Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Many in G.O.P. Offer Theory: Default Wouldn’t Be That Bad

  1. #1
    All League
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    East of the Jordan, West of the Rock of Gibraltar

    Many in G.O.P. Offer Theory: Default Wouldn’t Be That Bad

    WASHINGTON — Senator Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina, a reliable friend of business on Capitol Hill and no one’s idea of a bomb thrower, isn’t buying the apocalyptic warnings that a default on United States government debt would lead to a global economic cataclysm.

    “We always have enough money to pay our debt service,” said Mr. Burr, who pointed to a stream of tax revenue flowing into the Treasury as he shrugged off fears of a cascading financial crisis. “You’ve had the federal government out of work for close to two weeks; that’s about $24 billion a month. Every month, you have enough saved in salaries alone that you’re covering three-fifths, four-fifths of the total debt service, about $35 billion a month. That’s manageable for some time.”

    As President Obama steps up his declarations about the dire consequences of not raising the debt limit, increasing numbers of Congressional Republicans are disputing that forecast, as well as the timing of when the Treasury might run out of money and the implications of a default, further complicating the negotiating situation for both Mr. Obama and Speaker John A. Boehner, who must find a way out of the impasse.

    Both men were counting on the prospect of a global economic meltdown to help pull restive Republicans into line. On Wall Street, among business leaders and in a vast majority of university economics departments, the threat of significant instability resulting from a debt default is not in question. But a lot of Republicans simply do not believe it.

    A surprisingly broad section of the Republican Party is convinced that a threat once taken as economic fact may not exist — or at least may not be so serious. Some question the Treasury’s drop-dead deadline of Oct. 17. Some government services might have to be curtailed, they concede. “But I think the real date, candidly, the date that’s highly problematic for our nation, is Nov. 1,” said Senator Bob Corker, Republican of Tennessee.

    Others say there is no deadline at all — that daily tax receipts would be more than enough to pay off Treasury bonds as they come due.

    “It really is irresponsible of the president to try to scare the markets,” said Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky. “If you don’t raise your debt ceiling, all you’re saying is, ‘We’re going to be balancing our budget.’ So if you put it in those terms, all these scary terms of, ‘Oh my goodness, the world’s going to end’ — if we balance the budget, the world’s going to end? Why don’t we spend what comes in?”

    “If you propose it that way,” he said of not raising the debt limit, “the American public will say that sounds like a pretty reasonable idea.”

    In a news conference, Mr. Obama said repeatedly that those who doubted the repercussions of a default were making a huge mistake.

    “When I hear people trying to downplay the consequences of that, I think that’s really irresponsible, and I’m happy to talk to any of them individually and walk them through exactly why it’s irresponsible,” he said. “And it’s particularly funny coming from Republicans who claim to be champions of business. There’s no business person out here who thinks this wouldn’t be a big deal, not one. You go to anywhere from Wall Street to Main Street, and you ask a C.E.O. of a company or ask a small-business person whether it’d be a big deal if the United States government isn’t paying its bills on time. They’ll tell you it’s a big deal. It would hurt.”

    The turmoil created by the partial shutdown of the federal government has already sent investors fleeing from stocks to the safe harbor of Treasury bonds, long considered the safest investment on earth because the full faith and credit of the United States government has never been questioned. If that safe harbor is undermined, most economists have said loudly and repeatedly, the impact could be catastrophic.

    The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, both bastions of Republican support, sent letters to Congress on Tuesday urging action on the debt ceiling.

    “Our nation has never defaulted in the past, and failing to raise the debt limit in a timely fashion will seriously disrupt our fragile economy and have a ripple effect throughout the world,” wrote Jay Timmons, the president of the manufacturers’ group.

    Some Republicans trust such warnings.

    “Unlike some of my colleagues, I’ve been told by too many people in the financial business that there will be reactions in the market,” said Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona. “Of course I’m worried.”

