Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 81

Thread: Can the Jets afford Welker ?

  1. #41
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    22,808
    Post Thanks / Like
    Another thread derailed by the same posters...every time! If I was a mod.....

  2. #42
    All League
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Boston area
    Posts
    4,471
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray Ray19 View Post
    Hey TROLL STFU, you don't get to criticize anybody around here.

    Perhaps you should make a post declaring that all posters need your authorization to point out that you're acting like an insufferable asshat.

  3. #43
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Big Apple, USA
    Posts
    22,030
    Post Thanks / Like
    Darn you ray....your stick has stirred up three hideous rabid frothing chowd troll ferrets with one swipe

    Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

  4. #44
    All League
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Midland Park, NJ
    Posts
    3,703
    Post Thanks / Like
    This thread is gold.

    Rah Rah, never leave

  5. #45
    All League
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    2,836
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by McGinley View Post
    No thanks. Brady isn't gonna be throwing him the ball here, so I'm not entirely sure he would be that great for us. Not to mention, we already have receivers that are 4'9. What we need to do is get Hill reps and develop him. A tall, young, fast Hill with better hands and experience is much more important to us than an older Welker.
    I got it!

    Revis and our entire 2013 draft for Brady.

  6. #46
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    8,378
    Post Thanks / Like
    No.

    And even if they could, Jeremy Kerley is our slot receiver. He's young and emerging, let him develop.

  7. #47
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Posts
    1,336
    Post Thanks / Like
    Nope, that's why the Pats continue to be successful, they allow players to leave as they get older and have no emotional attachments.
    Last edited by CGJET; 12-16-2012 at 12:37 PM.

  8. #48
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    13,228
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by rmeyer52 View Post
    Welker is a FA next year and from what I have read the relationship between him and the Pats front office is not too good. He is not the fastest receiver but he always seems to find a way to get open. Should the Jets go after him ?
    Ugh? When you have a QB that sucks and is totally inaccurate????

    NO. What would be the point? That's like putting a silk hat on a pig.

    Besides, when the Jets jettison Sanchez and put a real QB on the team, he'll have Braylon Edwards and Santonio Holmes and Jeremy Kerley.

    Bray and Holmes did pretty well for the team in 2010. Lets see what they can do for us in 2013.

  9. #49
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Mendham, NJ
    Posts
    12,640
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by C Mart View Post
    Another thread derailed by the same posters...every time! If I was a mod.....
    Would be an excellent move IMO.

  10. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    3,016
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Mainejet View Post
    Ugh? When you have a QB that sucks and is totally inaccurate????

    NO. What would be the point? That's like putting a silk hat on a pig.

    Besides, when the Jets jettison Sanchez and put a real QB on the team, he'll have Braylon Edwards and Santonio Holmes and Jeremy Kerley.

    Bray and Holmes did pretty well for the team in 2010. Lets see what they can do for us in 2013.
    I think you still have Sanchez as the guy slinging the rock in 2013. Will Bray, Holmes, and Kerley still be on the '14 squad?

  11. #51
    All League
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,247
    Post Thanks / Like
    zero interest in Welker. Welker is great for a guy like Brady, but i rather spend my money on a number 1 WR and not a slot WR that is going to command much more money than Kerley (IMO), is much older than Kerley and isn't really that much better than Kerley.

    Who knows how effective he will be without Brady and that system.

    Pass

  12. #52
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    9,475
    Post Thanks / Like
    Can we afford to have another WR on our team that has a case of the dropsies? No. Absolutely not. We can not afford Welker.

  13. #53
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Big Apple, USA
    Posts
    22,030
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by southside View Post
    Can we afford to have another WR on our team that has a case of the dropsies? No. Absolutely not. We can not afford Welker.
    +1



    thought I would try and get a post in before Guido and the rest of the stinking chowd trolls derail and destroy another thread

  14. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    52,055
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by revischrist View Post
    zero interest in Welker. Welker is great for a guy like Brady, but i rather spend my money on a number 1 WR and not a slot WR that is going to command much more money than Kerley (IMO), is much older than Kerley and isn't really that much better than Kerley.
    Delusional Jets fan.

    When was the last time Kerley had 100 receptions and 1,000 yards?

  15. #55
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    49,999
    Post Thanks / Like
    list the receivers who have great years with Brady, get a big contract from someone else and continue to excel.


    I'll wait.

  16. #56
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    6,159
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by McGinley View Post
    It's Brady. Give Welker Lolchez and his numbers go right back down.
    Not even Megatron would be Lolchez-proof.

    Good teams need good football players. Welker is good-to-excellent. Would the Jets be better with him? Yes. Will it be any kind of priority to pursue him? Probably not. Our needs list doesn't jibe with what Welker has to offer and some other team would snatch him provided the Pats themselves already haven't.

    And plenty of the clowns assessing how worthless Welker is were pretty resolute in calling for patience in letting the greatness of Sanchez emerge.

  17. #57
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    49,999
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GuidoYaztremski View Post
    Another great football post. Thanks.

    Where's those 12 wins you promised?
    I think Rah Rah meant this year + next year.

  18. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    3,016
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by FF2 View Post
    I think Rah Rah meant this year + next year.
    This guy gets it.

    pssst.... it's all the media's fault.

  19. #59
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mianus CT
    Posts
    7,673
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by fidelioion View Post
    Welker would not be good on the Jets. We have no QB.

    He would just be another over priced WR not producing.

    If Kerley were on the Pats he would be looking at an all-pro season.
    Yep until we get rid of suckchez we could have moss,rice,and Maynard and we would still suck

  20. #60
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Durham, CA
    Posts
    8,406
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by FF2 View Post
    I think Rah Rah meant this year + next year.
    Quote Originally Posted by GuidoYaztremski View Post
    This guy gets it.
    What about our playoff push, you trolling turdo's?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us