Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: WTF, just wtf?

  1. #1

    WTF, just wtf?


  2. #2
    I just threw up in my mouth.

    Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk 2

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Warfish View Post
    Ok.....i have a lot of respect for u as a poster.....but here you are dead wrong.

    Those two fags might be faggy but i guarantee you they are nice, loving smart people.

    They will raise that boy in a positive environment vs the crappy dsyfunctional orphanage he was destined for.

    God bless those fags. Shame on u warfish. Evolve already. I know u have it in u and thats a compliment

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by dickkotite View Post
    Ok.....i have a lot of respect for u as a poster.....but here you are dead wrong.

    Those two fags might be faggy but i guarantee you they are nice, loving smart people.

    They will raise that boy in a positive environment vs the crappy dsyfunctional orphanage he was destined for.

    God bless those fags. Shame on u warfish. Evolve already. I know u have it in u and thats a compliment
    wtf are you on about?

    Did you read both articles mate?

  5. #5
    Whoooooooaaaaaaa stop the clock. Missed that

    Ok one of two things are going on here......

    Either warfish is trying to imply that all same sex adoptive parents are porno pimps ( which would greatly disappoint me ) or this is an isolated case.

    Lemme tell u something, fags are way more intelligent, stable and better role models than non fags. I support em

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by dickkotite View Post
    Ok.....i have a lot of respect for u as a poster.....but here you are dead wrong.

    Those two fags might be faggy but i guarantee you they are nice, loving smart people.

    They will raise that boy in a positive environment vs the crappy dsyfunctional orphanage he was destined for.

    God bless those fags. Shame on u warfish. Evolve already. I know u have it in u and thats a compliment
    I'm gonna have to agree with Dick here.... I thought you were better than that, Fist of War!

  7. #7
    Ok...bottom line churchill.... Fag adoptions....pro or con?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitman Harris View Post
    I'm gonna have to agree with Dick here.... I thought you were better than that, Fist of War!
    Youre another guy that will be moving into my compound and and killing when i say you need to kill. Dont woory 40 virgins await you. If u r not a gayboy you will thank me

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by dickkotite View Post
    Ok.....i have a lot of respect for u as a poster.....but here you are dead wrong.

    Those two fags might be faggy but i guarantee you they are nice, loving smart people.

    They will raise that boy in a positive environment vs the crappy dsyfunctional orphanage he was destined for.

    God bless those fags. Shame on u warfish. Evolve already. I know u have it in u and thats a compliment



  10. #10
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Portland Oregon
    Posts
    5,061
    Sad, string them guys up.

  11. #11
    Screw the same sex marriage agenda. If a child was abused in any way shape or form I'm going to express moral indignation as any sensible person should. Whether this reflects upon all same sex couples doesn't matter nor was it implied.

    What was implied is that we are letting our progressive sensibility get the best of us. We say a same sex couple raises a child then they must be great because I am so liberal and tolerant I must anticipate they will raise children better than I could in my heterosexual ignorance. We must judge people based on their character not based on our political predispositions. So I categorically deny that same sex couples are either better or worse than than the normative couple in raising families.

    Ask not whether a couple is composed of a man and a woman but whether it is composed of those who would injure the child.

    That being said I think having a man and a woman is better for a child in certain irrefutable respects. Exposure to models of both genders gives one a better introduction to social interactions with both genders. Additionally, my gut instinct is that homosexuality is sort of promulgated by same sex couples. If you had social scientist collecting data you would likely find that children raised by same sex couples are more likely to engage in same sex intercourse. I'm not saying this is a bad thing. Just that we are dealing with an identifiable allocation of sexual identities that may be altered as a result of the adoption.

  12. #12
    Warfish's response is delayed by the shame he feels right now. Instead of fessing up, he is over fabricating an uber response ala green jets and ham. It will include perfect grammar and conventions of written text. This way, he will look extra smart and respectable like all the smarty pants in the politics forum, where it belonged in the first place

  13. #13
    I just criticized the reasonable man post, but it got deleted......ughhh

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by dickkotite View Post
    I just criticized the reasonable man post, but it got deleted......ughhh
    What's there to criticize. I'm all for same-sex marriage and adoption. I'm also in the Richard Posner school of thought as it comes to how we deal with unwanted children. Just appears to me that we are denying certain factors when it comes to the children of same sex couples, they are in fact more likely to be gay.

