Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 109

Thread: GREETING Mitches

  1. #21
    Seriously, the JAZZ HEAD thread needs Borgo. Something better be done and soon.

  2. #22
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ (Jets Stadium Section 246)
    Posts
    36,600
    Can't we all just get along?

    A man in the Massachusetts suburb of Rhode Island is dead now people! Dead!

    How much longer does this have to go on? How many more bodies have to pile up before Borgo is back?























    .

  3. #23
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Un-Pleasantville
    Posts
    6,538
    Quote Originally Posted by Gata View Post
    It's been a while how's everyone?

    Is ragu still sharing too much of his love life?

    Did Southside ever lose his V-Card?

    Did the meet-up ever happen?

    Who got banned?



    WHAT DID I MISS?
    Tired of teasing JN already?

  4. #24
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Un-Pleasantville
    Posts
    6,538
    Quote Originally Posted by PlumberKhan View Post
    Holy.



    F*cking.



    Hell.



    In.



    A.



    Hand basket.



    BG is Apache?!?!?!?
    Apache is not a patch on BG.

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Apache 51 View Post
    After reading the two threads, I want to take a few minutes to correct a few things and, if possible, clear my name.



    First, I never had a problem with SOOTH 86ing the Hotties Forum. I didn't like it, as we have lost tons of creative, and often funny, posts. But, as 32Green (from the PM I sent him after the forum's expunging) will attest, I encouraged SOOTH to abandon the Hotties Forum. Why? Because if JI.com is so dependent upon advertising revenue, that place was an accident (nip and/or lip slip)waiting to happen. I even wrote that I understood the move in several posts in the Hampur.



    My jibes were directly related to the "advertiser" who saw fit to call SOOTH on the carpet for the image(s). They were also targeted at the removal of most of my post count, for which I received no explanation. Was I being punished for a Hotties Forum image(s)? I asked politely several times, but all I received back rom various moderators were goofy responses. I felt like Josef K. in Kafka's The Trial, only with better penmanship.



    Several folks have written that they don't understand how people like me can be so serious about an internet community. To them, I say you missed the ball by a mile. Probably why no one knows who you are.



    Virtually every day, for years, I have logged on here to contribute something. Humor, perspective, a pat on the back to a friend (yes, a friend) who may be going through a health challenge or loss of a loved one or pet, etc. To take all that away without explanation bothered me as well as belittling what I have tried to create. You don't understand it? Fine, I digged being here hanging out with my buddies.



    In the now fateful 32Green Thread, the only reason I mentioned the Hotties Forum incident was to poke fun at 32, tying in the the question of where he had gone (see post #4 in that thread). Then, it was to respond to Mr. Churchill, who asked the question: "By the way, anyone else lol over Advertisor-Gate, when half the ads I get at JI are things like "DateMyOldMilf.lol" and "AsianMailOrderBrides.lol"?" (See post #5)



    Next, I responded to Churchill saying that I had received an advert from a Taiwanese dating service. After seeing another ad with a scantily clad woman, I quoted Churchill's post again to further illustrate the point. No disrespect was meant to SOOTH or his action vis-a-vis the Hotties Thread. Instead, it was a slap at the hypocrisy of the advertiser.



    It is at this point when "the moderator in question" chose to be a bit snippy with me (see post #10), to which I corrected his posting and called him a "dunce".



    Next, "the moderator" decided to make it personal, implying that I frequented Asian porn sites (which I do not; I know, you're all stunned), etc. To which, I responded in my terse tone and strong language. The reason? As I pointed out in that posting (#17 for those following along), "the moderator in question" had seen fit to chastise me two other times before this incident. We tried to hash it out both on the board and in PMs. For some reason only "the moderator in question" can divulge, he decided to make it personal (making the medical/psychological determination that I have emotional issues, etc.) and adversarial.



    (ASIDE: Not sure what folks don't understand, but almost all the images I have ever posted came directly from Google Image. The "art" I bring to it is going through myriad photos to find ones displaying sexiness or some other characteristic of attractiveness. On my son's life, I have never been on one dating site, of any ethnicity.)



