Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 47

Thread: HDTV - Is It Worth It At This Point

  1. #21
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    6,656
    Post Thanks / Like
    [quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman+May 3 2004, 11:58 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Maxman @ May 3 2004, 11:58 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--chiefst2000[/i]@May 3 2004, 10:18 AM
    [b] Couple things about HD Tivo. 1) when is it coming out. 2) how many hour of HD Recording time will it have? If I used my current tivo in Best recording mode I only get 8 hours. [/b][/quote]
    1. HD TIVO is out now if you have Direct TV. If you have cable (like me) you are S.O.L. for the forseeable future. There are too many cable standards and it makes it tricky. Also TIVO doesn&#39;t feel there is a huge demand for a HD TIVO for cable yet.

    2. The Directv HD Tivo has a 250 gig hard drive. I believe that equates (roughly) to 20 hours of hd recording time. If you record regular TV at the lowest quality it is over 200 hours.

    Hope that helps. [/b][/quote]
    Thanks Max, looks like the IO Cable people are stuck with non hdtv tivo&#39;s for the near future. Cablevision has been saying that they will be coming out with a TIVO like service through their recievers. Does this spell the end for Tivo?????

  2. #22
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    8,682
    Post Thanks / Like
    There&#39;s no doubt that TiVo is really starting to feel pressure from Replay TV and the rest of their competition. They need to get off their ass and start getting these HD TiVo boxes out and in stores, at hopefully less than &#036;700.

    I have a sick feeling these things are gonna cost an arm a and a leg.

  3. #23
    Maxman
    Guest
    [quote][i]Originally posted by The Gun Of Bavaria[/i]@May 3 2004, 12:04 PM
    [b] Maxman, where did you hear that the HD Tivo is out already? From what I&#39;ve heard it hadn&#39;t been released yet. [/b][/quote]
    I think it was just released this week. On TivoCommunity.com there has been lots of talk about it. Like I said I have cable so I am not well versed in Direct TV. But if you do an EBAY search for hr10-250 you will find a few.

    [b]Caution...they are not cheap right now because they just came out&#33;[/b] They will always be pretty expensive because of the larger hard drive required.

    Here is one that is currently being auctioned for &#036;1,425...ouch:

    [url=http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11725&item=3094506146&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW]http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...ssPageName=WDVW[/url]

  4. #24
    All League
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    220a, Row 12
    Posts
    4,197
    Post Thanks / Like
    So, I am all ready for HDTivo/HDTV.

    I do have a question though. The building I live in is sharing one DirecTV dish for the entire building. I know that in order to get DirecTV with HD you need to upgrade the dish to a bigger/better one.

    Q) Will old set top boxes work with the new dish if we get it installed or would everyone in the building have to upgrade to new boxes at the same time?

    BZ

  5. #25
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    8,682
    Post Thanks / Like
    [quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman+May 3 2004, 01:41 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Maxman @ May 3 2004, 01:41 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--The Gun Of Bavaria[/i]@May 3 2004, 12:04 PM
    [b] Maxman, where did you hear that the HD Tivo is out already? From what I&#39;ve heard it hadn&#39;t been released yet. [/b][/quote]
    I think it was just released this week. On TivoCommunity.com there has been lots of talk about it. Like I said I have cable so I am not well versed in Direct TV. But if you do an EBAY search for hr10-250 you will find a few.

    [b]Caution...they are not cheap right now because they just came out&#33;[/b] They will always be pretty expensive because of the larger hard drive required.

    Here is one that is currently being auctioned for &#036;1,425...ouch:

    [url=http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=11725&item=3094506146&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW]http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...ssPageName=WDVW[/url] [/b][/quote]
    Thanks for the link max.


    HOLY SMOKES&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; &#036;1400&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

    I&#39;d be better off getting a HD receiver for sports/live TV and using my current TiVo for non-HD recording.


    I REFUSE to pay that much money.

