Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: The New York Jets: The Media Plague (Another Great Article)

  1. #1
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    凸(⊙▂⊙✖ )
    Posts
    30,985
    Post Thanks / Like

    Cool The New York Jets: The Media Plague (Another Great Article)

    And spot-****ing on, if you ask me. Great read.

    http://www.ganggreennation.com/2013/...e-media-plague


    The New York Jets: The Media Plague

    The beat reporters for the New York Jets have become a plague, taking a sickly patient (the team) and infesting them with yellow journalism.


    I have a bone to pick with "the media," but more specifically, the beat reporters that cover the New York Jets. I know they read this website, and some of them like to "borrow" our ideas for articles, so I know they're listening. Let me qualify this by saying that some reporters have been good, sporadically, throughout the season. But most have been horrible throughout. Here are a few of my complaints:

    They don't ask questions about the game.

    I know for a fact that some of the members of the beat (I too have anonymous and legitimate sources from within), do not know the first thing about football. This is why most of them, with one notable exception, do not actually write about the game. Instead, most focus on TMZ and personal-style articles. Sometimes it's good to "get to know" the players through their generally canned responses. But mostly, they're annoying and get away from the real crux of why you have a job, that is, the game of football. There have been numerous weeks this season when I don't think a single question was posed to Rex Ryan that related to the upcoming game, or even the preceding one. More often, they related to Tim Tebow, or anonymous sources, or whatever. But you almost never see actual X's and O's analysis from the beat reporters, or anything of substance. "Rex, Quinton Coples is being thrown into a complex playbook as a rookie. How do you break the playbook down for a rookie like Coples, as you did for Muhammad Wilkerson?" is a good question. So is, "Rex, Stephen Hill is having issues with catching the ball. What is the problem he's having, and how is it resolved from a coaching perspective?" "REX WHYYYY IS TEBOW (THE SECOND AND SOMETIMES THIRD-STRING QUARTERBACK THAT WAS INJURED FOR HALF THE YEAR) NOT PLAYING WHY AREN'T YOU ANSWERING US!??!!" is not. As we come into the New Year, please, PLEASE, give us more substantive questions about the actual game of football, instead of asking, I don't know, about Rex's personal conversations with players.


    They're unprofessional.

    If you follow the beat reporters on Twitter, you probably know how unprofessional they are. Generally, they are extremely snarky, especially when they don't get their way (which I'll get to more in my last point). Their comments include blasting Rex when he doesn't give them an answer they like, or mock the team through Same Ol' Jets comments, butt fumbles, "This awfulness is just unbelievable," and mocking individual players such as Tim Tebow, Jeremy Kerley, Shonn Greene, etc. It's one thing for fans to poke fun at the team they love. It's another thing for a professional reporter to mercilessly mock the team they cover. I went through a few of their individual timelines on Twitter for those examples, so while I'm not going to directly quote them, I think you get the idea.

    They stir the pot.
    Whether it's "anonymous sources" or confronting players in the locker room and nearly getting into fights, or literally chasing coaches out of the building, the beat reporters love to stir the pot and bake up controversy. After they do that, they then love to blame the Jets for being a circus. Now, that isn't to say the Jets don't often do really, really stupid stuff. They do. But if you look at, oh, I don't know, every other media market (and not just that, even with the New York Giants), you rarely see the media taking controversy like this, blowing it up infinitely, then blaming the team instead of themselves.

    They use anonymous sources.
    This is one reporter, in particular. As a general rule, anonymous sources are necessary in the media. It's how you get people to speak to you that would otherwise not. But when you nearly exclusively use anonymous sources, cherry pick quotes, and at the same time criticize the team for not being transparent enough, you're not only being hypocritical, you're destroying all credibility you have. Why should anyone trust what you have to say? When you never give an indication of who the source is, other than "team official," how does anyone know that official isn't a janitor, or worse, imaginary? There's zero reason to take anyone seriously that uses, as far as anyone can tell, pretend sources. Another point is that typically, the reporters confirm each other's reports. That never happens with this particular reporter. Is it because there is nobody to confirm them with? The so-called anonymous sources may be legitimate, but after being used almost exclusively, there is zero evidence to suggest that they are.


    Their analysis is lazy.

    All year long, the media mocks the Jets for talking too much, and for giving them milquetoast responses to their inane and repetitive questions. Since the season has ended, the team has gone silent as they self-evaluate. Before, they talked too much, and they were criticized for being undisciplined. Now they aren't speaking, and they're blasted for "not giving their fans answers." First of all, in my experience, the vast majority of fans don't care right now. They'd prefer to see answers through actions (hiring a new general manager and coaches) rather than the same banal answers. Do you think Rex is suddenly going to come out and say, "Tim Tebow is the worst. He's the biggest phony in the world!" now that the season is over? Come on. No, the real reason they're so, and excuse me for lack of a better word, butt hurt, is because now the beat reporters have to come up with their own analysis. For the first time as long as I can remember, the Jets aren't feeding them headlines on a golden spoon, accompanied with a side of controversy. And that makes the reporters mad, because now they have to do what every other beat reporter for every other team in the world has to do... work.

  2. #2
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    ft lauderdale
    Posts
    1,521
    Post Thanks / Like
    Keep it coming, eventually the masses will turn against the NY media

  3. #3
    All League
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,997
    Post Thanks / Like
    LOL..what questions about the games should they be asking?

    Why do you suck so bad?
    Why did your QB ride up the a$$ of Brandon Moore?
    Why does your QB suck?
    Why is your QB a turnover machine?
    Who are your receivers?
    Who are your playmakers?

    I mean, really, what game questions about his abomination of a season should they have asked, and, should they have asked, would we really care about their answers?

  4. #4
    All League
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,938
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Fishooked View Post
    And spot-****ing on, if you ask me. Great read.

    http://www.ganggreennation.com/2013/...e-media-plague


    The New York Jets: The Media Plague

    The beat reporters for the New York Jets have become a plague, taking a sickly patient (the team) and infesting them with yellow journalism.


    I have a bone to pick with "the media," but more specifically, the beat reporters that cover the New York Jets. I know they read this website, and some of them like to "borrow" our ideas for articles, so I know they're listening. Let me qualify this by saying that some reporters have been good, sporadically, throughout the season. But most have been horrible throughout. Here are a few of my complaints:

    They don't ask questions about the game.

    I know for a fact that some of the members of the beat (I too have anonymous and legitimate sources from within), do not know the first thing about football. This is why most of them, with one notable exception, do not actually write about the game. Instead, most focus on TMZ and personal-style articles. Sometimes it's good to "get to know" the players through their generally canned responses. But mostly, they're annoying and get away from the real crux of why you have a job, that is, the game of football. There have been numerous weeks this season when I don't think a single question was posed to Rex Ryan that related to the upcoming game, or even the preceding one. More often, they related to Tim Tebow, or anonymous sources, or whatever. But you almost never see actual X's and O's analysis from the beat reporters, or anything of substance. "Rex, Quinton Coples is being thrown into a complex playbook as a rookie. How do you break the playbook down for a rookie like Coples, as you did for Muhammad Wilkerson?" is a good question. So is, "Rex, Stephen Hill is having issues with catching the ball. What is the problem he's having, and how is it resolved from a coaching perspective?" "REX WHYYYY IS TEBOW (THE SECOND AND SOMETIMES THIRD-STRING QUARTERBACK THAT WAS INJURED FOR HALF THE YEAR) NOT PLAYING WHY AREN'T YOU ANSWERING US!??!!" is not. As we come into the New Year, please, PLEASE, give us more substantive questions about the actual game of football, instead of asking, I don't know, about Rex's personal conversations with players.


    They're unprofessional.

    If you follow the beat reporters on Twitter, you probably know how unprofessional they are. Generally, they are extremely snarky, especially when they don't get their way (which I'll get to more in my last point). Their comments include blasting Rex when he doesn't give them an answer they like, or mock the team through Same Ol' Jets comments, butt fumbles, "This awfulness is just unbelievable," and mocking individual players such as Tim Tebow, Jeremy Kerley, Shonn Greene, etc. It's one thing for fans to poke fun at the team they love. It's another thing for a professional reporter to mercilessly mock the team they cover. I went through a few of their individual timelines on Twitter for those examples, so while I'm not going to directly quote them, I think you get the idea.

    They stir the pot.
    Whether it's "anonymous sources" or confronting players in the locker room and nearly getting into fights, or literally chasing coaches out of the building, the beat reporters love to stir the pot and bake up controversy. After they do that, they then love to blame the Jets for being a circus. Now, that isn't to say the Jets don't often do really, really stupid stuff. They do. But if you look at, oh, I don't know, every other media market (and not just that, even with the New York Giants), you rarely see the media taking controversy like this, blowing it up infinitely, then blaming the team instead of themselves.