    For me, that crossed the line, engendering my angry reaction. I stand by it. Men of my generation and background, taken beyond a certain point, will almost always react similarly. "The moderator in question" actually got off easy. Literally, I've seen folks get punched up for less.



    Think I'm imagining all this? That "the moderator in question" is being unfairly targeted? Is just everyone's bestest (sic) buddy? Go read "the moderator in question's" response to Churchill after my post.



    Notice how "the moderator in question" also tries to belittle Churchill, who will have none of it and swats him down mightily. But not before "the moderator in question" does what all do who have been outmatched intellectually and have no argument: He gives him a shrug and says he doesn't care (see post 42). Right. Just as "the moderator in question" in this thread who said: "Like I said, I get it. Whatever. You're all imaginary Internet beings anyway." What a great guy. Certainly worthy of garnering our respect.



    So, many of you folks think calling a person a scumbag and instructing him to go f**k himself is inductive of a "meltdown". Really? These are words/phrases which have never been used in this forum? Meltdown? Give me a break. Talk about candy ass.



    Again, read my post. I outline clearly that "the moderator in question" has approached me similarly on other occasions and IMO has overstepped his moderating authority by making it personal and antagonizing me. Again, in the same spot, I'd do exactly the same thing. So would most of you.



    And that brings me to how so many of you reacted in the two threads. Calling me emotionally unstable, in need of dosage corrections to my medications, how I had gone completely off the rails, etc. Again, really? Unlike my actions, this is the definition of overreaction.



    Almost daily, I read in various threads how men today act like p*ssies, how we are raising a generation of wimpy kids, etc. But I react how men of my generation do and I'm chastised for it (not the banning, but the ridiculous reactions from many in the thread depicting me as a loon)? Please. "The moderator in question" knew what he was doing. So did I.



    A couple of quick notes:



    --Tons of hilarious posts/Bollywood stuff. Well done,muchachos.



    --No, I am not Jets88NY.



    -- Two year banning is a "place holder"? LOL. Right.



    --In these times of "adversity", you really see a person's/friend's true mettle as well as being completely surprised by the compassion, loyalty and friendship of unexpected others. Thank you all so very much.



    -- To Raoul Duke: I know you are a friend of "the moderator in question", so respect that you are defending him. But your characterization of me is misguided at best. Maybe in France folks threaten to "contact my State's Attorney General". But here in the US, stuff like that is a joke. Go back and read the Bozo's Thread. Even JW came to understand its intent. Again, on my son's life, unlike my terse response to "the moderator in question", that was a designed, yet poorly executed, goof. The only real aspects were my thinly veiled shots at JetsBabe, which I regret to thuis day.



    Okay, so I hope this has not bored you all to tears. It's just frustrating to sit by whilst your character is being assassinated (by some) and incorrect statements are being made. IMO, it's bad form to rip someone when they are unable to defend themselves.



    Thanks for listening, gents. This is a one take, so please forgive syntactical/grammatical/spelling errors.



    BG

    AND I GET NO SHOUT OUT ... I'm appalled !

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Jungle Shift Jet View Post
    Tired of teasing JN already?
    Tease is my middle name

  7. #27
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    凸(⊙▂⊙✖ )
    Posts
    31,821
    Quote Originally Posted by Gata View Post
    AND I GET NO SHOUT OUT ... I'm appalled !
    Shout-outs are for posters 1000 posts and up

  8. #28
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The depths of Despair.
    Posts
    40,159
    Quote Originally Posted by Apache 51 View Post
    After reading the two threads, I want to take a few minutes to correct a few things and, if possible, clear my name.



    First, I never had a problem with SOOTH 86ing the Hotties Forum. I didn't like it, as we have lost tons of creative, and often funny, posts. But, as 32Green (from the PM I sent him after the forum's expunging) will attest, I encouraged SOOTH to abandon the Hotties Forum. Why? Because if JI.com is so dependent upon advertising revenue, that place was an accident (nip and/or lip slip)waiting to happen. I even wrote that I understood the move in several posts in the Hampur.