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    52,055
    Post Thanks / Like
    [quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman[/i]@May 3 2004, 12:41 PM
    [b]
    I think it was just released this week. On TivoCommunity.com there has been lots of talk about it. Like I said I have cable so I am not well versed in Direct TV.

    [b]Caution...they are not cheap right now because they just came out&#33;[/b] They will always be pretty expensive because of the larger hard drive required.

    Here is one that is currently being auctioned for &#036;1,425...ouch:

    [/b][/quote]
    Wow, &#036;1,425. That&#39;s absurd. I could have sworn I read an article a couple months back that said the HD Tivo&#39;s would sell between &#036;500-&#036;700.

    Couldn&#39;t find that article but I did come across this one and it doesn&#39;t sound to good for cable subscribers.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    January 23, 2004
    Doubts about HD TiVo
    Being able to record shows on a digital video recorder (DVR) like our TiVo is just bliss. I don&#39;t think I need to tell you we&#39;re big fans. However, there are some limitations to the current TiVo product, including no tuning of digital cable signals and no recording of HDTV content.

    The announcement of DirecTV&#39;s HD tuner/DVR with TiVo at CES was a big break-through. Finally, folks will be able to record HD signals onto a TiVo-type device. However, this only helps DirecTV (satellite) users, not those of us who are cable subscribers.

    Scientific Atlanta rolled out its 8000HD, an HD-capable cable DVR, to Time Warner cable users in Green Bay, Wisconsin in December. That basic box is what I want to see TiVo produce, but it isn&#39;t likely to happen any time soon for a couple of reasons.

    First, tuning ATSC (over-the-air digital programming) and over-the-air HD would fairly easy for a TiVo unit to do, but the number of people who rely on OTA signals for their HD content is pretty small. And as cable and satellite providers add more HD content, those folks will continue to diminish as a percentage of all HD consumers. Instead, TiVo would have to produce a box that can either tune/record satellite broadcasted content or tune/record QAM (cable) content. Neither of those is trivial because of proprietariness and/or controls enforced by the carriers (TWC, Comcast, DiSH, etc.). Plus, with new initiatives like OpenCable on the way, introducing an expensive new product based on today&#39;s cable standards might be a strategic mistake.

    Partnering, such as what TiVo has done with DirecTV, will be necessary. But, it does not appear that TiVo has had much success so far partnering with any cable TV companies (e.g., Time Warner Cable and Comcast). Why these cable companies insist on using these schlocky DVRs is beyond me, but I suspect it gets down to minimizing their costs. Scientific Atlanta makes tons of low-priced set-top boxes and makes their software barely work. TiVo, in comparison, puts loads of work into enhancing the user interface and the whole user experience...and it shows. But this also makes their products more expensive. This might be a good example of "you get what you pay for."

    So the upshot is that I doubt that we&#39;ll see a cable-compatible or "general-purpose" HD TiVo outside of DirecTV&#39;s unit any time in the next few years. In the meantime, I hope that Scientific Atlanta will license TiVo&#39;s interface so we can have the best of both worlds.

  7. #27
    Maxman
    Guest
    [quote][i]Originally posted by chiefst2000+May 3 2004, 12:15 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (chiefst2000 @ May 3 2004, 12:15 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> [quote]Originally posted by -Maxman@May 3 2004, 11:58 AM
    [b] <!--QuoteBegin--chiefst2000[/i]@May 3 2004, 10:18 AM
    [b] Couple things about HD Tivo. 1) when is it coming out. 2) how many hour of HD Recording time will it have? If I used my current tivo in Best recording mode I only get 8 hours. [/b][/quote]
    1. HD TIVO is out now if you have Direct TV. If you have cable (like me) you are S.O.L. for the forseeable future. There are too many cable standards and it makes it tricky. Also TIVO doesn&#39;t feel there is a huge demand for a HD TIVO for cable yet.

