Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Raiders, Broncos interested in S Charles Woodson. Shouldn't Jets be?

  1. #21
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ (Jets Stadium Section 246)
    Posts
    35,668
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Raider9175 View Post
    Charles Woodson coming back where it all started. Welcome Home Chuck.

    Glazer says C-Wood signed!!

    Jay Glazer‏@JayGlazer2m
    Again, Raiders and Charles Woodson have agreed to terms.

    DJ Hayden and Taiwan Jones could get some nice pointers from Mr Woodson.
    Well he's old.


    And kinda sucks.































    And is also old.

  2. #22
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Big Apple, USA
    Posts
    22,030
    Post Thanks / Like
    Old
    Slow
    Washed up
    Not as good as Cro, Wilson, Milliner

    Perfect fit for Crazy Al's halfwit son

    Reminds me of the Jets signings of R Lott, S Atwater, T Law and A Monk

    Of course R 9175 is leapimg with glee

    As he was about C Palmer and J Russell
    Last edited by sg3; 05-22-2013 at 04:56 AM.

  3. #23
    All League
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4,680
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Buzzsaw View Post
    Wouldnt be a bad idea, depending on how much he'd want. People here are overestimating our secondary - Revis and Landry are HUGE losses. And our "2nd ranked pass defense" was bogus, teams were able to easily run on us.

    If Idzik is just looking towards the future, then yeah, no need for Woodson. But he'd certainly help our team in 2013.
    True. To go from 4-12 to 5-11.
    This season is lost, it's main purpose is to break in new players and Geno. The rest is not that relevant (albeit I always root for Jets to win).

  4. #24
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    9,407
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Raider9175 View Post
    Charles Woodson coming back where it all started. Welcome Home Chuck.

    Glazer says C-Wood signed!!

    Jay Glazer‏@JayGlazer2m
    Again, Raiders and Charles Woodson have agreed to terms.

    DJ Hayden and Taiwan Jones could get some nice pointers from Mr Woodson.
    4-12

  5. #25
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    14,473
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by jetstream23 View Post
    Teaching the younger guys, filling a big hole or providing depth at the Safety position.



    We're not building around Calvin Pace or Willie Colon either but we signed them for depth and some veteran presence.
    Because in one case we had no young players whose development might be hindered by the player taking playing time (Pace) and in the other playing a "developmental" prospect could lead to getting your QB or other long-term parts damaged (Colon).

    At safety, the Jets have three young players with potential - Jarrett, Bush, and Allen. They may all end up as no more than special teamers - but in a year like this, it's much better to find out whether they can be more than to sign a hold-the-fort veteran. At the end of the year, if they all turn out to be the back of the roster players they likely are, you are in no worse place than you would have been had you signed a vet to a 1 year deal - needing a long term solution at the position. (Actually, in a slightly better position since you have more knowledge of the in-house assets to inform that decision). If one pans out, on the other hand, you are in significantly better position, having closed a long term hole with a cheap player under team control for another few years.

    There's literally no upside to a Woodson type signing if they are not a win-now team. And they aren't.

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,211
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by sg3 View Post
    Old
    Slow
    Washed up
    Not as good as Cro, Wilson, Milliner

    Perfect fit for Crazy Al's halfwit son

    Reminds me of the Jets signings of R Lott, S Atwater, T Law and A Monk

    Of course R 9175 is leapimg with glee

    As he was about C Palmer and J Russell
    You do know the difference between the CB position and the FS position. C Woodson isn't playing CB, but safety. So what FS do the Jets have that is better or would start over C Woodson. 2011 Charles made the AP Probowl team at CB and just was injured in 2012.

    SG3 Raiders have had just a little better luck(knowing who could still play and who can't) with older players in the secondary- Ronnie Lott- gave Raiders some great seasons before they let him go to the Jets, Albert Lewis, Rod Woodson and Now Charles Woodson. (who upgrades the secondary tremendously)
    Last edited by Raider9175; 05-22-2013 at 08:55 AM.

  7. #27
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    The Big Apple, USA
    Posts
    22,030
    Post Thanks / Like
    Glad you are happy with another washed up retread that was a huge embarrassment last season

    You're right though, even on his rascal, problem better than pretty much anything else on the Raydaz

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,211
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by sg3 View Post
    Glad you are happy with another washed up retread that was a huge embarrassment last season

    You're right though, even on his rascal, problem better than pretty much anything else on the Raydaz
    I'm very happy SG3 with this signing. Makes the Raiders secondary very good and the young guys in that secondary have a mentor to lean on for support.
    You do know C Woodson was hurt in 2012. He made the first team All AP Probowl team at CB in 2011 .(not to shabby for a guy his age)

    These kind of signing in the secondary have always paid off for the Raiders in the past, and I look for this one to work out just as well.
    http://www.nfl.com/top100/2013#video=0ap2000000165131
    Last edited by Raider9175; 05-22-2013 at 09:24 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us