Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Life on Mars?

  1. #1

    Life on Mars?

    [QUOTE]Fossilized Bacteria May Point to Life on Mars
    Monday, November 30, 2009

    NASA scientists have produced the most compelling evidence yet that bacterial life exists on Mars.

    It showed that microscopic worm-like structures found in a Martian meteorite that hit the Earth 13,000 years ago are almost certainly fossilized bacteria. The so-called bio-morphs are embedded beneath the surface layers of the rock, suggesting that they were already present when the meteorite arrived, rather than being the result of subsequent contamination by Earthly bacteria.

    "This is very strong evidence of life on Mars," said David Mackay, a senior scientist at the NASA Johnson Space Center, who was part of the team of scientists that originally investigated the meteorite when it was discovered in 1984.

    In a 1996 study of the sample, Dr Mackay and others argued that the microfossils were evidence of life, but sceptics dismissed the claims, saying that similar-shaped structures might not be biological. The new analyses, the product of high resolution electron microscopy, make a strong case for the Allan Hills 84001 Meteorite having carried Martian life to Earth. The microscopes were focused on tiny magnetite crystals present in the surface layers of the meteorite, which have the form of simple bacteria. Some argued that these could be the result of a carbonate breaking down in the heat of the impact.

    The new analyses show that this is very unlikely to have resulted in the kinds of structures seen in the rock. Close examination suggested that about 25 percent of the crystal structures were chemically consistent with being formed from bacteria.

    "We feel vindicated. We’ve shown the alternate explanation is absolutely incorrect, leading us back to our original position that these structures are formed by bacteria on Mars," Dr Mackay said.

    Dennis Bazylinski, an astrobiologist from the University of Nevada who peer-reviewed the findings, said: "Until now I was on the fence but this paper has really thrown out the non-biological explanation." However, he added that the study was not a "smoking gun" for life on Mars. "One meteorite is never going to answer such a complex question," he said.[/QUOTE]

    .

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    3,842
    Someone had to do it...

    [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-wvgmZxbe8[/url]

  3. #3
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    13,041
    Personally, I'd rather we spend millions exploring the rest of the earth, jungles and deep sea. I'm sure the cure to cancer is on earth but we're too concerned about finding bacteria elsewhere in the universe.

  4. #4
    Great news.

  5. #5
    Where do you think DWC2 is from?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us