Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Former U.N. weapons inspector speaks out

  1. #1
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    State Location Here
    Posts
    7,995
    Post Thanks / Like
    I seem to recall someone on the board expressing deep respect for the assertions of former U.N. weapons inspector and sexual predator/pedophile Scott Ritter. Thought it might be a nice gesture to post Mr. Ritter's latest thoughts.



    [quote][b]Kerry, Too, Needs to Clear the Air

    By Scott Ritter
    Scott Ritter, former UN chief inspector in Iraq, 1991-1998, is the
    author of "Frontier Justice: Weapons of Mass Destruction and the
    Bushwhacking of America."

    February 9, 2004

    On April 23, 1971, a 27-year-old Navy veteran named John Kerry sat before the Senate Foreign
    Affairs Committee and chided members on their leadership failures regarding the war in Vietnam.

    "Where is the leadership?" Kerry, a decorated hero who had proved his courage under fire,
    demanded of the senators. "Where are they now that we, the men they sent off to war, have
    returned?" Kerry lambasted those who had pushed so strongly for war in Vietnam. "These men
    have left all the casualties and retreated behind a pious shield of public rectitude."

    Today, on the issue of the war in Iraq, it is John Kerry who is all pious rectitude.

    "I think the administration owes the entire country a full explanation on this war - not just their
    exaggerations but on the failure of American intelligence," Kerry said following the stunning
    announcement by David Kay, the Bush administration's former lead investigator in Iraq, that "we
    were all wrong" about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in that country. The
    problem for Sen. Kerry, of course, is that he, too, is culpable in the massive breach of public trust
    that has come to light regarding Iraq, WMD and the rush to war.

    Almost 30 years after his appearance before the Senate, Sen. Kerry was given the opportunity
    to make good on his promises that he had learned the lessons of Vietnam. During a visit to
    Washington in April 2000, when I lobbied senators and representatives for a full review of
    American policy regarding Iraq, I spoke with John Kerry about what I held to be the hyped-up
    intelligence regarding the threat posed by Iraq's WMD. "Put it in writing," Kerry told me, "and send
    it to me so I can review what you're saying in detail."

    I did just that, penning a comprehensive article for Arms Control Today, the journal of the Arms
    Control Association, on the "Case for the Qualitative Disarmament of Iraq." This article, published
    in June 2000, provided a detailed breakdown of Iraq's WMD capability and made a comprehensive
    case that Iraq did not pose an imminent threat. I asked the Arms Control Association to send
    several copies to Sen. Kerry's office but, just to make sure, I sent him one myself. I never heard
    back from the senator.

    Two years later, in the buildup toward war that took place in the summer of 2002, the Senate
    Foreign Relations Committee, on which Kerry sits, convened a hearing on Iraq. At that hearing a
    parade of witnesses appeared, testifying to the existence of WMD in Iraq. Featured prominently
    was Khidir Hamza, the self-proclaimed "bombmaker to Saddam," who gave stirring first-hand
    testimony to the existence of not only nuclear weapons capability, but also chemical and
    biological weapons as well. Every word of Hamza's testimony has since been proved false.
    Despite receiving thousands of phone calls, letters and e-mails demanding that dissenting expert
    opinion, including my own, be aired at the hearing, Sen. Kerry apparently did nothing, allowing a
    sham hearing to conclude with the finding that there was "no doubt" Saddam Hussein had WMD.

    Sen. Kerry followed up this performance in October 2002 by voting for the war in Iraq. Today he
    justifies that vote by noting that he only approved the "threat of war," and that the blame for Iraq
    rests with President George W. Bush, who failed to assemble adequate international support for
    the war. But this explanation rings hollow in the face of David Kay's findings that there are no
    WMD in Iraq. With the stated casus belli shown to be false, John Kerry needs to better explain his
    role not only in propelling our nation into a war that is rapidly devolving into a quagmire, but
    more importantly, his perpetuation of the falsehoods that got us there to begin with.

    President Bush should rightly be held accountable for what increasingly appears to be
    deliberately misleading statements made by him and members of his administration regarding the
    threat posed by Iraq's WMD. If such deception took place, then Bush no longer deserves the trust
    and confidence of the American people.

    But John Kerry seems to share in this culpability, and if he wants to be the next president of the
    United States, he must first convince the American people that his actions somehow differ from
    those of the man he seeks to replace.

    "Where is the leadership?" John Kerry asked more than 30 years ago, questioning a war that
    consumed life, money and national honor. Today this question still hangs in the air, haunting a
    former Navy combat veteran who needs to convince a skeptical nation that he not only has a
    plan to get America out of Iraq, but also possesses the leadership skills needed to avoid future
    ill-advised adventures.

    Copyright © 2004, Newsday, Inc.[/b][/quote]

  2. #2
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,393
    Post Thanks / Like
    Why would he read something from Ritter when he obviously didn't read all those "false" intel reports from the CIA?

    Where is the leadership, indeed?

  3. #3
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    State Location Here
    Posts
    7,995
    Post Thanks / Like
    Foreign policy flip-flopping aside, what would a liberal, bleeding heart President Kerry do to better protect our children from the likes of these predators?


    [img]http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/picturejokes/8075.jpg[/img]







    [img]http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2004/LAW/02/07/brucia.case/vert.smith.ap.jpg[/img]

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Kingston, NY
    Posts
    3,975
    Post Thanks / Like
    From johnkerry.com:

    "John Kerry is a former prosecutor for one of the country’s largest counties. He personally prosecuted armed robbers, rapists and mob bosses. He learned firsthand the importance of putting resources in the community so that tough laws lead to arrests and convictions. In the United States Senate, he was an early advocate of laws that cracked down on international drug dealers and money laundering and he wrote the Community Oriented Policing System Act which dedicated federal resources to hiring and deploying thousands of cops-on-the-beat throughout the country. Kerry has continued the fight to providing real Homeland Security."

    "John Kerry has been a leading supporter of the Community Oriented Policing program (COPS) and offered the amendment to expand the program to place 100,000 police officers in community policing assignments. He also supported the Police Corps program, which provides scholarships to students who earn their bachelor’s degrees, complete training, and serve for four years on patrol with law enforcement agencies in areas of great need."

  5. #5
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,407
    Post Thanks / Like
    From Bloomberg News:

    As Bloomberg news service reported, Sen. Kerry is a charter member of the moderate Democratic Leadership Conference.

    He backed the Gramm-Rudman budget limitation law in the 1980s, favored capital gains tax cuts in the early 1990s, attacked the "bloated bureaucracy" in public education, favored "means testing" for Social Security and in 1992 even attacked affirmative action as "a crippling perception of racial favoritism."

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us