And now Raymond's been broken down to the point that he can communicate only by markings. Truly remarkable.
What has he accomplished the last 2 years?
Led the Jets to a 10-18 record, missed the playoffs 2 straight years, was the statistically the worst starting QB in the league and led the entire NFL in turnovers.
Good call on Sanchez's ability as a NFL QB.
The last time you were banned the board was so much better because of it.
You have no clue when to STFU. You have serious issues!
If you guys truly want competition for Sanchez then you should go with Garrard. The age and injury issues are a concern for sure, but when healthy he is a better quarterback than Matt Moore and will cost less as well. However, the biggest issue with getting Matt Moore is that he is a notoriously bad practice player. Steps up in games for sure, but if you guys really want somebody that can take Sanchez' job in training camp, or at least provide competition, Matt Moore probably isn't the guy. I still think he's a better quarterback, at least based on what Sanchez has shown the last couple of years, and he would probably play better during games, but for whatever reason he just sucks in practice, and based on his training camp with the dolphins last year, he's probably the one quarterback that Sanchez could beat out.
Too many are writing Sanchez off, they could be right, but right now, it's not a forgone conclusion, Sanchez does, and will get that final chance. And as I also acknowledged, the Jets will smartly prepare for either scenario, that he can perservere or that he fails.
You were the one that claimed Sanchez was a great pick, you mimmicked Carroll's comments about him coming out. Do you think we forget this? And now you're trying to spin this around on others? LOL, you are a joke.Good call on Sanchez's ability as a NFL QB.
Last edited by Ray Ray19; 03-01-2013 at 09:43 AM.
You said that the day the kid was drafted I believe. You can keep ripping Mark now because you find it f*cking hilarious to sit on a Jets board and troll for reaction, but no one that's been here for that long is going to forget it. Most of us know you do this for sh*ts and giggles, but when you derail almost every thread it gets tiresome.
I don't know if Sanchez can bounce back from the past two years but to say that he was "along for the ride" in 2010 is absolute non-sense (sorry McDawg, you know I still <3 ya). His numbers weren't anything to write home about, but his play was much better. Pats week 2, Miami week 3, Buffalo week 4, the 3 comebacks, Pitt and Chicago were all really good performances. He then played great in the playoffs and we thought we were set at the position for the next 10+ years. In short, his 2010 season was the polar opposite of his 2011 season (Solid numbers but in reality, sh*t play).
We're going to draft a QB early (2nd/3rd round) and bring in a vet, but if you think for one second that this team isn't deep down hoping that the QB they're paying a massive amount of money and spent a high draft pick on cant somehow turn it around with Mornhinweg, who is a solid when it comes to the development of QB's and runs an offense suited perfectly for Mark, then you are completely delusional. If he fails, he fails. We'll be ready. But he's going to get another shot. Like I said to the Revis freaks around here regarding that mess, the sooner you accept this, the softer the blow will be for you when it actually happens.
I would absolutely take Garrard over Quinn. Garrard can be a legitimate average starting QB if the injury issues are good.
And c'mon..He hasn't always sucked..Geez, people have short memories...You don't win 11 games in '10 and then beat Manning in Indy (leading a drive to kick the GW FG) and Brady in NE with a "always sucked" QB...