No team with ZERO honest wins (without cheating) should be mentioned in "dynasty" conversations. Pasterisks never won a SB. They got awarded some, but this is a different story
No team with ZERO honest wins (without cheating) should be mentioned in "dynasty" conversations. Pasterisks never won a SB. They got awarded some, but this is a different story
Dynasty talk is so retarded because it's all arbitrary. What defines a dynasty is so subjective I don't know why people post about this ****. It's like arguing about what constitutes the perfect set of breasts.
PS - the answer is small nipples, small, pink areola and enough size that there is cleavage.
In all seriousness, what difference does it make to us, Jets Fans?
We're not the Pats. We're not the Ravens. We have no horse in the debate.
I'd much rather read a debate about the differences between Champion QB's like Flacco and Brady, and QB's like Sanchez.
Can our man ever do what Flacco did yesterday? Thats what I care about.
in the salary cap era there will be few if any dynasties
one quibble with the post that talked about the "history of the league"
I think there were a few dynasties long before the 1960s Packers
think Monsters of the Midway for one
but, I'll just let anyone who really cares look up the league champions since 1926 and get the answers themselves
Ravens 2 legit SB
NE Cheaters 0
end of discussion.
The biggest difference SAR forgot to mention is they have at least one other team to contend with in their division, unlike the Patriots.
So in 2013, we consider 2 championships in 13 years a dynasty?
What's gonna happen in 2018?
Speaking of the Pats' dynasty, here's a shirtless Gronk partying after the Super Bowl. At least this time he was not dancing on a broken ankle. But that Stone cold stunner with the broken forearm at the end probably wasn't the brightest thing to do.
http://www.tmz.com/2013/02/04/rob-gr...eo-broken-arm/
Last edited by BamaJets; 02-05-2013 at 03:21 AM.
Bookmarks