Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 46

Thread: Feds suspend immigration enforcement program

  1. #1

    Feds suspend immigration enforcement program

    [QUOTE]Feds suspend immigration enforcement program after Arizona court ruling

    In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision on Arizona's immigration law, Obama administration officials announced Monday they are suspending a key program that allowed state and local law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law.

    The move further weakens efforts by Arizona and other states to take the reins on immigration enforcement.

    The high court decision Monday struck down three provisions in Arizona's law but left in place a central plank that required local law enforcement during routine stops to check the immigration status of anyone they suspect is in the country illegally.

    Obama administration officials and congressional Democrats immediately raised concerns this could lead to "racial profiling," though Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer adamantly denies it. To address those concerns, Obama administration officials moved Monday to pull back on enforcement cooperation with local jurisdictions -- meaning that even if local police step up immigration checks, they'll have to rely on federal officials to make the arrests.

    Federal officials said the program known as 287(g) would be immediately suspended. That program was a partnership between federal and local governments, and allowed local authorities to make immigration-based arrests.

    Officials also said Immigration and Customs Enforcement will be selective in responding to the expected increase in calls from Arizona and other police agencies about immigration status of people they pull over. Officials said ICE will not respond to the scene unless the person in question meets certain criteria -- such as being wanted for a felony.


    Read more: [url]http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/25/feds-suspend-immigration-enforcement-program-after-arizona-court-ruling/#ixzz1ypbTOi3p[/url][/QUOTE]

    And the beat rolls on.

  2. #2
    Answers my question in the other thread as well as drives home the point I tried to make that local enforcement was the core issue in the bill...

  3. #3
    That . . . may be the single stupidest political move that an American administration has ever made.

  4. #4
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    5,572
    WTF... What is Obama doing?

  5. #5
    [QUOTE=Bonhomme Richard;4500215]WTF... What is Obama doing?[/QUOTE]

    Pandering...

  6. #6
    [QUOTE=AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite;4500225]Panicking...[/QUOTE]

    FTFY

  7. #7
    You can't do the job of the Feds without them, with or without the law.

  8. #8
    It's unbelievable the animosity Obama demonstrates.

    All the hope and dreams of a new fair leader has turned into one of the worst politicians and biggest disappointment ever.

  9. #9
    It's over. Can we swear Romney in a few months early?

  10. #10
    [QUOTE=cr726;4500258]You can't do the job of the Feds without them, with or without the law.[/QUOTE]

    Obumbles took an oath to enforce the laws of this nation and uphold it's Constitution. He refuses to do that. He needs to be removed from office....

  11. #11
    [QUOTE=DeanPatsFan;4500276]Obumbles took an oath to enforce the laws of this nation and uphold it's Constitution. He refuses to do that. He needs to be removed from office....[/QUOTE]

    That's not the argument here.

  12. #12
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,976
    Judge Roberts may end up being the most liberal justice after all...




    ARG!! EVERYTHING IS OBAMA'S FAULT!!

  13. #13
    [QUOTE=PlumberKhan;4500294]Judge Roberts may end up being the most liberal justice after all...




    ARG!! EVERYTHING IS OBAMA'S FAULT!![/QUOTE]

    LOL

  14. #14
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,976
    [QUOTE=Jetdawgg;4500298]LOL[/QUOTE]

    It wouldn't be so funny if it wasn't so sad.



    Psst. Hey border states. Wanna stop illegal immigration? Stop hiring them, you inbred morons.

    <plucks suspenders> "Texas is awesome!! We could secede and survive on our own!"

    "well, yeah. Of course you could. Because you guys sub out 1/2 of your work to illegal immigrants."

  15. #15
    [QUOTE=doggin94it;4500245]FTFY[/QUOTE]

    lol

  16. #16
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Un-Pleasantville
    Posts
    6,528
    The libs/B. Hussein are going all in on their demented ideology for spite.

    There's still 6 1/2 months left for them to do more damage - as a great entertainer once said, "You ain't seen nothin' yet!"

    Any public sector official employee or LEO who supports this nonsense not only should be fired they should be strung up in the public square like Mussolini, then dragged through the street, with their dirty, grimy offal shoveled into massive Orwellian meat grinders where they are converted into flex fuel and/or capriciously thrown to feral cats and circus animals for between-meal snacks.

    Well maybe that's a bit harsh.

    I'll settle for 0 getting cashiered in Nov. as a start.

  17. #17
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,976
    [QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;4500398]The libs/B. Hussein are going all in on their demented ideology for spite. .[/QUOTE]

    Yes. Judge Roberts. Liberal.

    :dunce:


    Sent from my Double-Wide using Semaphore...

  18. #18
    [QUOTE=PlumberKhan;4500410]Yes. Judge Roberts. Liberal.

    :dunce:


    Sent from my Double-Wide using Semaphore...[/QUOTE]

    FYI no one knows what you are talking about. What does Judge Roberts have to do with this post?

  19. #19
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Un-Pleasantville
    Posts
    6,528
    [QUOTE=PlumberKhan;4500410]Yes. Judge Roberts. Liberal.

    :dunce:


    Sent from my Double-Wide using Semaphore...[/QUOTE]

    Rainblow, do you[U] really[/U] think Judge Roberts is liberal?
    In this particular case sure he might be liberal regarding most parts of the AZ law.
    Except the crucial part that B. Hussein and Withholder were against!

    Don't cry you got the cr's of the world who won't enforce the law and the dogsh!ts who will get 'em off the hook if they ever do.

    The spigot on the pipeline of fresh street meat (the only one libs approve of) won't be shut off just yet either.

  20. #20
    [QUOTE=Jungle Shift Jet;4500452]Rainblow, do you[U] really[/U] think Judge Roberts is liberal?
    In this particular case sure he might be liberal regarding most parts of the AZ law.
    Except the crucial part that B. Hussein and Withholder were against!

    Don't cry you got the cr's of the world who won't enforce the law and the dogsh!ts who will get 'em off the hook if they ever do.

    The spigot on the pipeline of fresh street meat (the only one libs approve of) won't be shut off just yet either.[/QUOTE]

    The whole article was about how the SC upheld the crucial part of the AZ law. Then since the FED's lost they decided simply not to cooperate. Has nothing to do with Roberts.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us