Enjoy an Ads-Free Jets Insider - Become a Jets Insider VIP!
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Madoff Fraud and the U.S. Government Debt Ponzi Scheme (Good Call Vilma)

  1. #1
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Madoff Fraud and the U.S. Government Debt Ponzi Scheme (Good Call Vilma)

    Good call Vilma on calling out S.S. as the largest Ponzi scheme... it seems some experts agree...

    [QUOTE]As the multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by Wall Street insider Bernard Madoff unravels in the media spotlight, the nation is being presented with a rare opportunity to understand the true nature of many of our most cherished financial structures. Hopefully we have the wisdom to connect the dots.

    Although the $50 billion loss engineered by Madoff is truly a staggering accomplishment (and was done using old-fashioned fraud rather than the mathematical wizardry that has characterized Wall Street’s recent larcenies) the size of the scheme pales in comparison to the multi-trillion dollar Ponzi structures run by the United States government. In fact, rather than looking to jail Madoff, President-elect Obama should consider making him our new Treasury Secretary. If not that, at least make him the czar of something!

    Madoff’s inspiration came from Charles Ponzi, the Italian-born American immigrant who promoted an investment plan in the early 1900s’ that traded postal coupons. Rather than paying investors from legitimate investment returns, Ponzi hit upon the innovative idea of paying out early investors with money collected from new investors. By creating an illusion of success, interest in his investment plan ballooned. Over time the schemes have become known by many other names, such as chain letters or pyramid schemes. They are united by the fact that they always fail in the end.

    When the influx of new investors inevitably slows to the point where distributions to current investors can no longer be maintained, investors look to withdraw funds. When this happens, the entire structure falls apart. The profits received by those who “invested” early as well as any funds skimmed off by the promoter, are offset by all the losses of those who came late to the party.

    To a large extent, the same concept has driven the major asset bubbles of the last decade. Given the ridiculously high valuations seen by tech stocks and real estate during their respective booms, the only way the bubbles could be perpetuated was if newer “investors” could be found to pay even more outrageous prices (the greater fool). But when these new buyers balked, the whole structure crumbled. Although there was no Ponzi or Madoff to orchestrate these manias, the entire financial and economic apparatus of the country had successfully convinced the public that “investments” in tech stocks and condominiums were bullet proof and that the supply of new buyers was endless.

    Unfortunately, the Ponzi economy doesn’t stop there. A chain letter is no more viable when run by governments than when run by private citizens. However, government orchestrated pyramids have the advantage of required participation. As a result, they can maintain the illusion of viability for several generations. But the longer such schemes operate the larger will be the losses when they ultimately collapse.

    The Social Security Administration runs its “trust funds” with precisely the same methods used by Madoff and Ponzi. As money is collected by from current workers, the funds are then dispersed to those already receiving benefits. None of the funds collected are actually invested, so no investment returns are ever generated. Those currently paying into the system are expected to receive their returns based on the “contribution” made by future workers. This is the classic definition of a Ponzi scheme. The only difference is that Ponzi didn’t own a printing press.

    The United States Government runs its own balance sheet based on the Ponzi principal as well. Our national debt always grows and never shrinks. As existing debt matures, proceeds are repaid by issuing new debt. Interest payments on existing debt are also made by selling new debt to investors. The whole scheme depends on an ever growing supply of new lenders, or the willingness of existing lenders, to continue to roll over maturing notes. Of course, as was the case with Madoff, if enough of our creditors want their money back, the music stops playing.

    In Madoff’s case, the rug pulling was provided by the huge financial losses suffered by some of his clients in other non-Madoff investments. When enough of these clients looked to sell some of their apparently well-performing Madoff assets to help offset such losses, the scam collapsed. The same thing could befall the United States Government. Now that China and our other creditors are looking to spend some of their U.S. Treasury holdings to stimulate their own economies, look for a similar outcome with even more dire implications.

    The main difference is that while Madoff took elaborate steps to conceal his scheme, the U.S. government operates in broad daylight. It truly is amazing how faith in government is so pervasive that many can believe that politicians will succeed where private individuals fail, and that governments are somehow immune to the economic laws that govern the rest of society. Like those unfortunate to have been duped by Madoff and Ponzi, the world is in for a rude awakening.

    For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.” Click here to order a copy today.

    For an updated look at his investment strategy order a copy of his just released book ‘The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets.” Click here to order your copy now .

    By Peter Schiff
    Euro Pacific Capital
    [url]http://www.europac.net/[/url] [/QUOTE]

  2. #2
    All League
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,403
    Post Thanks / Like
    excellent point.
    if you think Madoff was running a huge ponzi scheme, it pales in comparison to the ponzi scheme of social security

  3. #3
    Board Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn Heights
    Posts
    2,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks for the props Jef.

    I've always loved Peter Shif (no homo) and he makes a great case.

    Sadly, his words always fall on deaf ears. This country is so screwed. I feel bad for future generations, mainly because nothing will be done to truly change this system of greed and corruption.....

  4. #4
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Not bababooey and I resent the implication
    Posts
    21,029
    Post Thanks / Like
    No offense to Vilma, but wasn't this common knowledge (SS is a forced ponzi scheme?)

  5. #5
    Board Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn Heights
    Posts
    2,462
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=CTM;2917262]No offense to Vilma, but wasn't this common knowledge (SS is a forced ponzi scheme?)[/QUOTE]

    None taken, I just put it out there a couple days on the board, nice to see some prominent people (Schiff) publicly acknowledging said....

  6. #6
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Montville, NJ
    Posts
    5,473
    Post Thanks / Like
    Like I said to Vilma in the other thread... it can't be a Ponzi scheme because with SS, you know you're getting screwed! :steamin:


    that being said, there are some obvious similarities between the two :(

  7. #7
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Not bababooey and I resent the implication
    Posts
    21,029
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=Vilma;2917286]None taken, I just put it out there a couple days on the board, nice to see some prominent people (Schiff) publicly acknowledging said....[/QUOTE]
    :D

    I just don't understand why it needed to be acknowledged, new "investors" pay for the first "investors"

  8. #8
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    15,550
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=CTM;2917262]No offense to Vilma, but wasn't this common knowledge (SS is a forced ponzi scheme?)[/QUOTE]

    Eh, if enough people knew that SS was mismanaged, they'd demand more reform. At the very least, the SS funds should not be touched by any other "obligation." Anyone who argues that SS contributions should be spent for anything other than SS is not all there.

  9. #9
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Not bababooey and I resent the implication
    Posts
    21,029
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=BrooklynBound;2917758]Eh, if enough people knew that SS was mismanaged, they'd demand more reform. At the very least, the SS funds should not be touched by any other "obligation." Anyone who argues that SS contributions should be spent for anything other than SS is not all there.[/QUOTE]

    Eh, I have doubts. most people hate republican administration and democratic Congress equally, yet still vote for 1 of the 2 parties...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us