Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Adrian Clayborn

  1. #1
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,234
    Post Thanks / Like

    Adrian Clayborn

    If he is there, do we take him????

  2. #2
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,712
    Post Thanks / Like
    No thanks. Just not good enough. Not enough strength at the point, and not enough speed to make up for it. Not hard enough to block basically.

    I could see him being a decent player, but absolutely no elite upside.

  3. #3
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,056
    Post Thanks / Like
    He's more of a 4-3 end, in a typical year I would jump at him, but this year is an oddity, too many good DL's coming out. If he's there and Heyward is still available I'd take Heyward over him.

  4. #4
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    21,165
    Post Thanks / Like
    I think he is more of a 4-3 guy but just on falling and draft position I'd take him in a heartbeat at the 30th spot in the draft.

  5. #5
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    6,207
    Post Thanks / Like
    Would love to get him at #30. I think he's big enough and plays the run well enough to be a RDE in the 3-4. His effort is terrific, and he would bring good pass-rush production as well as run-stopping abilities.

  6. #6
    All League
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4,042
    Post Thanks / Like
    He's ok but I prefer Heyward at 30

  7. #7
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    19,076
    Post Thanks / Like
    I think the Jets have to consider him at #30, but I really hope he's gone and pushes down Wilk, Hey or Ayers.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us