    They use anonymous sources.
    This is one reporter, in particular. As a general rule, anonymous sources are necessary in the media. It's how you get people to speak to you that would otherwise not. But when you nearly exclusively use anonymous sources, cherry pick quotes, and at the same time criticize the team for not being transparent enough, you're not only being hypocritical, you're destroying all credibility you have. Why should anyone trust what you have to say? When you never give an indication of who the source is, other than "team official," how does anyone know that official isn't a janitor, or worse, imaginary? There's zero reason to take anyone seriously that uses, as far as anyone can tell, pretend sources. Another point is that typically, the reporters confirm each other's reports. That never happens with this particular reporter. Is it because there is nobody to confirm them with? The so-called anonymous sources may be legitimate, but after being used almost exclusively, there is zero evidence to suggest that they are.


    Their analysis is lazy.

    All year long, the media mocks the Jets for talking too much, and for giving them milquetoast responses to their inane and repetitive questions. Since the season has ended, the team has gone silent as they self-evaluate. Before, they talked too much, and they were criticized for being undisciplined. Now they aren't speaking, and they're blasted for "not giving their fans answers." First of all, in my experience, the vast majority of fans don't care right now. They'd prefer to see answers through actions (hiring a new general manager and coaches) rather than the same banal answers. Do you think Rex is suddenly going to come out and say, "Tim Tebow is the worst. He's the biggest phony in the world!" now that the season is over? Come on. No, the real reason they're so, and excuse me for lack of a better word, butt hurt, is because now the beat reporters have to come up with their own analysis. For the first time as long as I can remember, the Jets aren't feeding them headlines on a golden spoon, accompanied with a side of controversy. And that makes the reporters mad, because now they have to do what every other beat reporter for every other team in the world has to do... work.
    Great read... Thanks for the post

  5. #5
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    One hour. from MetLife
    Posts
    21,447
    Post Thanks / Like
    New York is different than most places. We have three newspapers trying to sell papers as they slowly go down the tube. The back page sells papers.
    Tim Tebow sells papers. They have a hidden agenda. They write regular pieces but a scoop is a likely bonus.

    The Jets have a freedom of speech policy that plays into the media's hidden agenda. If you have an IQ above 105, you can see through the papers back page scam.It is kind of like what the National Enquirer does to get you to buy their trash.

  6. #6
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    凸(⊙▂⊙✖ )
    Posts
    30,985
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by ASH_1962 View Post
    LOL..what questions about the games should they be asking?

    Why do you suck so bad?
    Why did your QB ride up the a$$ of Brandon Moore?
    Why does your QB suck?
    Why is your QB a turnover machine?
    Who are your receivers?
    Who are your playmakers?

    I mean, really, what game questions about his abomination of a season should they have asked, and, should they have asked, would we really care about their answers?
    It's not just about this season, or this regime. It's been this way for as long as I can remember.

  7. #7
    All League
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    3,128
    Post Thanks / Like
    Yes, let's blame the media. Because, you know, the Jets didn't bring this upon themselves... *cough* Tebow... *cough* Rex guaranteeing Super Bowls before coaching one game... *cough* Brett Favre... *cough* Hard Knocks... *cough* I won't kiss Belichick's rings... *cough* "soon to be champs".... *cough* foot fetish... *cough* Santonio Holmes and Braylon Edwards and Antonio Cromartie and Bart Scott and what other look-at-me-look-at-me player am I missing??? Seriously, anyone complaining that the media treated the Jets like a tabloid soap opera needs to seriously give it a rest.

  8. #8
    All League
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,680
    Post Thanks / Like
    I hate when blog articles that have REALLY GOOD CONTENT are plagued with a lack of paragraphs and overall poor writing.

    This is a really great message, but unfortunately most people will dismiss it as the rant of some basement dweller. The journalists in question will no doubt use the amateurism of the writing to deflect the difficult introspection the message requires.