    My jibes were directly related to the "advertiser" who saw fit to call SOOTH on the carpet for the image(s). They were also targeted at the removal of most of my post count, for which I received no explanation. Was I being punished for a Hotties Forum image(s)? I asked politely several times, but all I received back rom various moderators were goofy responses. I felt like Josef K. in Kafka's The Trial, only with better penmanship.



    Several folks have written that they don't understand how people like me can be so serious about an internet community. To them, I say you missed the ball by a mile. Probably why no one knows who you are.



    Virtually every day, for years, I have logged on here to contribute something. Humor, perspective, a pat on the back to a friend (yes, a friend) who may be going through a health challenge or loss of a loved one or pet, etc. To take all that away without explanation bothered me as well as belittling what I have tried to create. You don't understand it? Fine, I digged being here hanging out with my buddies.



    In the now fateful 32Green Thread, the only reason I mentioned the Hotties Forum incident was to poke fun at 32, tying in the the question of where he had gone (see post #4 in that thread). Then, it was to respond to Mr. Churchill, who asked the question: "By the way, anyone else lol over Advertisor-Gate, when half the ads I get at JI are things like "DateMyOldMilf.lol" and "AsianMailOrderBrides.lol"?" (See post #5)



    Next, I responded to Churchill saying that I had received an advert from a Taiwanese dating service. After seeing another ad with a scantily clad woman, I quoted Churchill's post again to further illustrate the point. No disrespect was meant to SOOTH or his action vis-a-vis the Hotties Thread. Instead, it was a slap at the hypocrisy of the advertiser.



    It is at this point when "the moderator in question" chose to be a bit snippy with me (see post #10), to which I corrected his posting and called him a "dunce".



    Next, "the moderator" decided to make it personal, implying that I frequented Asian porn sites (which I do not; I know, you're all stunned), etc. To which, I responded in my terse tone and strong language. The reason? As I pointed out in that posting (#17 for those following along), "the moderator in question" had seen fit to chastise me two other times before this incident. We tried to hash it out both on the board and in PMs. For some reason only "the moderator in question" can divulge, he decided to make it personal (making the medical/psychological determination that I have emotional issues, etc.) and adversarial.



    (ASIDE: Not sure what folks don't understand, but almost all the images I have ever posted came directly from Google Image. The "art" I bring to it is going through myriad photos to find ones displaying sexiness or some other characteristic of attractiveness. On my son's life, I have never been on one dating site, of any ethnicity.)



    For me, that crossed the line, engendering my angry reaction. I stand by it. Men of my generation and background, taken beyond a certain point, will almost always react similarly. "The moderator in question" actually got off easy. Literally, I've seen folks get punched up for less.



    Think I'm imagining all this? That "the moderator in question" is being unfairly targeted? Is just everyone's bestest (sic) buddy? Go read "the moderator in question's" response to Churchill after my post.



    Notice how "the moderator in question" also tries to belittle Churchill, who will have none of it and swats him down mightily. But not before "the moderator in question" does what all do who have been outmatched intellectually and have no argument: He gives him a shrug and says he doesn't care (see post 42). Right. Just as "the moderator in question" in this thread who said: "Like I said, I get it. Whatever. You're all imaginary Internet beings anyway." What a great guy. Certainly worthy of garnering our respect.



    So, many of you folks think calling a person a scumbag and instructing him to go f**k himself is inductive of a "meltdown". Really? These are words/phrases which have never been used in this forum? Meltdown? Give me a break. Talk about candy ass.



    Again, read my post. I outline clearly that "the moderator in question" has approached me similarly on other occasions and IMO has overstepped his moderating authority by making it personal and antagonizing me. Again, in the same spot, I'd do exactly the same thing. So would most of you.