    2. The Directv HD Tivo has a 250 gig hard drive. I believe that equates (roughly) to 20 hours of hd recording time. If you record regular TV at the lowest quality it is over 200 hours.

    Hope that helps. [/b][/quote]
    Thanks Max, looks like the IO Cable people are stuck with non hdtv tivo&#39;s for the near future. Cablevision has been saying that they will be coming out with a TIVO like service through their recievers. Does this spell the end for Tivo????? [/b][/quote]
    This seems to be the case. I don&#39;t think it spells the end for TIVO. From what I have read TIVO doesn&#39;t seem real concerned about the HD Tivo for cable users. They even have in their FAQ that it is not available. So they are certainly not trying to hide it.

    It seems like until there is one cable standard nobody is going to bother.

    Comcast has a TIVO like service (PVR). But it doesn&#39;t have the TIVO software so no season pass, etc. Simply datetime recording. I used to do that with my VCR. I think they also released (or are about to ) a HD version of this. But the drives are so small that you can&#39;t save that much.

    I like TIVO...because it is hackable. LOL.

  8. #28
    All League
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    220a, Row 12
    Posts
    4,197
    Post Thanks / Like
    [url=http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1572712,00.asp?kc=ETRSS02129TX1K0000532]http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558...2129TX1K0000532[/url]

    Seems like they are shipping.... I guess I will pick one up on August or Sept.

    Monday night football&#33; :)

    BZ

  9. #29
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    8,682
    Post Thanks / Like
    HOLY SMOKES

    &#036;1000. - Insane

    [img]http://tiger.orbitsat.com/images/Products/HD-DVR250_large.jpg[/img]
    [url=http://tiger.orbitsat.com/product.asp?PID=HD-DVR250]http://tiger.orbitsat.com/product.asp?PID=HD-DVR250[/url]

  10. #30
    Maxman
    Guest
    TEX:
    Thanks for the article. OpenCable is the standard that I alluded to in an earlier post. But until that is all worked out I don&#39;t see anything being released.

    Guys remember this thing just came out so that is why the ebay prices are so high. There are thousands of people waiting for units they paid for through a pre-order process. The prices will come down but I am not sure what the retail price is. It will probably be around &#036;1,000 if I had to guess but I don&#39;t know for sure.

  11. #31
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Franklin, TN
    Posts
    1,373
    Post Thanks / Like
    Just got back from Best Buy. Sales guy there said that the &#036;399 deal from Directv is a good one. He said ask for the Hughes or Samsung receivers from Directv.

  12. #32
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    8,682
    Post Thanks / Like
    [quote][i]Originally posted by Tennessee_Jet[/i]@May 3 2004, 03:47 PM
    [b] Just got back from Best Buy. Sales guy there said that the &#036;399 deal from Directv is a good one. He said ask for the Hughes or Samsung receivers from Directv. [/b][/quote]
    Hmm.... Can I talk my wife into it, that&#39;s the question?

  13. #33
    Maxman
    Guest
    [quote][i]Originally posted by The Gun Of Bavaria+May 3 2004, 03:40 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (The Gun Of Bavaria @ May 3 2004, 03:40 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Tennessee_Jet[/i]@May 3 2004, 03:47 PM
    [b] Just got back from Best Buy. Sales guy there said that the &#036;399 deal from Directv is a good one. He said ask for the Hughes or Samsung receivers from Directv. [/b][/quote]
    Hmm.... Can I talk my wife into it, that&#39;s the question? [/b][/quote]
    Ask the question during labor. She won&#39;t know any different and will just agree.

  14. #34
    All League
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    958
    Post Thanks / Like
    I got a huge screen Sony with HD and it is absolutely INCREDIBLE&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

  15. #35
    All League
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    2,516
    Post Thanks / Like
    [quote][i]Originally posted by Maxman+May 3 2004, 09:34 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (Maxman @ May 3 2004, 09:34 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--JetChefJR[/i]@May 3 2004, 09:14 AM
    [b] I have a HD 57inch Sony that I purchased last year... in coordination with the purchase, I upgraded my cable service to IO digital cable. With this i get hundreds of channels, and HD channels for a pile of channels... best part about IO is the fact that it doesnt crap out in every freakin rainstorm like satellite... Id def give it a consideration to get one....

