I did read the article, and it was very interesting. Other than the fact that it creates more terrorists than it kills, I have no issue with drone strikes. In fact, I think Pakistan and Yemen would make terrific uninhabited parking lots.
In any case, how is the leaker patriotic exactly?
I'm surprised a bit.
I'm not quite sure what Obama is doing is legal/constitutional, even if it is effective - that's why it's patriotic in leaking it.
Is that not one of the most informative pieces of journalism done in the past decade? After reading that, one sees rather clearly what the War on Terror is, and how we are waging it.
And since they're drones, we're not risking Americans, nor anything strategic. Nothing in that article could be used by Al Qaeda.
Do you think someone from the President's inner circle has leaked information that negatively impacts our national security/foreign policy......
When was the last administration who DIDN'T leak information
Do you remember Valerie Plame?
Originally Posted by AlwaysGreenAlwaysWhite
Why did you bold the portion of the article that has absolutely nothing to do with the title of the OP, as the NYT main point here seems to be saying that Romney is calling Obama treasonous, which if he assisted in leaking the information, I completely agree with...
Cause it is funny
Romney shaking his fist at Iran have them terrified