Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: Mario Williams moved to linebacker?

  1. #1
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like

    Mario Williams moved to linebacker?

    Does anyone else know this? I just heard it on ESPN. Why on earth would they make that move?

  2. #2
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,263
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=TurkJetFan;4103718]Does anyone else know this? I just heard it on ESPN. Why on earth would they make that move?[/QUOTE]

    Yes. They switched to a 3-4 under Wade Phillips.

  3. #3
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=escamoter2;4103722]Yes. Old news. They switched to a 3-4 under Wade Phillips.[/QUOTE]

    I knew they switched to the 3-4 but didn't know they moved Mario. Yeah that does make sense, but really interesting to me.

    Frankly, rather then moving Mario and risking him losing value, I'd of traded him for a 3-4 backer and filled other needs. He would of demanded a lot and definitely would of garnered serious interest.

  4. #4
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    38,782
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=TurkJetFan;4103718] Why on earth would they make that move?[/QUOTE]

    because you want your best player rushing the passer, not gap clogging (and theres no one you can trade Mario Williams for that is worth the trade)

  5. #5
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    878
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=escamoter2;4103722]Yes. They switched to a 3-4 under Wade Phillips.[/QUOTE]

    he's a great athlete but I would test his coverage skills immediately!

  6. #6
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=bitonti;4103727]because you want your best player rushing the passer, not gap clogging[/QUOTE]

    of course, but switching a players position is a big risk. and with the type of investment they have him in it's a real risky move. seems to me to have been a great opportunity for a trade to fill needs with quality players.

  7. #7
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,263
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=TurkJetFan;4103726]I knew they switched to the 3-4 but didn't know they moved Mario. Yeah that does make sense, but really interesting to me.

    Frankly, rather then moving Mario and risking him losing value, I'd of traded him for a 3-4 backer and filled other needs. He would of demanded a lot and definitely would of garnered serious interest.[/QUOTE]

    DeMarcus Ware played OLB not DE for the Cowboys under Wade and he looked like a beast. Mario should be fine.

  8. #8
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=escamoter2;4103732]DeMarcus Ware played OLB not DE for the Cowboys under Wade and he looked like a beast. Mario should be fine.[/QUOTE]

    absolutely, but every player is different. IMO switching a players position fails more often then it succeeds especially in the front 7.

  9. #9
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    5,263
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=TurkJetFan;4103734]absolutely, but every player is different. IMO switching a players position fails more often then it succeeds especially in the front 7.[/QUOTE]

    While I understand your point, you can't make him a 3-4 end. He won't be able to rush the passer. No choice but to make him an OLB.

  10. #10
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=escamoter2;4103739]While I understand your point, you can't make him a 3-4 end. He won't be able to rush the passer. No choice but to make him an OLB.[/QUOTE]

    absolutely agree he can't be a 3-4 end. I guess my standpoint is, trade him while his value is significant and get key players in return that fit the system.

  11. #11
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    9,759
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=jetlifer;4103728]he's a great athlete but I would test his coverage skills immediately![/QUOTE]

    +1

  12. #12
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6,374
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=escamoter2;4103732]DeMarcus Ware played OLB not DE for the Cowboys under Wade and he looked like a beast. Mario should be fine.[/QUOTE]

    Ware is a complete linebacker. Everyone knows he can rush the passer, but he's also great against the run and a good cover man on the few occasions they ask him to do that.

    Mario Williams has never covered anyone in his entire life. They're going to have to rush him 90% of the time, taking away from the flexibility and unpredictability that usually comes from a 3-4 set.

  13. #13
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JB1089;4103761]Ware is a complete linebacker. Everyone knows he can rush the passer, but he's also great against the run and a good cover man on the few occasions they ask him to do that.

    Mario Williams has never covered anyone in his entire life. They're going to have to rush him 90% of the time, taking away from the flexibility and unpredictability that usually comes from a 3-4 set.[/QUOTE]

    +1

    i really think the texans should of traded him while is value is still sky high.

  14. #14
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    6,374
    Post Thanks / Like
    And why couldn't he be a 3-4 end? He's 6'6" 290, or at least he was (I assume he dropped a few pounds for the conversion). Ngata and Seymour are 3-4 ends, you're telling me that they aren't valuable?

    I remember hearing about this when they hired Phillips. I thought it was dumb and that there was no way they would actually go through with it.

  15. #15
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    38,782
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=TurkJetFan;4103765]+1

    i really think the texans should of traded him while is value is still sky high.[/QUOTE]

    there's no realistic trade scenario where the Texans deal Mario Williams and get fair value in return. Who is as impactful as Williams? and why would any team trade this player?

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,817
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JB1089;4103761]Ware is a complete linebacker. Everyone knows he can rush the passer, but he's also great against the run and a good cover man on the few occasions they ask him to do that.

    Mario Williams has never covered anyone in his entire life. They're going to have to rush him 90% of the time, taking away from the flexibility and unpredictability that usually comes from a 3-4 set.[/QUOTE]

    Lawrence Taylor was technically an OLB for the Giants. The opposing offense knew he was rushing the passer every down, it didn't matter because he was a beast. I don't think it will be much of a problem with Williams rushing the passer most of the time.

    Wade Phillips is a hell of a DC, I think he'll figure out the best way to use him.

  17. #17
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=bitonti;4103772]there's no realistic trade scenario where the Texans deal Mario Williams and get fair value in return. Who is as impactful as Williams? and why would any team trade this player?[/QUOTE]

    play out the big picture...moving mario williams who is a pure rusher into a new position w/ the $$ invested in him is a tremendous risk.

    he has incredible value right now and would demand a high quality 3-4 OLB plus a first IMO.

  18. #18
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    5,375
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=TurkJetFan;4103726]I knew they switched to the 3-4 but didn't know they moved Mario. Yeah that does make sense, but really interesting to me.

    Frankly, rather then moving Mario and risking him losing value, I'd of traded him for a 3-4 backer and filled other needs. He would of demanded a lot and definitely would of garnered serious interest.[/QUOTE]

    But how would any such trade work? The interest would mainly come from 4-3 teams - and they wouldn't have any 3-4 LBs to trade.

    If you trade him to a team that plays 3-4, they would then need to convert him to LB, so you might as well do it yourself.

  19. #19
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,712
    Post Thanks / Like
    You guys overrate the difference between 3-4 OLB and 4-3 DE SOOOOO much it's sickening...

    He's still going to be rushing the passer from the edge and that's the most important thing. On clear passing downs, he'll have his hand on the ground like he has his entire career. Why you would even worry about coverage when he's going to do that maybe 10% of the time is beyond me.

  20. #20
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    6,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    [QUOTE=JamesR;4103784]But how would any such trade work? The interest would mainly come from 4-3 teams - and they wouldn't have any 3-4 LBs to trade.

    If you trade him to a team that plays 3-4, they would then need to convert him to LB, so you might as well do it yourself.[/QUOTE]

    how so? and there are plenty of current 4-3 backers that can be converted to 3-4 backers quite easily. it's not always black and white.

    and in that case you let someone else take that $50+ million dollar risk and get more a sure thing plus a high draft pick.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us