Not that I wanna speak for someone else, but I doubt that is what he is saying at all. Most of the people here who dislike Herm claim we should have taken Fox because he is a much smarter X's and O's guy. But by the end of that game what you saw from CAR was a bad gameplan that Dan Henning had to change on the fly to get any offense at all. Questionable 2pt conversion calls (Though I have said before and will now, the NFL bible on 2 pt conversions says if it is the 4th Q and you are down by 5 pts, you go for the 2 pt conversion to get within a FG). And horrible clock management at the end of the game.Originally posted by Boozer76+Feb 2 2004, 01:14 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Boozer76 @ Feb 2 2004, 01:14 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by -dickkotite@Feb 1 2004, 11:46 PM
<!--QuoteBegin--Rocky Klever@Feb 1 2004, 11:33 PM
You see that Herm haters? Even Super Bowl coaches make the same stupid decisions. Simms was right, going for two changed the complexion of the game. But as usual you will all be quiet tonight. If this was Herm we'd hear it for six months.
so what u r admitting to in a nutshell is that when herm makes a questionable 2 pointer, its ok.
But when fox makes one, its horrible.
stop burying yourself.
Bottom line, CAR always had a good D, even before Fox got there. They were basically a RB and QB away from being a contender and that's what Fox ended up getting handed to him. He did not work some kind of genius plan to get CAR where they are. Jut got them a couple key position players.[/b][/quote]
Hello Boozer?? Fox got handed a Good Team at 1-15 but
Herm got a lousy non playoff Team that was 9-7 the year
before and in 99 Was a Super Bowl favorite!! And you said
your not in the Hermophlie Spin Group??Your invitation will
be coming shortly I'm sure!! :lol: