Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: this team should have went to a 4-3 defense.

  1. #1

    this team should have went to a 4-3 defense.

    but rex being the stubborn man that he is stuck with the 3-4 which has failed us miserably.

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Jerseystrong
    Posts
    18,676
    Cool

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    52,055
    Quote Originally Posted by Nike View Post
    but rex being the stubborn man that he is stuck with the 3-4 which has failed us miserably.
    Yea, Ole Bart Scott would fare really well as an OLB in a 4-3 defense.

  4. #4
    Nice thread.

  5. #5
    All League
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,623
    should have gone.

    proper english.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    13,518
    You should have went to remedial English.....

  7. #7
    I think he would've been better off speaking Spanish...



    Seriously, though, it doesn't matter what type of Defense the Jets "should" have went to.....


    With the Slow-as-molasses LB's we have, It won't matter if it's 3-4, 4-3, or 69(heh).....THE JETS LB CORPS SUCKS!

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Braumeister View Post
    You should have went to remedial English.....
    LOL. Mods, no disrespect to the OP, but would you please correct the thread title. Just going past it on the board makes me cringe.

  9. #9
    The op is totally correct, regardless of how it was posted.

    We have potential play makers in Wilkerson and Coples that are either not on the field or stuck as DE's in a 3-4 which limits what you can do in the scheme. We have horrific 3-4 OLB's that can't rush the passer or cover. I know we are a 'hybrid' defense but there just seems to be way more Dlineman that can fit a 4-3 than a 3-4 and if you have trash olb's in a 3-4 you are dead meat.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Vin View Post
    I think he would've been better off speaking Spanish...



    Seriously, though, it doesn't matter what type of Defense the Jets "should" have went to.....


    With the Slow-as-molasses LB's we have, It won't matter if it's 3-4, 4-3, or 69(heh).....THE JETS LB CORPS SUCKS!
    Este equipo deberķa haber ido a una defensa 4-3.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Beerfish View Post
    The op is totally correct, regardless of how it was posted.

    We have potential play makers in Wilkerson and Coples that are either not on the field or stuck as DE's in a 3-4 which limits what you can do in the scheme. We have horrific 3-4 OLB's that can't rush the passer or cover. I know we are a 'hybrid' defense but there just seems to be way more Dlineman that can fit a 4-3 than a 3-4 and if you have trash olb's in a 3-4 you are dead meat.
    this guy gets it.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Nike View Post
    but rex being the stubborn man that he is stuck with the 3-4 which has failed us miserably.
    Yeah, because we're LOADED with edge rushers

  13. #13
    probably. cant be a 3-4 team with no LBs. and no need to draft any either the last couple years

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Nike View Post
    Este equipo deberķa haber ido a una defensa 4-3.
    NOW you're sounding professional.




Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us