[QUOTE=Sexi Rexi;4215657]While I love Joe (UDel alum!) who's calling him elite? He's an average nfl qb. Mark most of the time is an average qb, who tends to play really well when all of the pressure is on.[/QUOTE]
Clayton calls him elite. Never hear him ripped like Sanchez is. Must be a NY thing.
Flacco's good, I think he has the potential to be really good, but I don't think anyone can really call him "elite" at this point. People love to throw terminology around but "elite" should be saved for the, well, elites like Manning, Brady, Rodgers and Brees.
Last edited by Green&White51; 11-03-2011 at 01:17 AM.
[QUOTE=Green&White51;4215735]Flacco's good, I think he has the potential to be really good, but I don't think anyone can really call him "elite" at this point. People love to throw terminology around but "elite" should be saved for the, well, elites like Manning, Brady, Rodgers and Brees.[/QUOTE]
I believe you're throwing the term around too. If you take away the current season Rodgers is NOT an ELITE QB. Obviously he won the superbowl and he's tearing it up right now, but there were a few games last year where he really didn't produce. Not to mention he has experienced and very skilled wr's. If he keeps running house like what he's doing now for the rest of the year I think you can start calling him elite. As for now I don't think he deserves to be considered on the same level as Brady and Peyton or Brees.
Phil Simms also has a lot of praise and respect for Sanchez. Not exactly the analyst to quote for the "honest" opinion of one particular player.
In the end, Sanchez > Flacco
It's really not that much of a debate. Flacco sucks in the playoffs and really is just not much of an impressive QB. Not saying Sanchez is impressive, but he's shown flashes and for 2 consecutive years has stepped up his game during the playoffs.
flacco is very limited as a qb. he needs a good team around him to make plays. i don't see the same with sanchez. sanchez has way more mobility and good enough accuracy and arm strength to be a really good qb.
I don't like comparing Sanchez to contemporaries. I prefer to compare him to older QB's
at the same point of their career. Curiously, Sanchez is very comparable stat-wise to Tom Brady.
Here are their stats after their first 38 games.
It should be noted that Brady had 1 year in the NFL under his belt before becoming the starting
QB and Sanchez started his first game as a rookie. So, one would expect Brady's stats to be better
after his first 38 games.
Some judge QB's by wins. So, here is their records through 38 regular season games.
None of this included playoff stats or records. Here is their playoff records
and stats through the same point of their careers.
People can obviously draw thier own conclusions. My conclusion is that Sanchez is doing
just fine, has proven to be at his best in crunch time, and has a very high ceiling. I don't know
that he'll ever be as good as Brady is right now, but their is really nothing you can point to and
say Sanchez has no chance of ever being as good as Brady.
Flacco is worse than Sanchez its plain as day...Flacco's ceiling is much, much lower. His Pocket presence isn't close nor is his escapability and mobility. Flacco's arm may be a little stronger but Sanchez has a good enough arm to make any nfl throw. Both are tough. Both struggle with their accuracy from time to time but when the the chips are down im taking sanchez to win a game for me over Flaccostein