    HD isnt just for tv channels... hook that bad boy up to a progressive scan dvd player and try to keep your jaw from dropping. [/b][/quote]
    Not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that you have watched HD DVDs? Because they are coming but they are mainstream yet. [/b][/quote]
    Do you have a progressive scan dvd player??? hook that up to the HDTV using component cables from MONSTER (red, blue, green) and unlock your DVD and TVs potential... I believe its 1080 dpi which is HD isnt it??? sure looks it to me.

  16. #36
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Johnsburg
    Posts
    1,337
    Post Thanks / Like
    guns-
    save your hard earned money.
    don&#39;t fall for that "HD" bull s**t.
    today is the day of "EDTV".
    there will be a day for "HD", but as of now there isn&#39;t enough programming to warrant the cost of it.
    here&#39;s an article that might interest you:

    The Difference Between HDTV, EDTV, and SDTV
    Evan Powell, ProjectorCentral, October 2, 2003
    [url=http://www.projectorcentral.com]http://www.projectorcentral.com[/url]

    The consumer electronics industry has done a spectacular job spreading mass confusion about video. Time was when there was just TV. Now we&#39;ve got SDTV, EDTV, HDTV, 480i, 480p, 525p, 720p, 1080i, progressive scan, component video, composite video, blah blah blah. Enough to make you feel like you need an engineering degree to buy a projector or TV.

    And if you think you are confused now, just go talk to any sales rep on the floor of your local Buster&#39;s Big Screen Megastore and you will get some insight into what true confusion is all about. Many of those reps have little training and can&#39;t tell you anything meaningful about good video. Invariably however they are pushing the deal of the week and selling equipment that may be exactly wrong for your needs.

    Let&#39;s talk basics. You want the best picture you can get for your money, right? OK. Getting there is actually easier than you think. Reading the rest of this article will give you most of what you need to sort out the good stuff from the junk.

    Our Television/Video System. There are over 250 million televisions in the United States. Almost all of them work exactly the same way. A video signal pumps information into a TV at the rate of 30 frames per second. Each frame is a still picture. But they are displayed so rapidly that they give the appearance of continuous motion, just like an animated cartoon.

    Each frame of video contains about 480 active lines of information (482.5 actually, but we will talk round numbers here to communicate the concept). Now a single frame of video is actually painted on the screen line-by-line in two passes. On the first pass, the beam paints all of the odd numbered lines from 1 to 479, top to bottom. That takes 1/60 second. On the second pass it paints all of the even numbered lines from 2 to 480. That also takes 1/60 second. So it takes a total of 1/30 second to display all 480 lines of the frame. This display technique is known as "interlacing."

    When they broadcast video information, they need to give CRT-type TVs time to reset the electronic beam to the top of the screen so it can get ready to paint the next sequence of lines. So they build in an interframe gap that equals about 45 lines. There is no picture information in this 45 line gap—it is there just to allow the TV time to get ready to receive the next frame. So the total number of lines in each frame is 480 + 45 = 525. You&#39;ve probably heard that a TV set has 525 lines. Not so. The signal has 525 lines, but only 480 of them contain active video information that ends up on your screen.

    Sometimes you will see this standard analog TV format designated as 525i, which means 525-interlaced. In common usage, a lot of people also use the term "480i" to refer to analog interlaced 480-line active video. However, the industry has recently defined a digital interlaced 480-line format under the array of DTV formats which is known as Standard Definition Television, or SDTV, and 480i is the correct designation for this format.