  9. #9
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Un-Pleasantville
    Posts
    6,436
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Toooon View Post
    Yes, let's blame the media. Because, you know, the Jets didn't bring this upon themselves... *cough* Tebow... *cough* Rex guaranteeing Super Bowls before coaching one game... *cough* Brett Favre... *cough* Hard Knocks... *cough* I won't kiss Belichick's rings... *cough* "soon to be champs".... *cough* foot fetish... *cough* Santonio Holmes and Braylon Edwards and Antonio Cromartie and Bart Scott and what other look-at-me-look-at-me player am I missing??? Seriously, anyone complaining that the media treated the Jets like a tabloid soap opera needs to seriously give it a rest.
    Rex had Brett Favre? You got the stuff to be a beat writer!

  10. #10
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,655
    Post Thanks / Like
    thank you. as bad as the team as been, the reporters have really let us down as well.

  11. #11
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    凸(⊙▂⊙✖ )
    Posts
    30,985
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Toooon View Post
    Yes, let's blame the media. Because, you know, the Jets didn't bring this upon themselves... *cough* Tebow... *cough* Rex guaranteeing Super Bowls before coaching one game... *cough* Brett Favre... *cough* Hard Knocks... *cough* I won't kiss Belichick's rings... *cough* "soon to be champs".... *cough* foot fetish... *cough* Santonio Holmes and Braylon Edwards and Antonio Cromartie and Bart Scott and what other look-at-me-look-at-me player am I missing??? Seriously, anyone complaining that the media treated the Jets like a tabloid soap opera needs to seriously give it a rest.
    Well no ****. Haven't already been beaten those topics into the ground repeatedly already?

    We all know this.

    The point is the Jets have already stated they'll address the media on Jan 8th All of a sudden the media that loves to kill the jets for talking too much is complaining about the fact that they are actually taking a conservative approach and hoping to have a GM in place by then.

  12. #12
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    19,560
    Post Thanks / Like
    The press sucks. But they have nothing to do with the team sucking.

  13. #13
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Greenwich Village, NY
    Posts
    2,242
    Post Thanks / Like
    The jets beat writers are basically the Scott templeton character from "The Wire" come to life

  14. #14
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    凸(⊙▂⊙✖ )
    Posts
    30,985
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Astoria View Post
    I hate when blog articles that have REALLY GOOD CONTENT are plagued with a lack of paragraphs and overall poor writing.

    This is a really great message, but unfortunately most people will dismiss it as the rant of some basement dweller. The journalists in question will no doubt use the amateurism of the writing to deflect the difficult introspection the message requires.
    Its a sports blog about a football team, not The Economist.
    The journalists in question (most likely Mehta, Cimini, Serby, etc) don't strike me as writing better pieces either.

  15. #15
    Undrafted Free Agent
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Amsterdam, NL
    Posts
    128
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Fishooked View Post
    And spot-****ing on, if you ask me. Great read.

    http://www.ganggreennation.com/2013/...e-media-plague


    The New York Jets: The Media Plague

    The beat reporters for the New York Jets have become a plague, taking a sickly patient (the team) and infesting them with yellow journalism.


    I have a bone to pick with "the media," but more specifically, the beat reporters that cover the New York Jets. I know they read this website, and some of them like to "borrow" our ideas for articles, so I know they're listening. Let me qualify this by saying that some reporters have been good, sporadically, throughout the season. But most have been horrible throughout. Here are a few of my complaints:

    They don't ask questions about the game.

    I know for a fact that some of the members of the beat (I too have anonymous and legitimate sources from within), do not know the first thing about football. This is why most of them, with one notable exception, do not actually write about the game. Instead, most focus on TMZ and personal-style articles. Sometimes it's good to "get to know" the players through their generally canned responses. But mostly, they're annoying and get away from the real crux of why you have a job, that is, the game of football. There have been numerous weeks this season when I don't think a single question was posed to Rex Ryan that related to the upcoming game, or even the preceding one. More often, they related to Tim Tebow, or anonymous sources, or whatever. But you almost never see actual X's and O's analysis from the beat reporters, or anything of substance. "Rex, Quinton Coples is being thrown into a complex playbook as a rookie. How do you break the playbook down for a rookie like Coples, as you did for Muhammad Wilkerson?" is a good question. So is, "Rex, Stephen Hill is having issues with catching the ball. What is the problem he's having, and how is it resolved from a coaching perspective?" "REX WHYYYY IS TEBOW (THE SECOND AND SOMETIMES THIRD-STRING QUARTERBACK THAT WAS INJURED FOR HALF THE YEAR) NOT PLAYING WHY AREN'T YOU ANSWERING US!??!!" is not. As we come into the New Year, please, PLEASE, give us more substantive questions about the actual game of football, instead of asking, I don't know, about Rex's personal conversations with players.


