Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 48

Thread: Former Jets scout Connie Carberg delivers insight on WR Stephen Hill

  1. #21
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,445
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JStokes View Post
    Haven't been on the Pfail Strip lately, but wow, who let the self-important windbag back in?

    _
    I did, sir.

    He's my cousin.


  2. #22
    All League
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    4,902
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PlumberKhan View Post
    I did, sir.

    He's my cousin.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNJj-PA8lKU

  3. #23
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    7,193
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PatsFanTX View Post
    Would you take:

    Year 1: 38 receptions, 560 yards, 3 TD's

    Year 2: 70 receptions, 990 yards, 7 TD's

    No question.

  4. #24
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    19,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by WestCoastOffensive View Post


    /thread
    Um. Why don't you then?

  5. #25
    Bewildered Beast
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    SF via Strong Island
    Posts
    30,072
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DDNYjets View Post
    Um. Why don't you then?
    Well, the public is not being harmed; if DWC was speaking in somewhere, we could get a warrant to stop him before he used up all the O2. But, it's just letters in cyberspace, so...












  6. #26
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    16,710
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PlumberKhan View Post
    I did, sir.

    He's my cousin.



  7. #27
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,538
    Post Thanks / Like
    only if holmes is north of 10 td's and over 1000 yds with keller around 60 catches and 7 or 8 td's. it's a team game and what hill does will impact what the others do and vice versa.


    Quote Originally Posted by PatsFanTX View Post
    Would you take:

    Year 1: 38 receptions, 560 yards, 3 TD's

    Year 2: 70 receptions, 990 yards, 7 TD's

  8. #28
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Electric Avenue
    Posts
    25,751
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JStokes View Post
    Haven't been on the Pfail Strip lately, but wow, who let the self-important windbag back in?

    _
    It's been worse than you can imagine.

  9. #29
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Electric Avenue
    Posts
    25,751
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PatsFanTX View Post
    Would you take:

    Year 1: 38 receptions, 560 yards, 3 TD's

    Year 2: 70 receptions, 990 yards, 7 TD's
    I suppose that would be okay as long as Holmes is getting his in year 1.

    You just couldn't give him 1,000 yards, could you?

  10. #30
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Electric Avenue
    Posts
    25,751
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by WestCoastOffensive View Post
    Well, the public is not being harmed; if DWC was speaking in somewhere, we could get a warrant to stop him before he used up all the O2. But, it's just letters in cyberspace, so...











    Let's start a petition.

  11. #31
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    9,452
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JStokes View Post
    Haven't been on the Pfail Strip lately, but wow, who let the self-important windbag back in?

    _
    That could apply to several posters in this thread. you need to be more specific.

  12. #32
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Electric Avenue
    Posts
    25,751
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Dcat View Post
    That could apply to several posters in this thread. you need to be more specific.
    You know exactly who he was referring to.

  13. #33
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    9,452
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PatsFanTX View Post
    And that's the point I would make as well.

    If Hill can get on the field and deliver those numbers Year 1, follow up Year 2 with that kind of production improvement, he would be very wel lpositioned for a break out Year 3.

    If that happens, Jets FO would automatically give him a contract extension thus, locking up a probable top 10 NFL WR for the foreseeable future.

    But then again, Chad Jackson says hi as well (just keeping things in perspective).
    What was the injury that ruined Chad Jackson's development?

  14. #34
    All League
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Posts
    4,883
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Dcat View Post
    What was the injury that ruined Chad Jackson's development?
    ================================================== =

    No injury that I recall, twas more that he couldn't raise his game to the NFL level.

  15. #35
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,777
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PatsFanTX View Post
    Whatever the number of receptions, I think Hill will have a YPC in the vicinity of 15 per catch.

    He will not be catching the quick slants and 3-yard outs. His receptions will be downfield.
    Hill & Schilens are xactly w/jets need on offense to compliment Kurl & Tone.. U see me???

  16. #36
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    19,524
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by WestCoastOffensive View Post
    Well, the public is not being harmed; if DWC was speaking in somewhere, we could get a warrant to stop him before he used up all the O2. But, it's just letters in cyberspace, so...




    Bandwidth = O2.


  17. #37
    All League
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4,042
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by NY2FLDWC85 View Post
    Hell yes. Could you imagine his 3rd season as more of a polished outside receiver?

    I think he'll put up more than 3 TD's his rookie season though, due to his overall size and leaping/jumping ability. About the same size as Plaxico with much better jumping ability (when compred to Plax coming out of college). Has all the making for a monster red zone target.
    He's much faster than Plax coming out of college, and has warp speed differential right now. I think BE is a better comparison/target to emulate than Plax, who was pretty much useless between the 20's

  18. #38
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    6,184
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PatsFanTX View Post
    And that's the point I would make as well.

    If Hill can get on the field and deliver those numbers Year 1, follow up Year 2 with that kind of production improvement, he would be very wel lpositioned for a break out Year 3.

    If that happens, Jets FO would automatically give him a contract extension thus, locking up a probable top 10 NFL WR for the foreseeable future.

    But then again, Chad Jackson says hi as well (just keeping things in perspective).

    I agree with your assessment, I think the Jets using him as a #2 is a mistake in his rookie year. They should bring in a hold the fort type #2 receiver for 2012 and blend in Hill, just my opinion.

  19. #39
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Electric Avenue
    Posts
    25,751
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Boynton Beach Jets View Post
    I agree with your assessment, I think the Jets using him as a #2 is a mistake in his rookie year. They should bring in a hold the fort type #2 receiver for 2012 and blend in Hill, just my opinion.
    I agree as well.

    I still think a healthy Edwards is the perfect guy but...

  20. #40
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    6,184
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    I agree as well.

    I still think a healthy Edwards is the perfect guy but...

    I don't know if Edwards is the answer his route running is not always the best. He often runs the wrong route causing turnovers. There is a reason why a WR starved team like SF cut him.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us