    The Problem with Interlacing: Screen Size

    For most of the 50 years that the plain ole "525i" television has been in existence, it has worked just fine. That&#39;s because TVs were small. On a 19" TV set the picture looks terrific because the scan lines and the errors introduced by interlacing are too small to see. But as TVs have gotten larger, the scan lines have become more visible.

    Not only that, but the interlacing system creates weird "artifacts" when blown up to big-screen proportions. When there is motion in the picture, an object will have moved between the time the first half and the second half of the frame are painted. That makes straight lines break up and look like they&#39;ve got jagged edges. And on a 60" TV or a genuine really big-screen image from a front projector, the visible scan lines and jaggies are enough to drive you nuts.

    If you want a good demo of really bad video, just go into any Buster&#39;s Big Screen in your area and look at some of the 60" TVs they have set up. Many of them look terrible—enough to make you want to give up TV altogether. Of course, if you stand back about 30 feet, they look great. But at the distance from which you intend to watch them, you see scan lines, jaggies, and overall picture disintegration that&#39;ll make you go blind in a hurry.

    The fact is that the 525-line interlaced system we have today was never meant to be blown up to large screen proportions. What works beautifully at 19" is a disaster at 60". And TV designers and marketers know that they couldn&#39;t sell really bad video forever just on the WOW factor of the screen size. So they&#39;ve come up with ways to clean up the picture.

    The New Solutions

    The single largest step that can be taken toward better big-screen video is to eliminate the interlacing. Interlacing was originally invented to save transmission bandwidth, since with an interlaced signal you only need to send half the frame at a time. But now we have media such as DVD from which we can read and transmit picture information much faster than ever before. So there is no need to stay with an interlaced format.

    If we can paint all of the scan lines sequentially from 1, 2, 3…up to 480 on one pass, we can eliminate the jaggies that come from interlacing. This is called "progressive scanning." Note that we don&#39;t have any more lines of information—it&#39;s still the same 480 lines. But we paint them in sequence from top to bottom. This 480-line progressive scan technique is commonly referred to as 480p. However, there is still the interframe gap, and there are still 525 total lines. So some people call it 525p instead of 480p. But it&#39;s the same thing.

    Of course the marketers needed to come up with a snazzy name for this marvelous new concept. So they did—Enhanced Definition Television, or EDTV.

    EDTV is a major advance

    EDTV, or 480p, doesn&#39;t sound like much compared to HDTV. But it is in fact a major step forward in picture quality. On a big screen it looks closer in quality to HDTV than it does regular television. And it is here today in its full glory. Most DVD players on the market output both interlaced and progressive signals, and they are getting better and cheaper by the month. So every DVD on the market can be played in EDTV right now&#33;

    Now in order to take advantage of 480p, you need two things: (1) a video source such as a DVD player that outputs that signal, and (2) a television or projector that can take that signal as an input. Warning: Most televisions being sold cannot take 480p. Most home theater projectors, even the least expensive ones under &#036;2,000, can.

    So here is your first absolute rule for buying a new video display, whether it is a projector or a TV: if you want maximum video quality, make sure to buy a TV or projector that is 480p compatible.

    But, you ask, what about regular interlaced video sources like cable television, VCR, laserdisc, and so on—how do I play those signals on a progressive scan video system?

    Well, no problem. You simply to feed your new projector or TV the interlaced signal. All progressive scan display systems can take interlaced signals as well. That is because they have a device on board called a deinterlacer or line doubler.

    Here is what a line doubler (deinterlacer) does: It takes a 480-line interlaced signal from your cable TV or VCR or laserdisc player or DVD player and recombines the odd and even lines into a sequential 480-line progressive signal. Furthermore, when good line doublers recombine the lines, they look for motion offsets (the jaggies), and make adjustments to smooth them out. So their job is to convert a 525i signal into a much cleaner 480p signal. Some of them do this better than others, but most of them produce a much better signal than they started with.

