Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 141 to 145 of 145

Thread: We have the worst receiving corps in the NFL.

  1. #141
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
    RB/TE part of receiving core.

    Steve Smith, Deangelo, Olsen, Stewart > Holmes, Ivory, Goodsen, Cumberland

    Bowe and Charles >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holmes and Ivory

    Richardson is going to be a pro bowler next year.


    We don't have a weapon.
    We had no weapons last season yet we would have steamrolled the Chiefs had we played.

  2. #142
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,314
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by detjetsfan View Post
    We had no weapons last season yet we would have steamrolled the Chiefs had we played.
    That team was in disarray. No QB/HC/Injuries. Watch them win 8 games this year.

    Bowe > Holmes

    McCluster = Kerley

    Baldwin = Hill

    Charles >>> Ivory

    Moaki, Fasano > Cumberland

  3. #143
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
    That team was in disarray. No QB/HC/Injuries. Watch them win 8 games this year.

    Bowe > Holmes

    McCluster = Kerley

    Baldwin = Hill

    Charles >>> Ivory

    Moaki, Fasano > Cumberland
    Stick to fantasy football dude they are a 5 or 6 win team. They did nothing in the draft Joeckel is just a replacement for Albert and they cut Winston. Broncos and Chargers are both better and Raiders will probably split with them.

  4. #144
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,914
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
    RB/TE part of receiving core.

    Steve Smith, Deangelo, Olsen, Stewart > Holmes, Ivory, Goodsen, Cumberland

    Bowe and Charles >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holmes and Ivory

    Richardson is going to be a pro bowler next year.


    We don't have a weapon.
    Running and blocking are not receiving. Kerley, Hill, Holmes, Goodson, Cumby, and Gates are > then those teams cores overall. The 300-500 yards extra they get from their TEs and RB dont make up for not having good #2 and 3 WRs. WE have options too. Id rather my better receiving options be our WRs most of the time. Holmes, Kerley, and Hill are all guys I feel confident in getting 800-1000 yards if given the ball. All Cumby can do is catch IMO, he just cant do anything else. Ivory and Goodson are also better options receiving then an old Williams and Stewart. Not even a contest vs Carolina IMO they have no play makers at all on that O out side of their QB. As for KC Hill and Kerley are way better option the McCluster lol and Avery. Charles is good but has never put up 700-800 yards receiving. His best year 468 Goodson's 310. Not a huge diff and he has had some serious injuries.

  5. #145
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,914
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by K-Ro 25 View Post
    That team was in disarray. No QB/HC/Injuries. Watch them win 8 games this year.

    Bowe > Holmes

    McCluster = Kerley

    Baldwin = Hill

    Charles >>> Ivory

    Moaki, Fasano > Cumberland
    your nuts Kerley has better career stats then McCluster easy and with one less year

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us