View Poll Results: DO YOU WANT TO SEE IT BECOME A REALITY?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1)YES

    10 66.67%
  • 2)NO

    5 33.33%
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: POLL: What do you guys think of

  1. #1
    Hall Of Fame
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    10,497
    Im just curious about what the opinions are in this forum.

  2. #2
    Hall Of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    4,530
    There's no doubt that the financial ripoff the Jets as an organization get every home game can't go on. Woody Johnson invested serious cash in the team;within reason he deserves a solid return on his investment. Unless they somehow partner with the Jints for a fair dal in New Jersey(which apparenly won't happen), they have to get a new stadium in New York. The question then becomes what are the real costs? On one hand, you have the "DON'T DEVELOP ANYTHING" crowd idiots who oppose everything, and on the other, the rosy predictions from Woody Johnson and Bloomberg.

    The problem I have is that the West Side site is right next to the Lincoln Tunnel, and the whole $500 million platform thing and subway extension make it ridiculously expensive. And that cost will be borne by taxpayers. The whole financing scheme isn't getting past anyone with a calculator. Building in Midtown is the most expensvie place to do so; cost overruns and delays are almost a given. And if the people pushing this are so willing to push that nonsense and not discuss the true costs to taxpayers, I find it hard to believe much else they have to say about their plan. This is the last part of Manhattan below 96th Street that isn't developed, but it's hardly a wasteland. Why should tax dollars be so spent if businesses and real estate interests could develop it just as economically viable without all this taxpayer money? There are studio apartments a few blocks to the south on West Street going for listed prices of $1.5 million. That's not blight.


    Also, this convention stuff is crap; unless you can move NYC next to a beach, Disneyworld or open casinos, it isn't competing with San Diego, Orlando or Vegas. NYC is too expensive for most shows and isn't car friendly. Nobody is staying here for a week for their convention, if it comes here to begin with.

    It seems that Johnson is fighting tooth&nail for a stadium that may never get built. The plans look beautiful, but there have been numerous plans that were sure things that never get built due to political oppostion. Meanwhile, he could do it in Queens and get cracking right now and still make a mint. And do so a great deal cheaper.

  3. #3
    Jets Insider VIP
    JetsInsider.com Legend
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    31,408
    At the game on Sunday I was [b]shocked[/b] by the majority of "boos" when they had the little cartoon on the screen about building the new stadium.

    I want it back in NY...I prefer it be in Queens...but as my handle plainly states [b]Come back to NY!![/b]

  4. #4
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    11,586
    [quote][i]Originally posted by Bugg[/i]@Sep 16 2004, 05:54 PM
    [b] if the people pushing this are so willing to push that nonsense and not discuss the true costs to taxpayers, I find it hard to believe much else they have to say about their plan. [/b][/quote]
    amen to that. it's what started me digging for info and turned my (mildly, w/o info) pro-stadium stance into a pretty strong anti-west side stadium opinion.

  5. #5
    Good job Bugg - thats about as clear and consise and unbiased description of the concerns a few of us have here as NYC residents.

    Nobody is "anti-stadium" per se. I think everyone is in agreement that it would be in the Jets best interests to have their own stadium in New York State.

    Like you, I dont buy the convention argument. A bunch of yokels from the midwest would much rather go to a convention near casinos, Disney, or a beach than to come to big bad scary NYC, where they're lost at night. Sure, it may improve NYC's standing as a convention destination, but its not going to shoot us to the top of the list.

    My biggest concern is the fuzzy math regarding the $$$. I have a general distrust since they havent come out with a whole lot of concrete info yet. As a taxpayer and a Jet fan, Im torn, but Im keeping an open mind. I guess I can always move to New Jersey by 2009 and not give a crap about NYC finances too :lol:

  6. #6
    If the choice was costing tax payers a little money, or Woody moving the team to Anahiem(sp) then what would you say?

    Because that could happen.

  7. #7
    Board Moderator
    Jets Insider VIP
    Charter JI Member

    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    11,586
    [quote][i]Originally posted by ShadeTree#55[/i]@Sep 17 2004, 10:14 AM
    [b] If the choice was costing tax payers a little money, or Woody moving the team to Anahiem(sp) then what would you say?

    Because that could happen. [/b][/quote]
    that could never happen.

    via TV revenue sharing, which pays 100% of player salaries, the jets pay a large proportion (along w/ the giants) of every team's salaries. you don't screw with that.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Follow Us