    Furthermore, since the projector/TV scans from top to bottom in 1/60 second, all 480 lines are displayed in that time. So what does the line doubler do with the second 1/60 second, since new frames are arriving at the speed of only 30 frames per second? Simple. It feeds the same 480-line frame to the display a second time.

    So, contrary to what you might assume, a line doubler does NOT double the number of lines. Rather it doubles the number of times the 480 lines are painted on the screen during the 1/30 second frame display time. This increases brightness and stability of the image. But most importantly, the elimination or reduction of the jaggies gives you a much cleaner picture.

    It used to be that the internal line doublers in projectors and TVs were not very good. They could recombine the lines easily enough, but they weren&#39;t capable of smoothing out the motion artifacts. So many folks invested in separate external line doublers that were much more sophisticated. These days internal line doublers are MUCH more comprehensive than they used to be. So the need for an external doubler has diminished. Today, whether you could benefit from investing in an external line doubler or not depends on the quality of the doubler already built into the projector.

    So let&#39;s forget about HDTV for a moment. The big leap forward that is accessible to everyone right now is EDTV, which is simply progressive scanning. I had friends over recently and I put on the Eagles "Hell Freezes Over" DVD, displaying it on a 120" diagonal screen. They were stunned at the picture quality—"I&#39;ve never seen ANY big screen ever look that good," said one. "So that&#39;s HDTV huh?" Nope. That&#39;s just regular DVD my friends, played on a progressive scan DVD player.

    Well then, what about HDTV?

    The broadcast industry is struggling toward conversion of our system to High Definition Television (HDTV), a conversion which presumably will be complete in another five years. HDTV does two things. First, it increases the number of scan lines on the screen. Second, it widens the aspect ratio of the screen from the standard 4:3 which is what most televisions are today, to 16:9. The wider screen format has a more theatrical look.

    The most popular HDTV format is 1080i, or 1080 lines interlaced. As with 525i, the system paints the odd lines first, then the even lines in a second pass. But since there are so many more scan lines, both the lines themselves and the motion jaggies are much less visible.

    Nevertheless, the world of videophiles who seek video perfection are looking forward to the day when even this 1080i signal will be presented progressively—1080p. Faroudja is marketing a video processor that will convert 1080i to 1080p, and there are a few very expensive projectors that will handle the scan rates required for this signal. But for those who don&#39;t want to spend &#036;30,000 on a big-screen TV just yet, 1080i is the most prevalent format today.

    An alternative HDTV format is 720-lines progressive scan, or 720p. Though it has fewer lines, the native progressive scan format eliminates motion artifacts that originate in interlacing, and are still visible in large screen 1080i. So for subject matter that contains a lot of rapid motion--Monday Night Football for example--you can get a clearer, more stable picture from 720p than you can from 1080i. Alternatively, for subject matter that has very little motion, 1080i is capable of rendering more picture detail. Notice that most of the HDTV demo clips being broadcast on HDNet are very slow pans of detailed scenes. They are beautiful images, but those slow pans are intended to disguise the deinterlacing flaws inherent in the 1080i format.

    The bottom line is that 1080i and 720p are both very good HDTV formats. One is not better than the other; they are just each better with particular types of subject matter. When done right, both are clearly superior to the NTSC 480-line format we have today.

    The funny thing is this. For the videophile who wants to spend a great deal of money to get the best possible picture, HDTV is the solution in theory. But the quality of HDTV signals will be dependent upon a host of variables. And economics will be the primary determinant. One can expect broadcasters to minimize production costs and save bandwidth whenever possible. There is one thing that is certain, and that is that broadcasters have absolutely no interest in boosting the cost of production in order to satisfy the desires of a small contingent of videophiles. They want to spend just enough money make picture quality acceptable to the mass market and no more.

    That being the case, don&#39;t imagine that HDTV is going to be uniformly as glorious as the pristine demos you might see in well-calibrated retail showrooms. Just as there are variations in picture quality today between channels, and between programs on given channels, so will the quality of production HDTV vary as well.

