Reply With QuoteNo team with ZERO honest wins (without cheating) should be mentioned in "dynasty" conversations. Pasterisks never won a SB. They got awarded some, but this is a different story
Relax with the stupid stuff.Originally Posted by PatsFanTX
I know its hard.
No team with ZERO honest wins (without cheating) should be mentioned in "dynasty" conversations. Pasterisks never won a SB. They got awarded some, but this is a different story
Yesss. What he said!
Easy answer: Neither are anywhere close to a dynasty.
Dynasty talk is so retarded because it's all arbitrary. What defines a dynasty is so subjective I don't know why people post about this ****. It's like arguing about what constitutes the perfect set of breasts.
PS - the answer is small nipples, small, pink areola and enough size that there is cleavage.
I know I'm nitpicking and I don't disagree with your overall premise, but has Sergio Kindle even played a down with the Ravens? If he did, the number of plays could probably be counted on 1 hand. He was waived when Suggs came back.
Really?????? CLOSE THREAD, LOL
In all seriousness, what difference does it make to us, Jets Fans?
We're not the Pats. We're not the Ravens. We have no horse in the debate.
I'd much rather read a debate about the differences between Champion QB's like Flacco and Brady, and QB's like Sanchez.
Can our man ever do what Flacco did yesterday? Thats what I care about.
Because the Pats and Jets have a pretty fun rivalry that some people take too seriously and it's why you have threads about spygate 5 years after the fact or threads on patsfans about every little thing Rex says.
The Cowboys winning 3 SB in 4 years, and losing in the NFC championship game the other year doesn't count?
And without Brady and cheating your team would have:What a stupid comment.
Those "great" Jets drafts the last half decade has yielded the following:
0 Division titles
0 AFC Championships
0 Super Bowl titles
Yep, great job.
0 Division titles
0 AFC Championships
0 Super Bowl titles
And Bellichich would be a DC somewhere, maybe.
Exactly, not including them is silly.
in the salary cap era there will be few if any dynasties
one quibble with the post that talked about the "history of the league"
I think there were a few dynasties long before the 1960s Packers
think Monsters of the Midway for one
but, I'll just let anyone who really cares look up the league champions since 1926 and get the answers themselves
Ravens 2 legit SB
NE Cheaters 0
end of discussion.
No he can't..... And I agree with you.
whether our neighbors drive a Mercedes lease, bought or stolen, who cares.
We have a Yugo.
THIS. Whatever helps SAR sleep better at night. The Ravens are the true team of the... umm... errr... 2000s? Or something?But anyway it's so much more impressive than what the Patriots did, so all Jets fans, jump for joy!
The biggest difference SAR forgot to mention is they have at least one other team to contend with in their division, unlike the Patriots.
So in 2013, we consider 2 championships in 13 years a dynasty?
What's gonna happen in 2018?
No, there has been no Ravens dynasty. The Pats have the dynasty label. The Media rules the roost... Pats are excellent but unfortunate, Jets are a joke... it's the standard thing to say.
Speaking of the Pats' dynasty, here's a shirtless Gronk partying after the Super Bowl. At least this time he was not dancing on a broken ankle. But that Stone cold stunner with the broken forearm at the end probably wasn't the brightest thing to do.
http://www.tmz.com/2013/02/04/rob-gr...eo-broken-arm/
Last edited by BamaJets; 02-05-2013 at 03:21 AM.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks