Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Report: Raiders' first pick in demand

  1. #1
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    717
    Post Thanks / Like

    Report: Raiders' first pick in demand

    http://theredzone.org/BlogDescriptio...d/Default.aspx

    Hmmm, think Tanny is up to his old tricks?

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,489
    Post Thanks / Like
    No.

    That would be horrific.

  3. #3
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    2,793
    Post Thanks / Like
    I hope not. Pick 8 IMHO is no man's land (too much of a reach to grab players we could use, not soon enough to land one of the top players like Suh or McCoy).

  4. #4
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Big Apple, USA
    Posts
    22,030
    Post Thanks / Like
    don't think that the 58 and the 32 are enough for the 8, frankly


    has to be a team with a lower pick and one that is more desperate.... maybe New England

  5. #5
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,403
    Post Thanks / Like
    It can't possibly be us. No way would the raiders take our ultra low 2nd this year plus a likely low 1st next year for the #8 pick...

  6. #6
    Waterboy
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    99
    Post Thanks / Like
    A team wants Clausen ahead of the Bills.
    How about the Redskins.
    They would get Clausen and the Offensive Tackle they need.

  7. #7
    All League
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,519
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by caster View Post
    A team wants Clausen ahead of the Bills.
    How about the Redskins.
    They would get Clausen and the Offensive Tackle they need.
    Al Davis hates Shannahan...would probably not do a trade with him even if it helped the Raiders.

  8. #8
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    21,180
    Post Thanks / Like
    That would be a sweet deal for the Jets depending on if they could do it on draft day. If one of a few players fell to that spot I'd make that trade for the Jets easily. I agree with people saying it is not enough though.

  9. #9
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    636
    Post Thanks / Like
    What if its the Skins because Shannahan covets Bradford?

    They could than package there two picks at 4 and 8 to move up to 1.

    Probably not enough for Al Davis to do it anyway.

  10. #10
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    18,349
    Post Thanks / Like
    I doubt our LATE 2nd, and what we would hope to be a LATE 2011 1st would be enough to get us up that high even if we wanted to. It would have to be a team willing to give up a Top 40 or so pick to replace the one they'll likely send to Philly for McNabb, IMO.

    Nevermind, outside of Eric Berry (Who will likely be gone even at 8), I don't see any obvious player for us to target there.....and it's not exactly easy to justify trading up that high to take a position that many people feel shouldn't go in the Top 10 anyways (I strongly disagree, but that's not the point here)....are we going to trade up for Dez Bryant? I have a hard time seeing that.

  11. #11
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,285
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Ven0m View Post
    I doubt our LATE 2nd, and what we would hope to be a LATE 2011 1st would be enough to get us up that high even if we wanted to. It would have to be a team willing to give up a Top 40 or so pick to replace the one they'll likely send to Philly for McNabb, IMO.

    Nevermind, outside of Eric Berry (Who will likely be gone even at 8), I don't see any obvious player for us to target there.....and it's not exactly easy to justify trading up that high to take a position that many people feel shouldn't go in the Top 10 anyways (I strongly disagree, but that's not the point here)....are we going to trade up for Dez Bryant? I have a hard time seeing that.
    Major man-crush on Eric Berry over here.

  12. #12
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    106
    Post Thanks / Like
    We don't need to trade up. We have Danny Woodhead!!!!

  13. #13
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    the 80s
    Posts
    8,088
    Post Thanks / Like
    its more likely a team without a 1st rnd pick. Tell me CAR isn't going to give up another future first round selection...

    CHI maybe.

  14. #14
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,655
    Post Thanks / Like
    only way jets would trade up is if berry is available. period. done. finito. end convo.

    therefore, for us to get involved, would have to be a draft day trade.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,211
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by aagarcia View Post
    http://theredzone.org/BlogDescriptio...d/Default.aspx

    Hmmm, think Tanny is up to his old tricks?
    Raiders are not trading out of ther first, for a second round pick in 2010 and a first round pick in 2011. That dosen't help them for 2010.

    Al Davis has NEVER traded back in the first round. Never.

  16. #16
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    5,664
    Post Thanks / Like
    clemens + gholston + our 1st round pick = trade up for Eric Berry

  17. #17
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    26,284
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JetsMakeMeCry View Post
    only way jets would trade up is if berry is available. period. done. finito. end convo.

    therefore, for us to get involved, would have to be a draft day trade.
    +1

  18. #18
    All League
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Forked River, NJ
    Posts
    4,709
    Post Thanks / Like
    There are 24 teams lower than #8. There is no reason to believe it's the Jets.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    9,157
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikey Z 6 View Post
    clemens + gholston + our 1st round pick = trade up for Eric Berry
    Clemens and Gholston? Wow that is one big package of crap. Maybe Crazy Al accepts.

  20. #20
    All League
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by newjakecity View Post
    I hope not. Pick 8 IMHO is no man's land (too much of a reach to grab players we could use, not soon enough to land one of the top players like Suh or McCoy).
    Yeah, no thanks. We'd be better off staying put.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us