I'm curious, becuase there seems to be a very common perception here at JI that Mark Sanchez is not only better than Chad Henne, but substantially better than Henne.
Sanchez: 15 games, 196 of 364 (53.8%) for 2444 Yards. 12 TD/20 INT
Primary Recievers: J. Cotchery, D. Keller, B. Edwards
Running Support: #1 Rushing Offense in NFL
Henne: 14 games, 274 of 451 (60.8%) for 2878 Yards. 12TD/14INT
Primary Recievers: D. Bess, G. Camarillo, T. Ginn Jr.
Running Support: 4th Rushing Offense in NFL
Head-to-Head: Henne 2-0 vs. Sanchez 0-2
So.....thats the numbers. So what are the reasons that J.I. seems so confident that Henne is a inferior player to Sanchez? What are the specifics that lead to this conclusion?
I ask, because I think Henne is pretty damn good too, and that both kids have a ton of potential, and better yet (IMO) the potential for a great-to-watch Marino-vs-OBrien type rivalry over the next few years.
But with that said, I don't see (thus far) the balance being in Sanchez favor just yet, certainly not by the wide margin I seem to see amongst our posters. Is it just the usual Sanchez-is-OUR-guy homerism, or are there specifics signs/events/stats that lead to this view that Sanchez is much better than Henne opinion?