Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: kellen clemens

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Dump, Staten Island
    Posts
    2,785

    kellen clemens

    Just Sayin.

  2. #2
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    SoFla
    Posts
    19,079
    Dump.

    Just sayin.

  3. #3
    All League
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Dump, Staten Island
    Posts
    2,785
    I think he would be an improvement over Sanchez at this point.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Sunny SoCal
    Posts
    400
    Who?

  5. #5
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    2,514
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetsrush View Post
    Just Sayin.

  6. #6
    Just Sayin' WHAT, exactly?

  7. #7
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,770
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetsrush View Post
    I think he would be an improvement over Sanchez at this point.
    I'm glad that you think that.

    Now kindly DUMP.

  8. #8
    Undrafted Free Agent
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Utica, NY
    Posts
    142

    Thumbs down

    Great, thats the last dumb idea i'll hear before bed tonight, thanks

  9. #9
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    15,229
    If Sanchez has to find the pine, then I think we need to go w/ Brunell. The experience will counteract any incompetence in play calling.
    Last edited by JumbalayaJet; 12-16-2010 at 02:16 AM.

  10. #10
    All League
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Simi Valley, CA
    Posts
    4,244
    The only way Clemens will see any playing time is if Sanchez were to get injured for an extended period of time. Even then, Brunell would likely be the starter.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetsrush View Post
    I think he would be an improvement over Sanchez at this point.
    lolz

  12. #12
    All League
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Simi Valley, CA
    Posts
    4,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetsrush View Post
    I think he would be an improvement over Sanchez at this point.
    Could possibly be true, but we'll never find out. Mark has shown enough flashes to show us it's possible for him to do the job adequately. Let's hope everything comes together for this offense very soon!!!

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by JumbalayaJet View Post
    If Sanchez has to find the pine, then I think we need to go w/ Brunell. The experience will counteract any incompetence in play calling.

    Yeah, but Brunell is almost like using Namath.

    They should suit Joe up just in case Brunell is a dud.

  14. #14
    All League
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    2,985
    Quote Originally Posted by Jetsrush View Post
    Just Sayin.
    Here's a tip...Dump.

  15. #15
    All League
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    2,985
    Quote Originally Posted by JumbalayaJet View Post
    If Sanchez has to find the pine, then I think we need to go w/ Brunell. The experience will counteract any incompetence in play calling.
    LOL @ you and OP x1000000000

  16. #16
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Upper East Side
    Posts
    6,853
    I'd rather start Schotty at QB than Kellen Clemens.

    Did you watch the Bucs game last year?

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Il Mostro View Post
    Who?
    LOL. You know, Clip Board Boy. The guy who cashed all those pay checks whilst having almost no NFL QB ability.

  18. #18
    If the offense goes another half without scoring a TD....you have to make a change. The season is depending on it.

    Honestly, the best possible option for instant offense would be to have BD Smith play QB. At least there's the potential for a big play.

    Brunell or Clemens aren't viable options at QB.

  19. #19
    For the record....

    No.

  20. #20
    KC vs MS:

    GS: 146 vs 431
    Comp Att: 282 vs 805
    Pct: 51.8 vs 53.5
    Yds: 1,680 vs 5,296
    Avg: 6.0 vs 6.6
    TD: 5 vs 28
    Int: 11 vs 32
    Sck: 35 vs 52
    Y: 186 vs 366
    Rate: 59.7 vs 69.1
    Att: 44 vs 63
    Yds: 119 vs 196
    Avg 2.7 vs 3.1
    TD: 1 vs 5
    FUM: 7 vs 19
    Lost: 2 vs 4

    ps, we're ****ed

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us