    And that brings me to how so many of you reacted in the two threads. Calling me emotionally unstable, in need of dosage corrections to my medications, how I had gone completely off the rails, etc. Again, really? Unlike my actions, this is the definition of overreaction.



    Almost daily, I read in various threads how men today act like p*ssies, how we are raising a generation of wimpy kids, etc. But I react how men of my generation do and I'm chastised for it (not the banning, but the ridiculous reactions from many in the thread depicting me as a loon)? Please. "The moderator in question" knew what he was doing. So did I.



    A couple of quick notes:



    --Tons of hilarious posts/Bollywood stuff. Well done,muchachos.



    --No, I am not Jets88NY.



    -- Two year banning is a "place holder"? LOL. Right.



    --In these times of "adversity", you really see a person's/friend's true mettle as well as being completely surprised by the compassion, loyalty and friendship of unexpected others. Thank you all so very much.



    -- To Raoul Duke: I know you are a friend of "the moderator in question", so respect that you are defending him. But your characterization of me is misguided at best. Maybe in France folks threaten to "contact my State's Attorney General". But here in the US, stuff like that is a joke. Go back and read the Bozo's Thread. Even JW came to understand its intent. Again, on my son's life, unlike my terse response to "the moderator in question", that was a designed, yet poorly executed, goof. The only real aspects were my thinly veiled shots at JetsBabe, which I regret to thuis day.



    Okay, so I hope this has not bored you all to tears. It's just frustrating to sit by whilst your character is being assassinated (by some) and incorrect statements are being made. IMO, it's bad form to rip someone when they are unable to defend themselves.



    Thanks for listening, gents. This is a one take, so please forgive syntactical/grammatical/spelling errors.



    BG






    http://youtu.be/_qcs_eoM6vo







    -

  9. #29
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Staten Island
    Posts
    8,930
    Quote Originally Posted by Apache 51 View Post
    After reading the two threads, I want to take a few minutes to correct a few things and, if possible, clear my name.



    First, I never had a problem with SOOTH 86ing the Hotties Forum. I didn't like it, as we have lost tons of creative, and often funny, posts. But, as 32Green (from the PM I sent him after the forum's expunging) will attest, I encouraged SOOTH to abandon the Hotties Forum. Why? Because if JI.com is so dependent upon advertising revenue, that place was an accident (nip and/or lip slip)waiting to happen. I even wrote that I understood the move in several posts in the Hampur.



    My jibes were directly related to the "advertiser" who saw fit to call SOOTH on the carpet for the image(s). They were also targeted at the removal of most of my post count, for which I received no explanation. Was I being punished for a Hotties Forum image(s)? I asked politely several times, but all I received back rom various moderators were goofy responses. I felt like Josef K. in Kafka's The Trial, only with better penmanship.



    Several folks have written that they don't understand how people like me can be so serious about an internet community. To them, I say you missed the ball by a mile. Probably why no one knows who you are.



    Virtually every day, for years, I have logged on here to contribute something. Humor, perspective, a pat on the back to a friend (yes, a friend) who may be going through a health challenge or loss of a loved one or pet, etc. To take all that away without explanation bothered me as well as belittling what I have tried to create. You don't understand it? Fine, I digged being here hanging out with my buddies.



    In the now fateful 32Green Thread, the only reason I mentioned the Hotties Forum incident was to poke fun at 32, tying in the the question of where he had gone (see post #4 in that thread). Then, it was to respond to Mr. Churchill, who asked the question: "By the way, anyone else lol over Advertisor-Gate, when half the ads I get at JI are things like "DateMyOldMilf.lol" and "AsianMailOrderBrides.lol"?" (See post #5)



    Next, I responded to Churchill saying that I had received an advert from a Taiwanese dating service. After seeing another ad with a scantily clad woman, I quoted Churchill's post again to further illustrate the point. No disrespect was meant to SOOTH or his action vis-a-vis the Hotties Thread. Instead, it was a slap at the hypocrisy of the advertiser.



    It is at this point when "the moderator in question" chose to be a bit snippy with me (see post #10), to which I corrected his posting and called him a "dunce".



    Next, "the moderator" decided to make it personal, implying that I frequented Asian porn sites (which I do not; I know, you're all stunned), etc. To which, I responded in my terse tone and strong language. The reason? As I pointed out in that posting (#17 for those following along), "the moderator in question" had seen fit to chastise me two other times before this incident. We tried to hash it out both on the board and in PMs. For some reason only "the moderator in question" can divulge, he decided to make it personal (making the medical/psychological determination that I have emotional issues, etc.) and adversarial.



    (ASIDE: Not sure what folks don't understand, but almost all the images I have ever posted came directly from Google Image. The "art" I bring to it is going through myriad photos to find ones displaying sexiness or some other characteristic of attractiveness. On my son's life, I have never been on one dating site, of any ethnicity.)



    For me, that crossed the line, engendering my angry reaction. I stand by it. Men of my generation and background, taken beyond a certain point, will almost always react similarly. "The moderator in question" actually got off easy. Literally, I've seen folks get punched up for less.



    Think I'm imagining all this? That "the moderator in question" is being unfairly targeted? Is just everyone's bestest (sic) buddy? Go read "the moderator in question's" response to Churchill after my post.



    Notice how "the moderator in question" also tries to belittle Churchill, who will have none of it and swats him down mightily. But not before "the moderator in question" does what all do who have been outmatched intellectually and have no argument: He gives him a shrug and says he doesn't care (see post 42). Right. Just as "the moderator in question" in this thread who said: "Like I said, I get it. Whatever. You're all imaginary Internet beings anyway." What a great guy. Certainly worthy of garnering our respect.



    So, many of you folks think calling a person a scumbag and instructing him to go f**k himself is inductive of a "meltdown". Really? These are words/phrases which have never been used in this forum? Meltdown? Give me a break. Talk about candy ass.



    Again, read my post. I outline clearly that "the moderator in question" has approached me similarly on other occasions and IMO has overstepped his moderating authority by making it personal and antagonizing me. Again, in the same spot, I'd do exactly the same thing. So would most of you.



    And that brings me to how so many of you reacted in the two threads. Calling me emotionally unstable, in need of dosage corrections to my medications, how I had gone completely off the rails, etc. Again, really? Unlike my actions, this is the definition of overreaction.



    Almost daily, I read in various threads how men today act like p*ssies, how we are raising a generation of wimpy kids, etc. But I react how men of my generation do and I'm chastised for it (not the banning, but the ridiculous reactions from many in the thread depicting me as a loon)? Please. "The moderator in question" knew what he was doing. So did I.



    A couple of quick notes:



    --Tons of hilarious posts/Bollywood stuff. Well done,muchachos.



    --No, I am not Jets88NY.



    -- Two year banning is a "place holder"? LOL. Right.



    --In these times of "adversity", you really see a person's/friend's true mettle as well as being completely surprised by the compassion, loyalty and friendship of unexpected others. Thank you all so very much.



    -- To Raoul Duke: I know you are a friend of "the moderator in question", so respect that you are defending him. But your characterization of me is misguided at best. Maybe in France folks threaten to "contact my State's Attorney General". But here in the US, stuff like that is a joke. Go back and read the Bozo's Thread. Even JW came to understand its intent. Again, on my son's life, unlike my terse response to "the moderator in question", that was a designed, yet poorly executed, goof. The only real aspects were my thinly veiled shots at JetsBabe, which I regret to thuis day.



    Okay, so I hope this has not bored you all to tears. It's just frustrating to sit by whilst your character is being assassinated (by some) and incorrect statements are being made. IMO, it's bad form to rip someone when they are unable to defend themselves.



    Thanks for listening, gents. This is a one take, so please forgive syntactical/grammatical/spelling errors.



    BG

  10. #30
    I'm so confused.

    Who is the "moderator in question"?

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Apache 51 View Post
    After reading the two threads, I want to take a few minutes to correct a few things and, if possible, clear my name.



