Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Nuclear Waste Bill Fails to Address Near-Term On-Site Management and Risks from Overc

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East of the Jordan, West of the Rock of Gibraltar
    Posts
    4,805

    Nuclear Waste Bill Fails to Address Near-Term On-Site Management and Risks from Overc

    http://m.ucsusa.org/news/commentary/...-fails-to.html


    The political nightmare of what to do with spent nuclear fuel.

    how about we stop creating more of it ASAP?

    Nuclear Waste Bill Fails to Address Near-Term On-Site Management and Risks from Overcrowded Pools

    Statement by Robert Cowin, Union of Concerned Scientists

    WASHINGTON (June 27, 2013)—Today four senators introduced a bill calling for a pilot interim waste storage site for high-level nuclear waste from a dozen closed nuclear power plants, a follow-on interim facility for waste from currently operating plants, and a new oversight agency to manage the process. Over the last 50 years, this waste—the spent fuel rods from nuclear reactors—has been piling up at nuclear power plants across the country.

    Below is a statement by Robert Cowin, a senior legislative representative at the Union of Concerned Scientists:

    “We applaud the four senators for working across the aisle to tackle this long-standing, complex and challenging issue, but public safety must be the paramount priority.

    “It makes sense to consolidate nuclear waste from closed plants, since that can provide greater security at a lower cost. Doing so would reduce the number of potential terrorist targets and, along with it, the likelihood of an attack.

    “Ultimately, however, a permanent geologic repository is the safest way to dispose of this waste, so any efforts to site and build an interim storage facility must be linked to progress on establishing a permanent repository. No interim site should become a de facto permanent repository.

    “Finally, even under the rosiest scenario, it will take years to site and build interim storage facilities. That means large quantities of nuclear waste will necessarily remain at nuclear plants for a long time—and three quarters of it is currently crammed in cooling pools. This bill misses the opportunity to dramatically improve public safety by requiring plant owners to transfer this waste to dry casks, which are inherently safer and more secure. Given that plant owners eventually will have to move this waste to dry casks to ship it to an interim or permanent facility, it makes sense to do it sooner rather than later to better protect the public.”

    The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet's most pressing problems. Joining with citizens across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future.


  2. #2
    All League
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    2,956
    "Well you know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button."

    Homer J. Simpson




  3. #3
    Nuclear Energy is the only real alternative to fossil fuels as an energy source. It can sustain our grid and unlike solar or wind it is not reliant on natural events happening so it is therefore consistent. The waste has to go somewhere and there are safe methods of storing it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us