  15. #15
    . If you had social scientist collecting data you would likely find that children raised by same sex couples are more likely to engage in same sex intercourse. I'm not saying this is a bad thing. Just that we are dealing with an identifiable allocation of sexual identities that may be altered as a result of the adoption.[/QUOTE]

    No, you are saying its bad. Just be honest. Whether an adult is licking snatch or shaft is their business, however i believer it is instilled by birth vs. upbringing. Adopted children of fags will become heterosexual, unless by chance they are born gay

    Either way, a gay couple adopting them into a loving home to me is a beautiful thing

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by dickkotite View Post
    Warfish's response is delayed by the shame he feels right now.
    Are you drunk Dick?

    If so, you should try one of my "Rusty Scotsman" drinks, detailed elsewhere in this very forum.

    Instead of fessing up, he is over fabricating an uber response ala green jets and ham. It will include perfect grammar and conventions of written text. This way, he will look extra smart and respectable like all the smarty pants in the politics forum, where it belonged in the first place
    I was (am) playing video games.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by dickkotite View Post
    . If you had social scientist collecting data you would likely find that children raised by same sex couples are more likely to engage in same sex intercourse. I'm not saying this is a bad thing. Just that we are dealing with an identifiable allocation of sexual identities that may be altered as a result of the adoption.
    No, you are saying its bad. Just be honest. Whether an adult is licking snatch or shaft is their business, however i believer it is instilled by birth vs. upbringing. Adopted children of fags will become heterosexual, unless by chance they are born gay

    Either way, a gay couple adopting them into a loving home to me is a beautiful thing[/QUOTE]

    I never said it was bad. I don't ascribe to normative reasoning when it comes to what consenting adults do in their bedrooms. I'm just saying its a distributive reality irrelevant of whether we privilege it or not.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Reasonable man View Post
    What's there to criticize. I'm all for same-sex marriage and adoption. I'm also in the Richard Posner school of thought as it comes to how we deal with unwanted children. Just appears to me that we are denying certain factors when it comes to the children of same sex couples, they are in fact more likely to be gay.
    Lol i disagree. They will not be less or more gay. What do i know?, really nothing more than you. I however would prefer to see orphans afforded some chace at anice fun life even with homosexuals vs an orpanage


    In short, i believe fagdom is created at birth,, ,, u feel it is environmental....to each his own heck maybe u r right but i doubt it

  19. #19
    [QUOTE=Warfish;5178089]Are you drunk Dick?

    If so, you should try one of my "Rusty Scotsman" drinks, detailed elsewhere in this very forum.



    I was (am) playing video games.[/QUOTEi am interested in a rusty scotsman

    In the honor of scotland, if u post the recipie i promise to drink 3 tomorrow night

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by dickkotite View Post
    Lol i disagree. They will not be less or more gay. What do i know?, really nothing more than you. I however would prefer to see orphans afforded some chace at anice fun life even with homosexuals vs an orpanage


    In short, i believe fagdom is created at birth,, ,, u feel it is environmental....to each his own heck maybe u r right but i doubt it
    The best solution to adoption is to create a free market for the alienation of children. Judge Posner has detailed this point extensively and I need not go into detail on the subject. I will confine myself to saying that the average expense incurred through the process of adopting a child exceed $10,000. If we were just honest and had rigorous industry standards private markets could deal with orphans far more effectively than the public sector. This is coming from someone who commended the public sector in its handling of certain identifiable interests a few minutes ago in a different thread.

    This is all to say that you should not accuse me of assigning any lesser value to same sex couples as far as adoption rights are concerned. I just think that there are certain identifiable effects of being raised in different households and around different adult models. You as a teacher should be particularly keen to this point. I'm sure you note that children are apt to imitate adult models in their life and while I don't think it is right or wrong for them to imitate same sex couple we should consider the effect of an increased homosexual population on the body politic. Perhaps an increased same sex population will stabilize our economy or lead to a more involved citizenry or a more charity-conscious citizenry --> I AM NOT DENYING THESE POSSIBILITIES. I'm just saying we should consider the likely results of policies in how they influence the next generation. If you think that an increased homosexual population is wrong then by all means try to refute my assertion that children raised by same sex couples are more likely to be gay themselves. But if you see no problem with an increased body of homosexual citizens then you should have no complaint. I myself am fairly neutral on the subject and interested in seeing more data from Pew as they collect information on the political/social/economic involvement of millenial homosexuals.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us