    First, I never had a problem with SOOTH 86ing the Hotties Forum. I didn't like it, as we have lost tons of creative, and often funny, posts. But, as 32Green (from the PM I sent him after the forum's expunging) will attest, I encouraged SOOTH to abandon the Hotties Forum. Why? Because if JI.com is so dependent upon advertising revenue, that place was an accident (nip and/or lip slip)waiting to happen. I even wrote that I understood the move in several posts in the Hampur.



    My jibes were directly related to the "advertiser" who saw fit to call SOOTH on the carpet for the image(s). They were also targeted at the removal of most of my post count, for which I received no explanation. Was I being punished for a Hotties Forum image(s)? I asked politely several times, but all I received back rom various moderators were goofy responses. I felt like Josef K. in Kafka's The Trial, only with better penmanship.



    Several folks have written that they don't understand how people like me can be so serious about an internet community. To them, I say you missed the ball by a mile. Probably why no one knows who you are.



    Virtually every day, for years, I have logged on here to contribute something. Humor, perspective, a pat on the back to a friend (yes, a friend) who may be going through a health challenge or loss of a loved one or pet, etc. To take all that away without explanation bothered me as well as belittling what I have tried to create. You don't understand it? Fine, I digged being here hanging out with my buddies.



    In the now fateful 32Green Thread, the only reason I mentioned the Hotties Forum incident was to poke fun at 32, tying in the the question of where he had gone (see post #4 in that thread). Then, it was to respond to Mr. Churchill, who asked the question: "By the way, anyone else lol over Advertisor-Gate, when half the ads I get at JI are things like "DateMyOldMilf.lol" and "AsianMailOrderBrides.lol"?" (See post #5)



    Next, I responded to Churchill saying that I had received an advert from a Taiwanese dating service. After seeing another ad with a scantily clad woman, I quoted Churchill's post again to further illustrate the point. No disrespect was meant to SOOTH or his action vis-a-vis the Hotties Thread. Instead, it was a slap at the hypocrisy of the advertiser.



    It is at this point when "the moderator in question" chose to be a bit snippy with me (see post #10), to which I corrected his posting and called him a "dunce".



    Next, "the moderator" decided to make it personal, implying that I frequented Asian porn sites (which I do not; I know, you're all stunned), etc. To which, I responded in my terse tone and strong language. The reason? As I pointed out in that posting (#17 for those following along), "the moderator in question" had seen fit to chastise me two other times before this incident. We tried to hash it out both on the board and in PMs. For some reason only "the moderator in question" can divulge, he decided to make it personal (making the medical/psychological determination that I have emotional issues, etc.) and adversarial.



    (ASIDE: Not sure what folks don't understand, but almost all the images I have ever posted came directly from Google Image. The "art" I bring to it is going through myriad photos to find ones displaying sexiness or some other characteristic of attractiveness. On my son's life, I have never been on one dating site, of any ethnicity.)



    For me, that crossed the line, engendering my angry reaction. I stand by it. Men of my generation and background, taken beyond a certain point, will almost always react similarly. "The moderator in question" actually got off easy. Literally, I've seen folks get punched up for less.



    Think I'm imagining all this? That "the moderator in question" is being unfairly targeted? Is just everyone's bestest (sic) buddy? Go read "the moderator in question's" response to Churchill after my post.



    Notice how "the moderator in question" also tries to belittle Churchill, who will have none of it and swats him down mightily. But not before "the moderator in question" does what all do who have been outmatched intellectually and have no argument: He gives him a shrug and says he doesn't care (see post 42). Right. Just as "the moderator in question" in this thread who said: "Like I said, I get it. Whatever. You're all imaginary Internet beings anyway." What a great guy. Certainly worthy of garnering our respect.



    So, many of you folks think calling a person a scumbag and instructing him to go f**k himself is inductive of a "meltdown". Really? These are words/phrases which have never been used in this forum? Meltdown? Give me a break. Talk about candy ass.