    They're unprofessional.

    If you follow the beat reporters on Twitter, you probably know how unprofessional they are. Generally, they are extremely snarky, especially when they don't get their way (which I'll get to more in my last point). Their comments include blasting Rex when he doesn't give them an answer they like, or mock the team through Same Ol' Jets comments, butt fumbles, "This awfulness is just unbelievable," and mocking individual players such as Tim Tebow, Jeremy Kerley, Shonn Greene, etc. It's one thing for fans to poke fun at the team they love. It's another thing for a professional reporter to mercilessly mock the team they cover. I went through a few of their individual timelines on Twitter for those examples, so while I'm not going to directly quote them, I think you get the idea.

    They stir the pot.
    Whether it's "anonymous sources" or confronting players in the locker room and nearly getting into fights, or literally chasing coaches out of the building, the beat reporters love to stir the pot and bake up controversy. After they do that, they then love to blame the Jets for being a circus. Now, that isn't to say the Jets don't often do really, really stupid stuff. They do. But if you look at, oh, I don't know, every other media market (and not just that, even with the New York Giants), you rarely see the media taking controversy like this, blowing it up infinitely, then blaming the team instead of themselves.

    They use anonymous sources.
    This is one reporter, in particular. As a general rule, anonymous sources are necessary in the media. It's how you get people to speak to you that would otherwise not. But when you nearly exclusively use anonymous sources, cherry pick quotes, and at the same time criticize the team for not being transparent enough, you're not only being hypocritical, you're destroying all credibility you have. Why should anyone trust what you have to say? When you never give an indication of who the source is, other than "team official," how does anyone know that official isn't a janitor, or worse, imaginary? There's zero reason to take anyone seriously that uses, as far as anyone can tell, pretend sources. Another point is that typically, the reporters confirm each other's reports. That never happens with this particular reporter. Is it because there is nobody to confirm them with? The so-called anonymous sources may be legitimate, but after being used almost exclusively, there is zero evidence to suggest that they are.


    Their analysis is lazy.

    All year long, the media mocks the Jets for talking too much, and for giving them milquetoast responses to their inane and repetitive questions. Since the season has ended, the team has gone silent as they self-evaluate. Before, they talked too much, and they were criticized for being undisciplined. Now they aren't speaking, and they're blasted for "not giving their fans answers." First of all, in my experience, the vast majority of fans don't care right now. They'd prefer to see answers through actions (hiring a new general manager and coaches) rather than the same banal answers. Do you think Rex is suddenly going to come out and say, "Tim Tebow is the worst. He's the biggest phony in the world!" now that the season is over? Come on. No, the real reason they're so, and excuse me for lack of a better word, butt hurt, is because now the beat reporters have to come up with their own analysis. For the first time as long as I can remember, the Jets aren't feeding them headlines on a golden spoon, accompanied with a side of controversy. And that makes the reporters mad, because now they have to do what every other beat reporter for every other team in the world has to do... work.
    Hahaha.....Great article cuz they didn't say bad thing about the Jets. I got it.

  16. #16
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Un-Pleasantville
    Posts
    6,436
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Tai-Mai-Shu View Post
    Hahaha.....Great article cuz they didn't say bad thing about the Jets. I got it.
    We got U and the other SOJfs for that Vick

  17. #17
    All League
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    2,782
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Toooon View Post
    Yes, let's blame the media. Because, you know, the Jets didn't bring this upon themselves... *cough* Tebow... *cough* Rex guaranteeing Super Bowls before coaching one game... *cough* Brett Favre... *cough* Hard Knocks... *cough* I won't kiss Belichick's rings... *cough* "soon to be champs".... *cough* foot fetish... *cough* Santonio Holmes and Braylon Edwards and Antonio Cromartie and Bart Scott and what other look-at-me-look-at-me player am I missing??? Seriously, anyone complaining that the media treated the Jets like a tabloid soap opera needs to seriously give it a rest.
    Who is blaming the media or complaining? Thats what you got from reading that article? It was simply pointing out the utter lack of professionalism by those who are supposedly at the pinnacle of their profession.

  18. #18
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,470
    Post Thanks / Like
    Great read. Agree with Scott salmon's views on the media.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us