    Meanwhile, the quality of the 480-line system continues to improve. Video decoders, deinterlacers, and scalers have all gotten much better at a rapid pace. The video transfer quality on DVDs has improved even since DVDs were introduced. So even without HDTV, large screen projectors today look amazingly good compared to similar products released just 18 months ago. On occasion we see DVD material that is superior to some of the broadcast HDTV we are getting. So the fact is that for the mass consumer market there is not a great deal of difference between HDTV and today&#39;s new 480p when it is done right. The quality difference is certainly nothing that the majority of the population would want to pay much extra for.

    So the bottom line is this--don&#39;t worry about HDTV for now. It will continue to evolve over the next few years and it will be whatever it will be. Who cares? The unfortunate thing is that people are sitting on the sidelines waiting for HDTV to get serious, and they are missing out on EDTV, which is the biggest advance in video quality since color TV.

    The real reason to step up to the latest video systems is not HDTV, but EDTV, or more simply 480p. If you are buying for home theater, get a projector or big-screen that handles 480p as well as 1080i and 720p. If a projector or TV takes 480p it will probably take 1080i and 720p as well. But that won&#39;t be its major benefit since there is not a huge amount of HDTV source material at hand. But today every DVD on the market can be played in EDTV.

    Once you&#39;ve got the fundamentals of 480p installed, then just sit back and enjoy your new vastly improved video system. Once you experience the quality of today&#39;s EDTV, you may find yourself thinking that you don&#39;t care quite as much about HDTV as you once did.


    (Note: click "Send this Page" below to
    forward this article to a friend.)

  17. #37
    All Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Lansing
    Posts
    1,337
    Post Thanks / Like
    Gun,

    last month, everyone in Lansing got a card in the mail regarding local channels. Here, they&#39;ll require the oval dish.

    ...long story short, I agreed to the local channels for a year at 3 bucks/mo, they gave me the oval dish FREE. and Free installation too.

    If you can do that over there in Mayberry, you can get the receiver on ebay for about 300 bucks.

  18. #38
    Maxman
    Guest
    [quote][i]Originally posted by JetChefJR+May 3 2004, 05:01 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>[b]QUOTE[/b] (JetChefJR @ May 3 2004, 05:01 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> [quote]Originally posted by -Maxman@May 3 2004, 09:34 AM
    [b] <!--QuoteBegin--JetChefJR[/i]@May 3 2004, 09:14 AM
    [b] I have a HD 57inch Sony that I purchased last year... in coordination with the purchase, I upgraded my cable service to IO digital cable. With this i get hundreds of channels, and HD channels for a pile of channels... best part about IO is the fact that it doesnt crap out in every freakin rainstorm like satellite... Id def give it a consideration to get one....

    HD isnt just for tv channels... hook that bad boy up to a progressive scan dvd player and try to keep your jaw from dropping. [/b][/quote]
    Not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that you have watched HD DVDs? Because they are coming but they are mainstream yet. [/b][/quote]
    Do you have a progressive scan dvd player??? hook that up to the HDTV using component cables from MONSTER (red, blue, green) and unlock your DVD and TVs potential... I believe its 1080 dpi which is HD isnt it??? sure looks it to me. [/b][/quote]
    Agreed, DVDs look awesome. But there is something called High Def DVDs. It will be big probably starting next year. It will require yet another new DVD player though (I kid you not).

    The quality of these HD DVDs will be even better then what you see today.

  19. #39
    Maxman
    Guest
    Chops...ED is nice and all but is no substitute for HD. If you are only watching DVD movies then ED might be for you. But come Sundays during football season HD is what you want.

  20. #40
    Waterboy
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    5,713
    Post Thanks / Like
    I have a 46" widescreen HDTV and have High def through Comcast. Not very expensive and the picture is incredible. It&#39;s so awesome when the Jets were on in HD last year. You can look at the regular non HD channel and then flip to the HD channel airing the same thing. The difference is stunning.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us