Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: Dems have hard time adding God to platform with multiple votes

  1. #41
    All League
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,850
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kennyo7 View Post
    Yes drugs should be legalized and BC should be covered by a national health care system. So what. I didnt realize you were against condoms. I guess you are one of the dingbats who still preach abstinence.

    Ah, a physician who wants legal drugs. Plenty of coke, heroin and
    whatnot to help you stay employed treating people. And are YOU yourself a heavy user? Hmmm. Health conscious are we? A doctor whacked on drugs. No wonder the VA stinks. I can imagine the amount of oxy ordered at YOUR facility.
    I have no problem with people using condoms or any sort of BC. Want it? Pay for it yourself. Tha's not a dingbat, that's resposible. That's a word foreign to you perhaps. People on the dole usually don't get the concept.

  2. #42
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    939
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PlumberKhan View Post
    Further proof that all "God" does is cause f*cking problems.
    This is offensive, you have issues.

  3. #43
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    939
    Post Thanks / Like
    This just shows that the delegates at the DNC are on the fringe of the political spectrum. The DNC has been taken over by extremists who say no to God.

  4. #44
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,646
    Post Thanks / Like
    The guy must be on drugs if he thinks the VA is some wonderful medical system:

    Walter Reed Army Medical Center neglect scandal
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    The Walter Reed Army Medical Center neglect scandal resulted from a series of allegations of unsatisfactory conditions, treatment of patients, and management at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) in Washington, D.C. culminating in two articles published by The Washington Post in February 2007. Several cases of patient neglect and shoddy living conditions were reported as early as 2004. Significant public and media attention was generated, which in turn prompted a number of congressional and executive actions, including resignations of several high-ranking officers

    The Washington Post published a series of articles beginning February 18, 2007, outlining cases of neglect at Walter Reed reported by wounded soldiers and their family members.[1] Although the article focused primarily on Building 18, a former hotel building just outside the post's main gates, authors Dana Priest and Anne Hull also included complaints about "disengaged clerks, unqualified platoon sergeants and overworked managers" that make navigating the already complicated bureaucracy to obtain medical care at WRAMC even more daunting. Although Army officials claimed to be surprised at these conditions, a Salon.com series beginning in January 2005 had previously exposed them.[2] In 2004 and 2005, articles appeared in the Post and in Salon interviewing First Lt. Julian Goodrum about his court martial for seeking medical care elsewhere due to poor conditions at WRAMC.[3][4]
    [edit]Building 18

    This section needs additional citations for verification. (March 2012)
    WRAMC's Building 18 is described in Washington Post article as rat and cockroach infested, with stained carpets, cheap mattresses, and black mold, with no heat and water reported by some soldiers at the facility. The unmonitored entrance created security problems, including reports of drug dealers in front of the facility. Injured soldiers stated they are forced to "pull guard duty" to obtain a level of security. In an attempt to alleviate the toll that Building 18's condition is taking on the wounded soldiers, a staff team headed by a clinical social worker at WRAMC obtained a grant of $30,000 from the Commander's Initiative Account for improvements; however, "a Psychiatry Department functionary held up the rest of the money because she feared that buying a lot of recreational equipment close to Christmas would trigger an audit." By January the funds were no longer available.[1]
    The problems associated with Building 18 were not new to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center community. As early as 1999 the extensive problems with Building 18 were identified to senior level leadership, and funding for renovations and improvements were denied. Prior to its role housing wounded warriors, Building 18 had long served as the barracks of WRAMC Student Company. Between 1999 and 2001, under the Command of then Captain Michael D. Dake, the Student Company leadership identified the deplorable conditions in and around Building 18 to two Medical Center Brigade Commanders (COL Terry D. Carroll, and COL Larry S. Bolton respectively). By 2002, the requests for funding to improve conditions in and around Building 18 had made it to the attention of Major General Kevin C. Kiley. Kiley, who toured the facility as part of his Commander's in-brief after arriving in June, personally inspected the facility and spoke to the Soldiers and the Leadership. He then also denied funding for improvements. By 2004, renovation of Building 18 had been anticipated in connection with the enhanced use lease of Building 40, but since the post was slated for closure under BRAC in 2005, the anticipated in-kind services by the Building 40 developer did not materialize.
    Although the Post's authors are quick to point out that "not all the quarters are as bleak as" Building 18, "the despair of Building 18 symbolizes a larger problem in Walter Reed's treatment of the wounded. The typical soldier is required to file 22 documents with eight different commands most of them off-post to enter and exit the medical processing world, according to government investigators. Sixteen different information systems are used to process the forms, but few of them can communicate with one another. The Army's three personnel databases cannot read each other's files and can't interact with the separate pay system or the medical recordkeeping databases."[5] This complicated system has required some soldiers to prove they were in the Iraq War or the War in Afghanistan in order to obtain medical treatment and benefits because Walter Reed employees are unable to locate their records.
    [edit]Consequences



    Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman, commander of Walter Reed, relieved of duty March 1.
    Less than a week after the article, new Defense Secretary Robert Gates visited Walter Reed and said those responsible would be "held accountable":
    "I endorse the decision by Secretary of the Army Fran Harvey to relieve the Commander, Major General George W. Weightman of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. The care and welfare of our wounded men and women in uniform demand the highest standard of excellence and commitment that we can muster as a government. When this standard is not met, I will insist on swift and direct corrective action and, where appropriate, accountability up the chain of command."[6]


    Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the Army, resigned March 2.
    The Army announced it had relieved of command Maj. Gen. Weightman, a physician who had headed the hospital for only six months. In a brief announcement, the Army said service leaders had "lost trust and confidence" in Weightman's leadership abilities "to address needed solutions for soldier outpatient care." It said the decision to fire him was made by Secretary of the Army Francis J. Harvey.[7]


    Lt. Gen. Kevin C. Kiley, Army Surgeon General and ex-commander of Walter Reed, submitted retirement on March 12.
    Harvey then named Army Surgeon General and former Walter Reed commander Kevin Kiley as interim commander, but Harvey himself was forced to resign by Gates on March 2. Gates felt Harvey wasn't getting the Army to move fast enough on making necessary changes. Maj. Gen. Eric Schoomaker was named the new commander of Walter Reed on March 2. Kiley himself retired on March 12, 2007 after acting Army Secretary Pete Geren asked for Kiley's resignation.[8]
    An internal WRAMC memorandum from September 2006 warned that the personnel shortage caused by an outsourcing of public works servicehttp://www.reliabilityweb.com/art08/walter_reed.htms put WRAMC in danger of "mission failure".[9]
    University of Miami President and former Clinton cabinet Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, along with former Republican Senator Bob Dole, were appointed by President George W. Bush to lead the President's Commission on Care for America's Returning Wounded Warriors,[10] an investigative panel regarding the various allegations.[11] The remaining Commission members included two veterans wounded in Operation Iraqi Freedom, the wife of an Army Staff Sergeant severely burned in Iraq, the Chairman and CEO of a non-for-profit organization that constructs "comfort homes" for families of hospitalized military servicemembers, two leaders in the health care industry, and an expert on veterans affairs and military health care.[12] This commission released their final report on July 26, 2007 [13] and issued their findings in testimony to the U.S. Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs on September 26, 2007.[14]
    The scandal at Walter Reed led to an extensive analysis of the veteran's healthcare system, as well, managed by the United States Department of Veterans' Affairs. Amidst accusations of mismanagement and excessive bureaucracy,[15][16] the VA announced an extensive review of all of their medical facilities to ensure healthcare standards are being met.[17]

  5. #45
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,433
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernie View Post
    This is offensive, you have issues.
    It would only be offensive if God were real, Brother Ernie. And trust me...what I say/do is WAY less "offensive" than saying stuff like "God Bless America" or putting "In God We Trust" on money.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us