Humvee and later paraded it before journalists.

    ''We don't feel safe here at all,'' Kifayatullah Khan told The Associated Press next to the still-smouldering vehicles, predicting that most of his night watchmen would now quit their jobs out of fear. ''It is almost impossible for us to continue with this business.''

    The attack at the Portward Logistic Terminal reduced a section of the vast walled compound to a smoldering junkyard.

    Khan said armed men flattened the gate before dawn with a rocket-propelled grenade, fatally shot a guard and set fire to a total of 106 vehicles, including about 70 Humvees.

    Humvees are thought to cost about $100,000 each, though the price varies widely depending on armor and other equipment, meaning Sunday's losses may exceed $10 million.

    An Associated Press reporter who visited the depot saw six rows of destroyed Humvees and military trucks packed close together, some on flatbed trailers, all of them gutted and twisted by the flames.

    Khan said shipping documents showed they were destined for U.S. forces and the Western-trained Afghan National Army.

    The attackers fled after a brief exchange of fire with police, who arrived about 40 minutes later, he said.

    The nine other guards who were on duty but stood helplessly aside put the number of assailants at 300, Khan said, though police official Kashif Alam said there were only 30.

    At the nearby Faisal depot, manager Shah Iran said 60 vehicles destined for Afghanistan as well as three Pakistani trucks were burned in a similar assault.

    The attack was the latest in a series that have highlighted the vulnerability of the supply route to the spreading power of the Taliban and other Islamic militants in the border region.

    Vast quantities of supplies pass through Pakistan after being unloaded from ships at the Arabian sea port of Karachi. Some is routed through Quetta toward the Afghan city of Kandahar, but most flows through the Khyber Pass toward Kabul and the huge U.S. air base at Bagram.

    The U.S. military in Afghanistan said in a statement that an unspecified number of its containers were destroyed in Sunday's attack but that their loss would have ''minimal effect on our operations.''

    ''It's militarily insignificant,'' U.S. spokeswoman Lt. Col. Rumi Nielsen-Green said. ''You can't imagine the volume of supplies that come through there and elsewhere and other ways.''

    ''So far there hasn't been a significant loss or impact to our mission,'' she said.

    Still, NATO has been seeking an alternative route through Central Asia, which it acknowledges is more expensive.

    Pakistan halted traffic through the Khyber Pass for several days in November while it arranged for troops to guard the slow-moving convoys.

    Shahedullah Baig, a spokesman for the interior minister in Islamabad, insisted Sunday that the extra security covered the terminals.

    ''They are fully protected, but in this kind of situation such incidents happen,'' Baig said.

    However, Khan, the depot manager, said that was untrue, and there were only a handful of lightly armed police at the targeted terminals on Sunday afternoon.

    Peshawar has seen a surge in violence in recent weeks, including the slaying of an American working on a U.S.-funded aid project.

    The city lies close to the lawless tribal regions along the Afghan border, where Osama bin Laden and other top al-Qaida leaders are believed to be hiding.

    On Saturday, a car bomb detonated in a busy market area of the city, killing 29 people and injuring 100 more. The blast wrecked a Shiite Muslim mosque and a hotel, but the motive and culprits remained unclear.

    The instability in Pakistan's northwest coincides with serious tensions with its eastern neighbor India in the wake of recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai.

    New Delhi blames the attack, which killed 171 people, on an Islamic militant group fighting Indian rule in the disputed Kashmir region, heightening tension between the nuclear-armed neighbors that could distract Pakistan from its role in helping the U.S. fight terrorism.

    ------

    Associated Press writers Zarar Khan in Islamabad and Heidi Vogt and Jason Straziuso in Kabul contributed to this report. [/QUOTE]

  2. #2
    Obama promised during the campaign to draw down from Iraq in 16 months from the day he takes office, and to reallocate much of our forces to the (more legitimate and vital, he and his side said) theatre of Afganistan.

    Hopefully, if he does what he promised, Iraq will remain as stable as they are today, and we can make more progress in Afganistan.

    Again, it needs be said......only a fool (Bush in this case) wages War in two front if he doesn't have to. His biggest failure by far was entering War in Iraq before finishing the job in Afganistan. Had he done that, the world today could be a much different place IMO.

  3. #3
    All League
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East of the Jordan, West of the Rock of Gibraltar
    Posts
    4,798
    [QUOTE=Warfish;2896650]...
    Again, it needs be said......only a fool (Bush in this case) wages War in two front if he doesn't have to. His biggest failure by far was entering War in Iraq before finishing the job in Afganistan. Had he done that, the world today could be a much different place IMO...[/QUOTE]

    I agree. I think we would also have a President who is a member of the Republican Party.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us