    But the voices of denial are loud and persistent, with some Republicans saying that the fallout from the continuing shutdown and the automatic, across-the-board budget cuts known as sequestration has been less severe than predicted.

    Mr. Paul acknowledged that some economists disagreed with him, but said others agreed. Peter Morici, a conservative economist and a frequent guest on Fox Business, dashed off a column on Tuesday in which he argued that “House Republicans, by refusing to raise the debt ceiling until they obtain budget reforms, may be the country’s last hope to avoid a financial ruin.”

    Congressional Republicans have varied arguments. To Representative Paul Broun, Republican of Georgia and a candidate for the Senate, it is a question of ranking the evils.

    “There are a lot of things that are going to affect our economy,” he said. “The greatest threat right now is Obamacare. It’s already destroyed jobs, it’s already destroyed our economy, and if it stays in place as it is now, it’s going to destroy America.”

    Representative Ted Yoho, a freshman Florida Republican who had no experience in elective office before this year, said the largest economy on earth should learn from his large-animal veterinary practice.

    “Everybody talks about how destabilizing doing this will be on the markets,” he said. “And you’ll see that initially, but heck, I’ve seen that in my business. When you go through that, and you address the problem and you address your creditors and say, ‘Listen, we’re going to pay you. We’re just not going to pay you today, but we’re going to pay you with interest, and we will pay everybody that’s due money’ — if you did that, the world would say America is finally addressing their problem.”

    Representative Justin Amash, Republican of Michigan and a leader of the House’s libertarian wing, said: “There’s no way to default on Oct. 17. We will have enough money to make interest payments. The issue is, how do we restructure our government so we don’t have to keep hitting the debt ceiling?”

    And while Representative Trent Franks, Republican of Arizona, conceded that a government that could no longer borrow money would have to curtail some of its contracting, he said Democrats should not get carried away.

    “It’s like everything else here,” he said. “People on both sides of every argument seem to employ hyperbole when they could just state the truth and it would still be of significant consequence.”

    Ashley Parker contributed reporting.

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    From Parts Unknown
    I agree.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    I'm getting tired of hearing "default" used as a substitute for "not raising the debt limit by oct 17" Not taking out more debt, is not the same as not paying existing debt.

    Yes i realize we played to take out new credit to pay interest on our old credit (and that in and of itself ought to scare everyone who lives in this country), but thankfully that's not our only option. I both sides really wanted to, they could pay down the debt, without taking out any additional debt.

  4. #4
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    We already know that Obuttocks has ruled that the public shall suffer as much as possible so Dumocrats can gain political points.

  5. #5
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    New York
    Obama, Hilary and the kept man all have voted against raising the debt ceiling as Senators.

    If we can pay our debt without raising the ceiling we should. Why let the govt spend more than it has to?

  6. #6
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    One hour. from MetLife
    The Default doesn't mean defaulting on paying interest on Treasuries; however, the perception may cause a panic world wide and have the same effect an actual default. Why screw around, we just came off one of the biggest recessions. The economy is very delicate and we are printing money at an unbelievable pace.

  7. #7
    Manage the Message 101:

    If people think Government cannot run without a never-ending-increase in our debt, people will be angry if we don't raise it.

    Scare them with apocolyptic end of the country language, descibe those who oppose as hostage taking terrorists and traitors, proclaim any objections as "unprecedented", and many many sheeple will buy that message.

    The (D) are running the message management playbook to the letter.

  8. #8
    All Pro
    Join Date
    May 2004
    New Jersey
    Quote Originally Posted by RMJK View Post
    The Default doesn't mean defaulting on paying interest on Treasuries; however, the perception may cause a panic world wide and have the same effect an actual default. Why screw around, we just came off one of the biggest recessions. The economy is very delicate and we are printing money at an unbelievable pace.
    Because then there is never an end in sight. New crises will continue to be manufactured as excuses. Spending like drunken sailors hasn't gotten out of the recession how about trying a different tactic instead of doing the same and expecting different results?


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Follow Us