    Again, read my post. I outline clearly that "the moderator in question" has approached me similarly on other occasions and IMO has overstepped his moderating authority by making it personal and antagonizing me. Again, in the same spot, I'd do exactly the same thing. So would most of you.



    And that brings me to how so many of you reacted in the two threads. Calling me emotionally unstable, in need of dosage corrections to my medications, how I had gone completely off the rails, etc. Again, really? Unlike my actions, this is the definition of overreaction.



    Almost daily, I read in various threads how men today act like p*ssies, how we are raising a generation of wimpy kids, etc. But I react how men of my generation do and I'm chastised for it (not the banning, but the ridiculous reactions from many in the thread depicting me as a loon)? Please. "The moderator in question" knew what he was doing. So did I.



    A couple of quick notes:



    --Tons of hilarious posts/Bollywood stuff. Well done,muchachos.



    --No, I am not Jets88NY.



    -- Two year banning is a "place holder"? LOL. Right.



    --In these times of "adversity", you really see a person's/friend's true mettle as well as being completely surprised by the compassion, loyalty and friendship of unexpected others. Thank you all so very much.



    -- To Raoul Duke: I know you are a friend of "the moderator in question", so respect that you are defending him. But your characterization of me is misguided at best. Maybe in France folks threaten to "contact my State's Attorney General". But here in the US, stuff like that is a joke. Go back and read the Bozo's Thread. Even JW came to understand its intent. Again, on my son's life, unlike my terse response to "the moderator in question", that was a designed, yet poorly executed, goof. The only real aspects were my thinly veiled shots at JetsBabe, which I regret to thuis day.



    Okay, so I hope this has not bored you all to tears. It's just frustrating to sit by whilst your character is being assassinated (by some) and incorrect statements are being made. IMO, it's bad form to rip someone when they are unable to defend themselves.



    Thanks for listening, gents. This is a one take, so please forgive syntactical/grammatical/spelling errors.



    BG
    Whoa.

  12. #32
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    18,616
    Quote Originally Posted by southside View Post
    Seriously, the JAZZ HEAD thread needs Borgo. Something better be done and soon.
    I just joined a jazz trio. Gonna play electric bass. I'll keep you posted.

  13. #33
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ (Jets Stadium Section 246)
    Posts
    36,600
    Quote Originally Posted by FF2 View Post
    I'm so confused.

    Who is the "moderator in question"?
    He's the one Borgo had an issue with.

    Try to keep up.

  14. #34
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by Gata View Post
    It's been a while how's everyone?

    Is ragu still sharing too much of his love life?

    Did Southside ever lose his V-Card?

    Did the meet-up ever happen?

    Who got banned?



    WHAT DID I MISS?
    The landing strip has been overrun with angry homer jet posters who pile on anyone with an opinion such as starting Sanchez or realizing that we may not have a spectacular season...also one poster who thinks he's clever with his bad nicknames for players like Sanchez or anyone on the Pats...free Borgo, bring back SARI...end the homer gestapo ...

  15. #35
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The depths of Despair.
    Posts
    40,159
    Quote Originally Posted by FF2 View Post
    I'm so confused.
    Quote Originally Posted by 32green View Post





    -

  16. #36
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Van down by the river
    Posts
    22,999
    BG is banned.

    But FlushingShiftJest is still stomping around in his tennis ball-tipped walker.

    Let that sink in....

  17. #37
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The depths of Despair.
    Posts
    40,159
    Quote Originally Posted by PlumberKhan View Post
    BG is banned.

    But FlushingShiftJest is still stomping around in his tennis ball-tipped walker.

    Let that sink in....
    I cant ban him 'cause he hates me. Figure that one out.


    -

  18. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by PlumberKhan View Post
    BG is banned.

    But FlushingShiftJest is still stomping around in his tennis ball-tipped walker.

    Let that sink in....
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP4abiHdQpc

  19. #39
    Read Apach-gos Post. Would Read Again.

  20. #40
    Jets Insider VIP
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    13,565
    This place is a circus

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us